Author: admin | at 18.03.2016 |
Categories: Cloud Storage Free

Published November 6, 2014 at dimensions 1698 × 1131 in Mainstream Boutique Point of Sale. Anchored masonry veneer wall systems are commonly used throughout North America in residential, commercial and institutional construction. As shown in Figure 1, these exterior wall systems include an outer wythe (layer) of masonry veneer attached across an airspace to a backing wall by anchors. As shown in Figure 1, the vertical support of the veneer is typically provided by a steel (shelf) angle that is attached to the building structural system. The design of the shelf angle support is typically handled as part of the structural engineering design using a variety of design assumptions. Although not usual, more sophisticated finite element models of the veneer wall system can be constructed and, if the deformation of the ties and systems and supports are properly modeled, can be used to accurately analyze the behavior of the wall system. Although finite element analyses can provide accurate prediction of behavior of these systems, this level of analysis effort is not typically warranted in most designs. The finite element analyses indicate that the veneer and shelf angle supports interact, and the veneer is much stiffer than the angle, especially away from the anchor locations. If it is conservatively assumed that the brick veneer spans between anchor supports as a simply-supported, uniformly-loaded beam, then an appropriate anchor spacing and loading can be determined.

To design the veneer as a beam, the allowable stress design procedures described in the masonry standards can be used. If it is assumed that the brick supports itself over the anchor spacing in simple elastic bending, then the critical maximum flexural stress (ft) produced by the moment (Mmax) must be limited to an allowable flexural tensile value (Ft).

The Masonry Standards Joint Committee [MSJC, 2008] code lists no limits for in-plane flexural tensile stress parallel to the bed joint. Equation 5 can be used to determine the maximum spans for various uninterrupted heights of veneer for a variety of veneer spans (anchor spacings) as shown in the Table. Shear stress is not critical, since calculations show brick sections will be able to support its own weight for spans over 50 feet without exceeding the MSJC code defined allowable shear stress of 37 psi. Examination of the Table indicates that the brick is likely to support itself in simple bending if there is a sufficient height of brick.

Once the loads and the effective length of the angle are determined, it is a simple matter to determine the thickness of the shelf angle using the simple frame model as described in Figure 3. Using the 4t product, an effective length of 16 inches of steel angle can be used to resist this loading (4 x 4 = 16).

If a 6-inch by 6-inch equal legged angle was used to support the veneer, the approximate angle loading shown in Figure 5 can be assumed.

To determine the thickness of angle needed, the veneer weight is often assumed to be applied at the end of the horizontal angle leg. As can be seen from the analysis presented above, a reasonable angle thickness and support spacing can be determined. The previously described design method requires that the masonry veneer remains intact over the assumed anchor spacing. The previous discussion presents a design method that can be used to design the vertical supports of masonry veneer wall systems.

Comments posted to STRUCTURE website do not constitute endorsement by NCSEA, CASE, SEI, C3 Ink, or the Editorial Board. STRUCTURE® magazine is a registered trademark of the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA). Web development and content management by C3 Ink™, a division of Copper Creek Companies, Inc. These exterior masonry veneers are non load-bearing and are usually assumed to be little more than an exterior finish of the building envelope.

Typically, these backing wall systems can include sheathed wood, steel stud walls or concrete masonry walls. The provisions in this standard describe two methods for veneer design, although the prescriptive method is used almost exclusively in North America. These assumptions vary from assuming that the steel angles span in simple bending between anchor points while supporting a uniformly distributed dead load, to assuming the angle legs act as a bolted frame with a vertical dead load applied to the end of the horizontal leg (Figure 3).

However, the author has conducted a number of finite element analyses on these systems during the course of failure investigations and retrofit studies, and the results of these analyses suggest a pattern of behavior that can be used to design shelf angles using more approximate analysis techniques. Thus, the shelf angle provides much less support away from the anchors as the angle twists away from the slab edge or shear plate connectors.

Just how far a given height of veneer can span can be determined by applying the rational design methods described in the MSJC provisions. For example, if it is assumed that the dead load of a nominal 4-inch clay brick veneer produces a maximum vertical uniform load of 40 psf for a unit area of the wall face, then a uniform load (w) of 40 x height of brick above the angle must be resisted by the veneer acting as a beam. Even a 1-foot height of brick can span significant anchor spacings, although the lower heights of brick can easily be assumed to be supported by the angle even though the relative stiffnesses would suggest the brick will carry most of the load.

