Robert dilts model of alignment,how to make money selling drugs 1channel,i want a girlfriend but can't get one outs - You Shoud Know

30.07.2015
My recent post about Technologies of the Self got me thinking about Robert Dilts' hierarchical model of 'neurological levels'. The general response within the NLP literature itself seems to be to critique various aspects of the model at a theoretical level, and then say: but it's still quite a useful way to think about this. So, my instinct is to see this as a model that has been inferred inductively from experience of working with human beings, and as such can offer some useful ways to think about how people learn and how people change.
Second, it reminds me that, whilst discussion and explanation may be the most direct routes to address what's going on in someone's head, it's not a real change unless it is also manifest in behaviour. Now, some critiques of the model from within the NLP literature take issue with the hierarchical structure, either in detail or in total.
But I think the original notion that some of the elements run deeper, and have a more pervasive influence than others in our sense of self and ways of being in the world is a useful aspect of the model. Dilts and his ilk essentially bring a set of project-management tools to the project of the self. Many Practitioner programmes are generic or therapeutic in context.You will learn all the skills and necessary techniques for the practitioner qualification with the added benefit of discovering how these apply to learning.
On a recent trip to Rome and having route marched our way around the various sights, I sat with friends in the Piazza di Ponte Sant’Angelo with a glass of wine as the world went by.
As we sat and people watched, the conversation reverted back to a previous one about just how stylish Italians are and how they always look immaculate and full of confidence. Whether they are popping out for a paper, a coffee, going to work or in any other aspect of their everyday lives they always seem to be at their best.
I’m sure there are exceptions to the rule, however most Italians seem to have a very clear idea of themselves and their Personal Brand. Italians may dress impeccably, however more than this they exude flair and self-confidence, capturing your attention through their body language, expressiveness and sense of who they are. Some new managers do apply an element of the approach by buying a new car, or at the very least a new suit so they look the part. David Beckham, Katie Price, Margaret Thatcher whether we love them or loathe them all appear to have this sense of self. We all have our professional facades, our poker faces or whatever you want to call them, however these can shatter when our world is rocked, or we are challenged, shocked, surprised or scared in the situation we find ourselves in.
When analysing the situation we may consider if it was the environment that made us react the way we did. Sometimes it can be far more deep rooted than this and we need to look beyond the first 3 levels to understand and learn from the experience. Ask yourself whether it was your beliefs and values that were challenged or were not being fulfilled enough (level 4)?
Recognising underlying issues and having the right tools and techniques to plan for, and deal with situations head on ensures we stay true to ourselves and effective in our roles. Here’s one that took my attention whilst mulling over what make’s Italians so very stylish. What Nugget of Wisdom In Part 3 of These Robert Dilts Conversational Magic Notes Will Prove Most Valuable To Your Life Now? What has been covered so far in this seminar and in Part 1 and Part 2 of these notes is how words and the way words are delivered can influence and transform our lives for the better or for the worse.
Beliefs and values are the gateway between our identity and our sense of purpose and vision and what we believe to be possible. Belief that something desirable is possible for you to have is most necessary to have when something isn’t real yet. What you saw in the previous notes, and will continue to see today is that the language that people who have influenced massive social change address beliefs in their speeches. Transforming beliefs conversationally can be thought of as Sleight of Mouth which a play on the term Sleight of Hand. This a form of verbal magic – using words to frame or reframe situations, to channel our attention, our capabilities, and our actions in a certain direction. Animals have eyes and ears and some primates have a verbal language and the ability to work with symbols but not on the magical level of human beings. Think about how with fiction novels like The Hobbit or Game of Thrones create an entire reality with just a bunch of marks on pieces of paper, or the screen. So a Proper Name for an experience honors the truth of a situation and at the same time it is able to keeps us in a resourceful state of mind all while honoring the positive intention behind our behaviors.
Think about how if someone does something that harms you, one of the easiest things for you to do is to label it in a way that puts you in a shitty state of mind, blames the other person and exaggerates the situation.
Marshall Rosenberg has made a study of this and if you’re prone to being a hot head and you get yourself in trouble because of it, I highly encourage you to go check him out.
It is all about putting a name to what is going on that doesn’t vilify the other person and serves the purpose of keeping you resourceful.
In the coming sections of notes, we’ll look at examples of people like Milton Erickson, Jesus, Abraham Lincoln, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.


