The EOTech LBC added a bit of width on both sides to the 500 series holographic weapon sight.
Another limitation with the LBC arrangement is that if the shooter is using the C-clamp type hand hold, that may block one of the laser. Overall, the EOTech LBC module is a good add-on to expand the capability of the EOTech sight and the weapon. I can understand the purpose of the infrared laser, but what’s the point of a red laser when you’re already running a holographic sight? Also, perhaps it is meant to be an aid when they can’t get the weapon properly shouldered? If they are co-aligned, having a visible laser makes sight-in of the IR laser infinitely more user-friendly.
I have seriously considered just removing the handguard on my AK, I mean, I don’t use it. The product manuals on the EOTech website don’t show separate or additional batteries for this product versus the stock optics. Eotech xps20 holographic weapon sight 68 moa circle 1 moa, Eotech xps20 holographic weapon sight 68 moa circle with 1 moa dot reticle matte cr123 battery. In this post we’re going to take an in depth look at what are the key factors that differentiate these optics, and compare two of their flagship models to see how they tack up against eachother. The reason Aimpoints and EOTechs are compared so often to eachother is because they have both built a reputation of being high-quality, high-performance sights. They are two of the most recognizable brand names in optics and have large, dedicated user bases that include military, law enforcement, and civilian shooters who swear by their products.
At the most basic level, what they have in common is being weapons mounted electronic sights that provide shooters an illuminated reticle to target with. Specs like size, weight, and dimensions are important to compare between sights for considering how it will work and fit with your particular setup. Both of these sights are mountable to Weaver or Picatinny rails, making them compatible with all modern day assault and battle rifles. Aimpoints have a tube style optical configuration, consisting of a cylindrical housing with front and rear lens objective lens. EOTechs have an open style optical configuration, which is simply a flat rectangular objective window surrounded by a protective housing. The rectangle shape of the EOTech objective is unique to their brand, and something shooters who have only dealt with cylindrical scopes. One of the biggest differences EOTech vs Aimpoint sights the projection system that is used to create the illuminated reticle within the optic. Both sights are near parallax free, meaning they reticle will stay overlayed on the target even as the shooters eye moves location. Reticle pattern can make a big difference in accuracy of shots and target acquisition speed, especially when dealing with non-magnified optics. Pattern size and shape can vary from manufacturer to manufacturer and in between their sight models.


The Aimpoint PRO has the traditional pattern that is found in most reflex sights, simply a centered dot reticle.
On the other hand, EOTechs are well known for their unique reticle pattern that you won’t find anywhere else. The ring makes for quick target acquisition because it is very easy to catch with your eyes as the gun is being brought into the sight line.
As we’ve shown there are a few factors that highlight the differences in the Aimpoint vs EOTech debate. However, thats just looking at a few metrics, but what really needs to be considered are the subjective factors that vary from user to user. So if you’re shopping around between an Aimpoint and EOTech, know that the best choice is the one that makes your shots more accurate, your speed increase, and your groupings tighter. Get out there and do some testing, ask other shooters about, and form your own opinions knowing that everyone else’s are formed by their individual experiences that differ from yours. You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website.
The installation is extremely simple by just lifting up the locking lever in the middle, then remove the stock battery cap and replaced it with the LBC. Although the laser must be zeroed independently of the sight, unlike the more intricate single adjustment system used on the Meprolight MOR  that syncs both the sight and the laser together. The visible laser is on the right side of the LBC 2 dual laser model and it features a red laser that’s usable indoor or at low light.
It’s seems to be well made and at half the price as most affordable Laser Device discrete laser designator models.
A five year combat veteran of the US Marine Corps, Tim is also part of Point & Shoot Media Works, a producer of photography, video and web media for the firearms and shooting sport industry.
I suppose Im a mutant then, I actually prefer to use a stubby VFG like the BCM or MOE (which is currently on my Frankenrifle). The weight you save in not having a separate laser disappears with all of the extra batteries you’ll need to prevent your primary sight from flickering out. This tactical optic is easiest for businesses that need the most efficient in CQB pace and flexibility, with out the will for Evening Imaginative and prescient compatibility.
Their popularity comes from users who have seen their accuracy, speed, and consistency improve with one equipped. However, Aimpoints will need a specific mount and riser for each one, which is sold separately. This method utilizes an internal LED that shines light onto the front lens acting as a partial mirror. In this method a laser diode infront of the optical window illuminates a holographic reticle that is etched into the window itself. Since there is no need for a curved, mirrored lens it means that the objective window can have a rectangular shape and be perfectly clear glass.


Since laser diodes eat up a lot more energy than LEDs, there is clear advantage for reflex sights in this case. Shooters can also operate these sights with both eyes open, allowing them ultimate situational awareness to their surroundings. These factors can be optimized for different situations, like longer distance shots or CQC.
At 2 MOA, this reticle provides a small aimpoint that allows for accurate shot placement, and limited bullet spread out to a couple hundred yards. At 15 yards the ring covers 10 inches in diameter, a solid area of the average human target, making it ideal for CQC situations. They can not only reproduce the Aimpoint’s capabilities, but take it further with the additional 65 MOA ring.
Knowing this, can we determine which one is ‘better’ and put and end to the dicussion? The both provide excellent sighting solutions for most weapons and have shown that through broad military and civilian adoption.
Their unique form, projection system, and reticle combine to make a sight that edges out Aimpoints in most situations.
Just beneath each activation switch is an accessory port for plugging in the optional remote pressure switch (CLF-053-4). Im also proportionate, so I dont have arms like Andre the giant to facilitate some epic C clamping.
These are both well known and well tested sights that will showcase their differences well.
Its curve and focal length are designed so the reflected light narrows into the aimpoint that the shooter sees. They take the basics of what Aimpoints provide and expand the capabilities in different ways.
Just move the laser dot until it lines up with the center dot in the EOTech’s reticle. I wish EOTech would have included a protective plug for the accessory port and to cover up the shiny brass contact. I dont see why the accuracy would change much at all, the fundamentals are still the same even if your hand moves a foot or so forward.



Free online fps zombie survival games download
Erectile dysfunction 24 years old 1.b?l?m