EC2: Elastic Computer Cloud allows us to rent virtual computers on which to run our own computer applications.
SDK: Software Development Kit is a group of tools and features that expand our programming possibilities integrating Amazon AWS.
EBS: Elastic Block Store provides block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances. S3: Simple Storage Service provides a simple web services interface that can be used to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. RDS: Relational Database Service is a web service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. CloudWatch: It provides monitoring for AWS cloud resources and the applications customers run on AWS. Your comparison is valid, as long as you do not care about performance of your SQL database. Does either of them offer a solution where the database resides on premise and only the application processing sits out of the cloud? Yes - you can create virtual networks and connect them to on-premise VPN devices allowing you to have your cloud services connect to internal resources, like databases and even Active Directory. This application should be capable of uploading files to a storage server and displaying them once the process is completed.
I used R53 to point my domain name to the web server where my application was hosted; in my case an EC2 virtual server. It gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. We can use SQS to transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available.
Besides pushing directly to mobile devices, SNS can also deliver notifications by SMS text message or email.


I used it to monitor resource utilization, application performance, metrics and costs message. When files are fully uploaded, the systems sends a message to the code in order to publish the latest upload and an email is sent to me as log. Este servicio tambien puede enviar notificaciones por mensaje de texto SMS o correo electronico al servicio SQS tambien de Amazon, o cualquier otro extremo HTTP. Click here to access this blog post. As my journey to the cloud continues, many people have asked me whether or not Amazon AWS was more expensive than Windows Azure. But a lack of performance SLA doesn't prevent thousands of successful real-world applications from running just fine in Windows Azure. Requests for our content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.
This service works well together with CloudFront distributing the contents to edge locations.
In my case, I used it to send complete messages between file upload process and my PHP application. As you can imagine comparing pricing alone can be very deceiving because there are various gaps in the service offering of both providers. I am able of supplying a fully functional and scalable application when integrating those services.
If we’d like to change our videos color or watermark them on upload process, we should be using this service as well, as it is a good way of warning Amazon services between them. So I would like to disclose right away that comparing pricing between cloud providers must be taken as just one data point for choosing your cloud provider. My main goal here is to explain how I integrated AWS for this purpose: Route 53, EC2, SDK, EBS, CloudFront, S3, RDS, SQS, SNS and CloudWatch. Note however that the Licensing Included model of Amazon does not provide the ability to run other services, like SSRS or SSIS, which is fine because this compares nicely with Windows Azure SQL Database.


Still this was the closest database service in terms of features and capabilities between Amazon and Microsoft.
Regarding the websites, I chose to use the EC2 Small and Medium on-demand instances for Windows. And for the reporting services environment, I chose to use the free SQL Express edition of SQL Server, which includes basic, but sufficient SSRS capabilities.
I also selected the Windows Azure Reporting Service as the reporting mechanism in Windows Azure; there really isn’t another choice right now in Windows Azure, although this may change in the future. The Reporting Service in Azure does not provide all the features that a full-blown reporting service would offer, so although the pricing is important, as I mentioned earlier, you need to make sure the feature sets are sufficient for your needs. As mentioned earlier, this price difference comes with multiple service differences as well, some of which favor the Microsoft Azure platform, while others favor the Amazon platform. It is interesting however to note that the major difference in price is related to the database platform price, as shown in the graph below. Because SQL Database is a full Platform as a Service offering Microsoft is able to offer a significant price break on that service compared to Amazon. However, Microsoft Azure doesn’t yet offer the flexibility of configuration that RDS can offer for higher throughput requirements, so as long as SQL Database can deliver the required performance levels of your applications, Windows Azure may be noticeably less expensive.  This post is specifically looking at a simple website configuration with limited throughput and processing requirements and does not intend to make a general statement regarding Amazon AWS and Windows Azure. Herve's experience includes software development, architecture, database administration and senior management with both global corporations and startup companies.



Cloud free disk space 99
Low price cloud storage youtube
Cloud and company menu salamanca ny casino
How to backup an iphone 6 to icloud solucion


Comments

  1. 11.11.2015 at 17:23:27


    Stored online in your cloud storage lightweight.

    Author: Ramin4ik
  2. 11.11.2015 at 17:33:21


    For clients back in 2004 long before the storage vendors are eager and describes how.

    Author: BHB
  3. 11.11.2015 at 13:43:40


    Files you can upload, but each file used in combination with local backups.

    Author: BRIQADIR
  4. 11.11.2015 at 12:32:14


    Will be shipped the next because it adds a folder.

    Author: SamiR
  5. 11.11.2015 at 19:18:58


    Help you quickly identify many more.

    Author: Delete1