In addition to acting as a form for the veneer and providing support to flashings and other wall systems, the angle must transfer the veneer loads to the structural support through the anchors. This condition will never happen since the angle will deform, forcing the effective loading point closer to the angle heal. Note that that eccentricity used in the above calculation has a significant impact on the thickness of the angle and will vary depending on the angle and cavity configuration.

Equilibrium would suggest that the vertical leg would have to resist the same moment at the junction of the two legs, as well as the tension force produced by the shear force at the connection. Deflections of the angles are not limited, since these deflections will occur as the wall is being constructed.

It should be noted that this design methodology is based on a number of conservative assumptions and is likely to result in conservative designs in most typical design conditions. I want to add some steel shelves to my garage but I wasn’t sure how to design the shelf angle. It engages, enlightens, and empowers structural engineers through interesting, informative, and inspirational content. Using prescriptive design methods, masonry veneer can be supported vertically by foundations for heights less than 30 feet, or supported by the building frame for taller structures. In these prescriptive design requirements, veneer backed by steel or wood stud wall systems over 30 feet in height must be supported at each floor level. Since angles have little torsional resistance they will rotate away from the slab, forcing greater loading on the angle sections near the anchors and may result in undersized shelf angle designs. The veneer can be modeled using plates elements, the ties modeled as axial elements and the stud backing modeled as beam elements. Away from the anchors, the steel angle provides much less support and the veneer is essentially acting as a beam, transferring the veneer dead load to the stiffer angle section near each anchor. Even though the allowable in-plane flexural tensile stresses parallel to the bed joints may be even higher than these values, the following analysis conservatively uses the lowest allowable out-of-plane strength value of 15 psi (solid masonry, Type N masonry cement Mortar). This lower Ft value is presented to illustrate that even if there is some question about the long term strength of the veneer, it can span a significant distance for even very low strength values.

The anchor spacing is thus likely to be determined by the anchor capacity for larger heights of veneer, although care must be exercised to account for any movement joints in the veneer to ensure they are not causing a break in the continuity of the veneer in locations that might over stress the veneer. The tributary length of the veneer can be assumed equal to the span of the veneer used to determine the anchor spacing, and will include the additional weight of the shelf angle. In most cases, it would be reasonable and conservative to assume that the veneer weight is applied in the center of the veneer.

For this case, the tension stress on the same effective length of the angle would be less than 500 psi (less than 2% of the capacity) and can safely be ignored. The purpose of the deflection limits in masonry design standards is to preclude excessive cracking of the hardened unreinforced masonry. Even if the brick does crack, however, there will likely be at most two sections of brick acting over a given span. The purpose of this article is to discuss the design of the vertical support of masonry veneers and how this design might be attempted under the current building code provisions.

The veneer wythe is most commonly constructed using units of clay or concrete masonry, bound together by mortar. Even though not required for other backing systems, masonry veneer wall systems are routinely also designed to be supported at each floor level to limit differential movement problems. In steel structural systems, the shelf angle can also be attached to the spandrel beams directly using shear plates as shown in Figure 2. Even though the frame model is more accurate and generally conservative, it also ignores the interaction of the brick and the shelf angle. Using this behavior as a guide suggests that a reasonable design approach would be to assume that the veneer will act as a beam spanning horizontally in-plane between anchors. It should also be noted that the allowable flexural stress values in the 2011 version of the MSJC masonry code have been increased from the values described above, and even longer spans can be accommodated if these provisions are used. Furthermore, much longer spans can be realized if bed joint reinforcing is included in the veneer as these wires will allow the brick to act as a reinforced masonry beam.

The effective length of the angle resisting the veneer loading is a little more difficult to determine.

If this assumption is used and it is assumed that a 2-inch cavity is present, then a moment on the lower leg would be Mmax = 4.19 in. The vertical leg and horizontal leg would be designed for the same moment and thus be the same size. As these angle deflections occur primarily before the masonry sets up, they can usually be ignored. Reprinting or other use of these materials without express permission of NCSEA is prohibited. In addition, the frame model requires assumptions be made relative to the effective width of the angle and tributary length wall. Connection detailing, height of veneer, length of angle legs and angle thickness will all affect how much of the angle is effectively resisting these reactions. The thickness of the angle is highly dependent on these two assumptions, and designs often result in high angle thicknesses, especially as designers react to the higher insulation requirements of the new energy codes with longer angle lengths.

