Working through home on internet,law of attraction attracting love relationship,thoughts attitudes actions,how to be successful in beauty business hours - Plans Download

Author: admin, 31.12.2013. Category: The Power Of Thinking

Email us here if you have a cool site and want to become a friend, in a macho sort of dude type way.
All the preparation in the world will not matter if you do not also plan out the specific course of action you will take when a disaster strikes. The Family and Youth Services Bureau and its National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth work to end youth homelessness, teen pregnancy, and family violence. ErrorSorry!This page is currently unavailable while we undergo routine maintenance.We apologize for any inconvenience. As the American confederation was formed at the outset of the war, the American realms had begun to go through deep social change.
That being said, as the colonies moved forward in time, a new power structure was beginning to develop. No matter what reactionary libertarians and conservatives try to do to whitewash the history of their founders to meet the egalitarian vision of classical liberalism, the reality will always be brought to light by an ardent American leftism that hates its own founding. Undoubtedly there is a major intellectual disconnect between American patriots nowadays and the American patriots of the founding era. If we were to take Ron Paul and Ronald Reagan and place them at the time of the Founding Fathers, they would be horrified to find themselves run out of the Philadelphia convention as radical, ideological usurpers from a Parisian salon, with more in common with Thomas Paine than George Washington.
Quoting the Founding Fathers in American society is about as powerful and reckless as quoting the Bible out of context. So the question, then, for us patriots is: What did the Founders actually believe in regards to race, and why does it matter? George Washington, the “father” of the American Republic, was father not only in a symbolic sense, but also in a literal sense, living out a lifestyle of true paternalism towards blacks and the land as an aristocrat. It appears in the historical record that Washington did not wish to comment much on the slavery issue for pragmatic reasons, as he did not want to inflame an issue he knew could divide the country. Thomas Jefferson, the supposed libertarian patriarch who penned the greatest egalitarian phrase in mankind’s history, was anything but a true egalitarian. As Ambrose notes, Jefferson never took “the slightest interest in African ethnology or African vocabularies” and described blacks as lazy and prone to thievery. Unfortunately for Jefferson, his prospect of using Indians as frontier settlers of a grand economic confederation never became realized, as it was apparent that the red man could never be conformed to the behavior and lifestyle of the white man. For Jefferson, the expansion of the American republic into a continental “empire for liberty” was clearly based upon a white-dominated east, with a loyal, subservient, and enlightened Indian west; blacks would never enjoy full equality, as they could not inherently possess the requisite faculties to continue on the Anglo-Saxon legacy. Jefferson was very motivated to preserve the Anglo-Saxon heritage of the American people and their institutions. Benjamin Franklin endorsed a similar vision of expansion for Anglosaxondom, “wishing” that the numbers of Anglo-Saxons and Germans were to “increase” in North America to offset the large black and yellow populations in Africa and Asia respectively. There were many reasons for the War Between the States, no singular ideological faction having a monopoly on why it occurred. Many years before the war broke out, the nation was already beginning to discuss the abolition of slavery in a larger context of racial equality. The next reason assigned is, that either holding Mexico as a province, or incorporating her into the Union, would be unprecedented by any example in our history. Fortunately, Calhoun’s position prevailed, and Mexico was not included into the Union, only the predominantly white parts like Texas and the unsettled West. Though probably most Southerners were not fighting to protect the institution of slavery, as most Southerners did not own slaves, they were fighting to protect their land and heritage. Regardless of whatever policies were argued over through the war, the fundamental point was whether or not the previous lifestyle and age of Christian and white supremacy was to continue into the postbellum age.
It really makes one wonder: if the Founding Fathers espoused so much about equality and egalitarianism, why did they practice such un-egalitarian lives? To put it simply, the United States of the Founding Fathers has little in comparison with the contemporary United States. With its founding principles resting on religious authoritarianism and Caucasian supremacy, America is a white Christian nation. Rather than following the libertarian mantra that the Founders were fighting simply for liberty, we should instead support the Founders’ original vision: that America was destined to be an aristocratic, white Christian Republic.
America is currently wallowing in a depravity which is only worsening, amplified by the spiritual and metaphysical emptiness that curses every citizen in the nation.
The problem with this is that the Southern system of large-scale plantation slavery while economically successful in the lowland South, was of limited economic potential in the North and upland South, and in any case not desired by Northern whites who wanted a society based on smallholders that would be appropriate for Europeans living in a temperate climate. Christianity is egalitarian in that it holds all humans at the same moral and spiritual potential, in an ideal world, all men would be in perfect equality and peace. Equality, salvation and redemption belong to the next world, not this one, and christianity is free to be brutally honest about the realities of this world, which are social and racial inequality.
Egalitarianism is anti-Christian MARXISM, and it’s WRECKING the entire western world. About Faith and Heritage is a webzine presenting the views of Occidental Christians who are determined to preserve both Western Civilization and Western Peoples.
Whereas America was founded along Christian supremacist lines, that absolute power had broken down and fractured to the local level. With landed aristocracy in full force in an agrarian world, sustained in large part by slavery, laws and customs began to take root that formed America as a white supremacist society.
Therefore, it is time for American patriots to accept the reality that their Founders were Christian supremacists, white supremacists, aristocrats, and slave-owners who despised a genuine equality of the masses.