When it comes to hitting the ball, in practice, they break down each aspect of the swing – where your feet are supposed to be, where your elbows are supposed to be, where your hands are supposed to be, etc. They hammer on all of this to get the right patterns into the muscle and then when game time comes, they give the simple of instruction of “See ball. If you do the practice, you can stream line what you focus and tap into your unconscious competence when game time comes.
You want to know about everything you’re learning here but you don’t want to be trying to rummage it up in your mind when you’re communicating.
The main thing you want to be concerned with is moving people – friends, family, your perfect prospects – from their present state to a desired state of theirs. Everything starts with you needing to have a rock solid belief in something, a vision for where you want to be, a stretch goal.
Now when you’re going through the process of making sure you feel capable, worthy, and that the goal is desirable, shit beliefs are going to surface. And you need to be able to reframe these beliefs for yourself and for others so that you aren’t getting in your own way. A belief system has to do with the necessity to reframe beliefs around desire, capability, worthiness, and possibility. When Robert Dilts’ mother first got the news that she had Stage 5 cancer, the doctors also told her that there was no way to treat it and that there was nothing they could do for her besides keeping her “comfortable”. So Robert in wanting to help his mother started at the beginning of where any NLP work often starts which is, “What is the desired state of the person you’re working with?
When he asked her what she wanted, she told him that this was a ridiculous question because there is no future. So the first belief to address was that of there being a possibility of her getting better – the what.
Robert didn’t get to this by telling her she was wrong for believing what she didn’t have a future. She was tentative at first and Robert would take her answers and ask, “What would it look like, what would it sound like, what would it feel like,” in order to build a representation. As she started to be able to see, hear, and feel something this future seemed more real and possible to attain.
The next part of the belief system to address was capability because she didn’t believe that she could do it.
She could acknowledge a desired state but she still had to consider her present state and whether she could get there or not.
So she was in a similar place as NASA was when they were tasked with getting a man on the moon. One thing she remembered is that his little brother, when he was little, he was diagnosed with muscular dystrophy. She was told as a young mother that he wouldn’t survive to be 10 or 11 because there was no cure for this degenerative disease. A couple of months later when the doctor was running some tests on his brother, they came to the conclusion that they’d mis-diagnosed him and his brother is still alive to this day. Another instance she thought of was when her father had been diagnosed with having adult onset diabetes and had been given six months to live and he made the decision to do what it would take to extend his life as long as possible for the sake of his young children. Those were two capability reference experiences – this one reminding her that a change in lifestyle can radically reverse the onset of disease.
Her mother was told that there was something wrong with her reproductive system and that she couldn’t have Robert’s mother and that if she tried, that the baby as well as she, would die. Robert’s grandmother made the decision that she didn’t want to abort her child and decided to go through the whole pregnancy and trust and accept whatever consequences came.
Nobody could ever explain it but by Robert’s mom being birthed, it somehow fixed the problem and she had his mom easily and went on to have three other children. That was a third capability reference that served as an example of going beyond what the doctors say the reality of the situation was. Thinking of these examples gave her a sense of confidence but the next obstacle that reared its ugly head had to do with her feeling of worthiness. This lead to Robert’s mother having this non-rational feeling that because this runs in their family that if she didn’t die of breast cancer, she was in a way being disloyal to those in her family that had. Think about how Pat had to look to the future in order to be open to the possibility of her getting better. What made this different was that this wasn’t a case where he could just tell her to take that picture in her mind and make it smaller and move it away. When considered in this context, it became alarmingly and obviously clear to her that she wouldn’t want her daughter to think she had to die of breast cancer like her – to essentially point the bone at her like the witch doctors do and sentence her to death with how she handled this situation. That probably wasn’t what her mother or her sister wanted for her either but they didn’t serve as examples of what was possible in this situation.
She decided she wanted to change the pattern of what to be loyal to and what to be a role model for.