However, assuming that the effective length of the angle is 4 x (the nominal veneer unit thickness) has given reasonable results and appears to be supported by the results of the finite element analysis.

McGinley is an expert in masonry building systems, in particular, masonry building envelopes.

This 4 x (the nominal veneer thickness) product was also used to determine the effective length of masonry wall under concentrated loads in older versions of the masonry standard, and thus has been used to describe effective width of steel and masonry systems in the past.

To design the veneer as a beam, the allowable stress design procedures described in the masonry standards can be used. If it is assumed that the brick supports itself over the anchor spacing in simple elastic bending, then the critical maximum flexural stress (ft) produced by the moment (Mmax) must be limited to an allowable flexural tensile value (Ft).

The Masonry Standards Joint Committee [MSJC, 2008] code lists no limits for in-plane flexural tensile stress parallel to the bed joint. Equation 5 can be used to determine the maximum spans for various uninterrupted heights of veneer for a variety of veneer spans (anchor spacings) as shown in the Table. Shear stress is not critical, since calculations show brick sections will be able to support its own weight for spans over 50 feet without exceeding the MSJC code defined allowable shear stress of 37 psi. Examination of the Table indicates that the brick is likely to support itself in simple bending if there is a sufficient height of brick.

Once the loads and the effective length of the angle are determined, it is a simple matter to determine the thickness of the shelf angle using the simple frame model as described in Figure 3. Using the 4t product, an effective length of 16 inches of steel angle can be used to resist this loading (4 x 4 = 16).

If a 6-inch by 6-inch equal legged angle was used to support the veneer, the approximate angle loading shown in Figure 5 can be assumed.

To determine the thickness of angle needed, the veneer weight is often assumed to be applied at the end of the horizontal angle leg. As can be seen from the analysis presented above, a reasonable angle thickness and support spacing can be determined. The previously described design method requires that the masonry veneer remains intact over the assumed anchor spacing. The previous discussion presents a design method that can be used to design the vertical supports of masonry veneer wall systems.

Comments posted to STRUCTURE website do not constitute endorsement by NCSEA, CASE, SEI, C3 Ink, or the Editorial Board. STRUCTURE® magazine is a registered trademark of the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA). Web development and content management by C3 Ink™, a division of Copper Creek Companies, Inc. These exterior masonry veneers are non load-bearing and are usually assumed to be little more than an exterior finish of the building envelope.

Typically, these backing wall systems can include sheathed wood, steel stud walls or concrete masonry walls. The provisions in this standard describe two methods for veneer design, although the prescriptive method is used almost exclusively in North America. These assumptions vary from assuming that the steel angles span in simple bending between anchor points while supporting a uniformly distributed dead load, to assuming the angle legs act as a bolted frame with a vertical dead load applied to the end of the horizontal leg (Figure 3).

However, the author has conducted a number of finite element analyses on these systems during the course of failure investigations and retrofit studies, and the results of these analyses suggest a pattern of behavior that can be used to design shelf angles using more approximate analysis techniques. Thus, the shelf angle provides much less support away from the anchors as the angle twists away from the slab edge or shear plate connectors.

Just how far a given height of veneer can span can be determined by applying the rational design methods described in the MSJC provisions. For example, if it is assumed that the dead load of a nominal 4-inch clay brick veneer produces a maximum vertical uniform load of 40 psf for a unit area of the wall face, then a uniform load (w) of 40 x height of brick above the angle must be resisted by the veneer acting as a beam. Even a 1-foot height of brick can span significant anchor spacings, although the lower heights of brick can easily be assumed to be supported by the angle even though the relative stiffnesses would suggest the brick will carry most of the load.

In addition to acting as a form for the veneer and providing support to flashings and other wall systems, the angle must transfer the veneer loads to the structural support through the anchors. This condition will never happen since the angle will deform, forcing the effective loading point closer to the angle heal. Note that that eccentricity used in the above calculation has a significant impact on the thickness of the angle and will vary depending on the angle and cavity configuration.

Equilibrium would suggest that the vertical leg would have to resist the same moment at the junction of the two legs, as well as the tension force produced by the shear force at the connection. Deflections of the angles are not limited, since these deflections will occur as the wall is being constructed.

