“are chickens called cocks” moves like a pulse beneath the surface of stillness—a quiet journey into the spaces where feeling begins. It does not seek to tell a story in words, but to let emotion bloom in gestures, pauses, and the fragile distance between two breaths. Within “are chickens called cocks”, time seems to slow, allowing each gaze, each shadow, to reveal something unspoken yet deeply familiar. What emerges is not spectacle, but intimacy shaped by attention and tenderness.
At its heart, “are chickens called cocks” is a meditation on presence—on how we touch, see, and are seen. It asks what happens when the body becomes language, when emotion becomes movement, when silence begins to speak. Desire here is not an act of possession but of recognition: to witness another without the need to define, to hold space for what cannot be fully understood. Through its restraint, “are chickens called cocks” finds beauty in the unfinished, the uncertain, the fleeting.
“are chickens called cocks” invites the viewer to step into a state of quiet awareness. Its rhythm is soft, its images deliberate, yet every moment carries the weight of sincerity. Between light and shadow, warmth and distance, the film unfolds like a memory we have all lived but forgotten—something tender, fragile, and real. It speaks not to the mind but to the body’s own memory of closeness and loss.
In the end, “are chickens called cocks” becomes less a film than a sensation—a gentle echo that lingers after the screen fades. It reminds us that intimacy is not only something we share with others, but something we rediscover within ourselves. Through its quiet honesty, “are chickens called cocks” whispers a truth we rarely hear: that to feel deeply is, in itself, a form of courage.