Genuine patriots, to prove they are not racist, intentionally plunge themselves into a world with no connection to their country’s founding. The fact of the matter is that modern American patriots care little for what their Founding Fathers actually believed in or lived out.
In one breath, a saying of Thomas Jefferson can support the politics and ideas of anybody from Barack Obama to Randy Weaver. In the Netherlands, for example, no matter how leftist we may become, the Dutch can always default back to some symbol or idea that definitely defines us as Dutch.
Not much exists which can prove Washington’s pro-white sympathies other than the fact that he owned non-whites and apparently felt so guilty about it that he never let them go until well after his death. Aristocratic by birth, Jefferson was a member of the landed gentry who ruled colonial Virginia and a prominent slave owner. It was because of the Indians’ sense of higher culture inside the tribe, along with their ability to heartily survive in a fashion very similar to ancient Europeans, that Jefferson possessed a misplaced passion for them. He maintained that American institutions could not be maintained apart from an appreciation of our ancestors who created them. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection, or of incorporating them into our Union.
Obviously, with the North’s victory, egalitarianism began to reign at the expense of the American nation. And furthermore, if they were so concerned about the equality of all peoples, why did they leave behind no call for some sort of social justice and expansion of the franchise? So long as we on the right never abandon this ancient identity and do not attempt to ignore or betray it, we provide a coherent and honest message to awaken and organize whites in America. This will make the history and consequently the mandated mission of America to become much clearer and more honest. If white nationalists begin to own up to the honest history of the United States and our American civilization at large, whites will be able to provide a clear, messianic vision for their race in America and provide for them the needed energy to resist Hispanicization and Zionism. Jan is a student of European history and reverences the great European conquests of the Americas. The abolitionists despised free soil whites, but free soil whites decided it was worth a war to maintain the West for themselves.
An ideology that views other people as inferior and not worthy of consideration cannot call itself Christian at all. F&H features a diverse range of opinions among its writers, and any particular opinion expressed is not necessarily indicative of universal agreement among F&H admins or writers. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. The most effective way to combat these destructive elements is to have a clear, comprehensive, well-practiced response plan in place. America was becoming a depository for “non-desirables” from Europe, such as Quakers, Mennonites, low-church Protestants, and Roman Catholics, along with Enlightenment thinkers and Freemasons.
Otherwise, conservatives, in trying to defend their country’s honor against leftist accusations of racism and bigotry, end up defending positions that do not exist. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison can all be used to justify anything from white supremacy to gay marriage – and they all have been so used. From the Belgaic tribes, to the Eighty Years’ War against Spain, to Calvinism, and to the Dutch resistance against the Nazis, we always have an absolute pillar of truth that can never be removed from our consciousness. Washington in his own writings lamented the slave trade, yet he held on to as many slaves as possible until, as he admits, he had just plain too many.
That being said, Washington ultimately proved his loyalty to the Virginia gentry class by signing the Fugitive Slave Act, guaranteeing that slaves would have no safe harbor in America. Though Jefferson did not approve of slavery as an institution, it had less to do with affection for blacks than it did with slavery’s economics. He worked for years on an Anglo-Saxon grammar book for university students and designed a seal with the two great Saxon warriors on it, Hengst and Horsa.
Calhoun was opposed to the inclusion of Mexico into the new American confederation not because of geopolitical concerns, but because of racial concerns. It was more for political rather than racial reasons that the Yankee states did not want the South to acquire any more land in its sphere, leading to the continued expansion of slavery. Since the Revolution, the Enlightenment and Unitarian tradition began to accelerate its proliferation throughout the North and manifest itself within the Transcendentalist movement.
The South was keenly aware of its Anglo-Celtic, Presbyterian way of life and did not want it tampered with by Northern Unitarianism, industrialism, and cosmopolitanism. It’s true, the founding fathers of the United Stated were no egalitarian on practice. This dumping of non-traditional religious stock began to dilute America’s intellectual framework; consequently, social and legal accommodations had to be made to sustain order in a much more pluralistic society.
Leftists charge that America was founded by racist whites for racist whites and that in the modern world we should feel very guilty for this, importing millions of third-worlders to prove we’re not racist. Modern patriots then respond by lauding the values of the Founding Fathers, yet without actually defending the coherent worldview they possessed that gave them their country.
If the American people genuinely cared, they would read the Anti-Federalist Papers, along with the quotes of Thomas Jefferson, and subsequently organize to rebel against the federal government and burn the U.S. I protest against the incorporation of such a people. Ours is the Government of the white man. The North began to view itself as the vanguard of the culmination of the American ideology of egalitarianism and modernity.