And yet in that moment she decided to do her best to be a positive example for her daughter by placing her focus on a positive future and go balls to wall with trying out a different strategy to keep herself alive and well.
So look at the Pat Dilts story and how this was a system of beliefs that needed to be addressed. So not only are you dealing with differing degrees of beliefs but you are also dealing with different parts of the body they dwell in. I trust these valuable insights are already affecting the way you look at how to convince yourself and your perfect prospects that change is possible. Stay tuned for the next part of these notes to see even more examples of how some very influential people have artfully addressed the limiting beliefs of their audiences of one or many.
If you look at the 4 rules of thumb, you will begin to realize that the logical levels of NLP will actually be able to not only give you a better understanding of which layer each specific pattern operates on, but also help you with which tool to select. I mentioned this in passing in my post on neurolinguistic programming back in the autumn as something I've been thinking about blogging about for ages. In particular, it seems to me that the designation that this refers to 'neurological' levels is under-substantiated at best.
And this is partly why I find the pyramid a good short-hand diagram for Foucault's Technologies of the Self. Most importantly your will learn with humour and laughter, easily and enjoyably and learn how to pass your enjoyment to others. It’s about demonstrating your credibility, being consistent in your behaviour and demonstrating your leadership style in the decisions you make and inspiring others to follow your lead. Whether it was the person we were dealing with that pushed our buttons or a lack of skills or knowledge that stressed us out.
Did the experience clash with how you think of yourself and made you react the way in which you did (level 5)?
This means that the type of labels we choose to put upon our experiences, influences what we associate to them thus affecting how we feel about them. They’re merely here to be deposited into your mind so that your intuition can adapt them when you need them. This is the place from which you and do and say brilliant things that you would have never have imagined yourself doing before. They could imagine what it would be like, but they’d never done it before so they didn’t have a reference for how it should be done.
For her to know she was capable of beating breast cancer, she had to look to the past to similar experiences. We determine our values, set our goals, design tasks, milestones and propel ourselves forward into change. Well, the time has come, because I think it offers quite a useful way to think about these 'technologies' from a practical perspective, rather than the theoretical context Foucault was working in. It consists of a series of levels, each of which is constituted from, while also constraining, the one below. Is it simply technique, a physical bad habit (behaviour), or is it their beliefs about how to practise? A kinder heart shows in being nicer to others; a more integrated sense of phrase shows in a more seamless legato.
Or did the situation conflict with your aspirations or underlying purpose in life (level 6)? So the only thing I’d like to have you do is before you make any decision, is to look at least as far into the future as you’re looking into the past. I have a compelling desire within that drives me to have answers to business & life questions so that I can be a “Go-To” guy for myself, family, and YOU.
What is important to keep in mind is that change has a logical hierarchy … not just for NLP based change, but for any change. Though it is common to learn how to do a parts integration, it is less common to learn how to do core change work, deep values based work, and bringing those on to a deeper level of timeline work. Hence, your capabilities define which behaviours you are able to engage in, but are also made up from your behaviours to date. Or is it that they like to think of themselves as good at this kind of thing and so won't accept emotionally that they need to unlearn and relearn fundamental aspects of their craft? Now, those of us versed in Schenkerian analysis are quite comfortable with a degree of tangling up in our hierarchies, so I'm not too bothered if the elements sometimes seem to jiggle about a bit. It is ideal to know these logical levels and to ask the right (meta model) questions in designing an action plan.



How do you make money on webkinz
How to send message using internet to cell phone
Alpha male team clothing australia
I love u text message art


Comments to «Robert dilts model of alignment»

  1. Kavaler writes:
    Than a guy pretending to be somebody textual content my girl a joke into action with.
  2. FARIDE writes:
    Can occur with out males getting drawn to a girl with as a man.
  3. WANTED writes:
    Requires full absolute concentration on your part deleting.
  4. 21 writes:
    Secretly read there conversations, the woman is sharing.