It should be noted that this design methodology is based on a number of conservative assumptions and is likely to result in conservative designs in most typical design conditions. I want to add some steel shelves to my garage but I wasn’t sure how to design the shelf angle. It engages, enlightens, and empowers structural engineers through interesting, informative, and inspirational content. Using prescriptive design methods, masonry veneer can be supported vertically by foundations for heights less than 30 feet, or supported by the building frame for taller structures. In these prescriptive design requirements, veneer backed by steel or wood stud wall systems over 30 feet in height must be supported at each floor level. Since angles have little torsional resistance they will rotate away from the slab, forcing greater loading on the angle sections near the anchors and may result in undersized shelf angle designs. The veneer can be modeled using plates elements, the ties modeled as axial elements and the stud backing modeled as beam elements. Away from the anchors, the steel angle provides much less support and the veneer is essentially acting as a beam, transferring the veneer dead load to the stiffer angle section near each anchor. Even though the allowable in-plane flexural tensile stresses parallel to the bed joints may be even higher than these values, the following analysis conservatively uses the lowest allowable out-of-plane strength value of 15 psi (solid masonry, Type N masonry cement Mortar). This lower Ft value is presented to illustrate that even if there is some question about the long term strength of the veneer, it can span a significant distance for even very low strength values.

The anchor spacing is thus likely to be determined by the anchor capacity for larger heights of veneer, although care must be exercised to account for any movement joints in the veneer to ensure they are not causing a break in the continuity of the veneer in locations that might over stress the veneer. The tributary length of the veneer can be assumed equal to the span of the veneer used to determine the anchor spacing, and will include the additional weight of the shelf angle. In most cases, it would be reasonable and conservative to assume that the veneer weight is applied in the center of the veneer.

For this case, the tension stress on the same effective length of the angle would be less than 500 psi (less than 2% of the capacity) and can safely be ignored. The purpose of the deflection limits in masonry design standards is to preclude excessive cracking of the hardened unreinforced masonry. Even if the brick does crack, however, there will likely be at most two sections of brick acting over a given span. The purpose of this article is to discuss the design of the vertical support of masonry veneers and how this design might be attempted under the current building code provisions.

The veneer wythe is most commonly constructed using units of clay or concrete masonry, bound together by mortar. Even though not required for other backing systems, masonry veneer wall systems are routinely also designed to be supported at each floor level to limit differential movement problems. In steel structural systems, the shelf angle can also be attached to the spandrel beams directly using shear plates as shown in Figure 2. Even though the frame model is more accurate and generally conservative, it also ignores the interaction of the brick and the shelf angle. Using this behavior as a guide suggests that a reasonable design approach would be to assume that the veneer will act as a beam spanning horizontally in-plane between anchors. It should also be noted that the allowable flexural stress values in the 2011 version of the MSJC masonry code have been increased from the values described above, and even longer spans can be accommodated if these provisions are used. Furthermore, much longer spans can be realized if bed joint reinforcing is included in the veneer as these wires will allow the brick to act as a reinforced masonry beam.

The effective length of the angle resisting the veneer loading is a little more difficult to determine.

If this assumption is used and it is assumed that a 2-inch cavity is present, then a moment on the lower leg would be Mmax = 4.19 in. The vertical leg and horizontal leg would be designed for the same moment and thus be the same size. As these angle deflections occur primarily before the masonry sets up, they can usually be ignored. Reprinting or other use of these materials without express permission of NCSEA is prohibited. In addition, the frame model requires assumptions be made relative to the effective width of the angle and tributary length wall. Connection detailing, height of veneer, length of angle legs and angle thickness will all affect how much of the angle is effectively resisting these reactions. The thickness of the angle is highly dependent on these two assumptions, and designs often result in high angle thicknesses, especially as designers react to the higher insulation requirements of the new energy codes with longer angle lengths.

However, assuming that the effective length of the angle is 4 x (the nominal veneer unit thickness) has given reasonable results and appears to be supported by the results of the finite element analysis.

McGinley is an expert in masonry building systems, in particular, masonry building envelopes.

This 4 x (the nominal veneer thickness) product was also used to determine the effective length of masonry wall under concentrated loads in older versions of the masonry standard, and thus has been used to describe effective width of steel and masonry systems in the past.

Cloud server cost in india flipkart Make a clouds in maya wikipedia Cloud backup for enterprise |

Cloud storage replaces workarounds such as emailing backed up onto.

Camera and select Optimize iPhone our.

Employees to start saving in the cloud rather than on their necessary.