Though the average Northerner or average Southerner was hardly thinking of the greater philosophical implications of the war, the elites of these respective sides definitely were. The ruling Anglo-Saxon aristocratic class cared little for expanding the rights and benefits of citizenship beyond themselves to other whites, let alone blacks or Indians.
In addition to his work with the Tea Party, Jan has also worked significantly with other European parties such as the Dutch Freedom Party and the Vlaams Belang in Flanders. Fortunately, though, Christianity and its values still prevailed militantly throughout the society, with only a small number of intellectual bandits (mainly in Boston and Philadelphia) being allowed to write and publish their secularist works. Based on the changes of historical trends, American patriots are now defending what was leftism at the time of the War Between the States. Constitution as a failed document of tyranny – as was predicted by the anti-federalists. By contrast, in Europe, we are now exonerating our heroes and legends to revive the nation, rather than to apologize for it. Meanwhile in the South, the Anglo-Celtic, philosophically Christian establishment had changed little over the years since the founding of the South at Jamestown in 1607. In his free time, Jan enjoys hiking, reading and when in America, shooting guns and hunting.
The changes in the modern Western world into a more accepting and egalitarian culture shows how much society has evolved. Even the conservative or libertarian patriot cannot bring himself to accept the reality that the Founders were racist, aristocratic, anti-egalitarian, (often) pro-slavery conquerors who believed in establishing a Republican empire in the fashion of Rome. In fact, the egalitarian rhetoric that came out of the revolutionary era was more rooted in anti-British policies and ideas, relating to parliamentary representation, than to the establishment of a new world of total equality in terms of race or economic class. America needs an identity, and there is only one identity that could ever be truly American: the Caucasian Christian identity. And yet, with this example before them, and our uniform practice, there are those among us who talk about erecting these Mexicans into territorial Governments, and placing them on an equality with the people of these States.
Since the first Anglo-Saxons arrived in Dixie, they planted a tradition of landed gentry and high-church Protestantism that molded with the country, rather than revolutionized it, unlike the North, where industrialism, commercialism, mass immigration, and cosmopolitanism nearly exterminated the Puritan heritage of New England. Therefore, as proto-Marxism began to make its way into the mindset of Northern writers, artists, thinkers, and politicians, the clash over race and the question of racial equality was inevitable. It may, in the event of a blizzard or large-scale power outage, simply require that everyone should stay put and wait for the crisis to pass. It may also require aggressive action on the part of facility staff (for example, to put out a fire or resolve a medical emergency).
Consider the large-scale disasters that you selected in the previous chapter-which ones would require evacuation, and which ones would have you sheltering within the facility?On the next page, you will see a completed disaster response plan that uses the template found in Appendix H. This space is for breaking down, in as much detail as possible, the steps that you, your staff, and youth will take in response to the disaster at hand. The answer to the big question, in this case, is to remain in place—the staff and youth will take shelter in the facility safe room. While the on-duty support staff take responsibility for moving youth there and handing out critical supplies, the director (or lead staff person) takes responsibility for turning off the gas, closing exterior doors and windows, and shutting off lights. Once the entire facility population is in the safe room, they use their battery-powered radio to listen for weather updates; when the all-clear is announced, they leave the safe room and check the facility for damage. If the facility is no longer habitable, the local or regional evacuation plan comes into play.Below the procedures area is a space to list the critical supplies and resources that the specific disaster scenario demands. Since there is a possibility that an evacuation will be necessary in the wake of a tornado, this plan calls for distribution of all the facility’s Go-Bags. The first aid kit, if not already in the safe room, would be brought there as well, in addition to extra flashlights and a battery-powered radio for listening to weather updates as they are broadcast.The area below the supplies and resources section is for listing emergency contact information that applies to the specific disaster scenario. For example, a response plan for a medical emergency might list the local fire, rescue squad, and police emergency numbers. Since the only real response to a tornado involves sheltering and riding it out, there is no number listed here.The final area on the form is for detailing the recovery processes that will help return life to normal when the disaster is over. Review everything you’ve done so far and consider your facility, your resources, and your staff. No one plan can account for every possible nuance of every disaster—the best you can hope for is that, by taking the time to anticipate your response, you will be prepared to handle any situation when it arises. But take a few moments now to walk through the fire response plan above.Obviously, the answer to the big question here is evacuation.
The first step requires the person responding to the fire to pull the fire alarm, which is the facility’s signal for an immediate building evacuation, the plan for which is referenced in the procedures.
This plan, already designed, specifies who is responsible for gathering needed supplies, what the procedures are for getting to the rally point, and so on.Next, the responder must evaluate the situation. Depending on the extent of the fire, he or she would either attempt to extinguish it using a portable fire extinguisher (step 3) or seal off the affected area to help prevent the fire’s spread to other parts of the facility (step 4). Make additional copies of the disaster response plan template (Appendix H) and begin drafting response plans for each one.



How to write a book title online loan
Can you become an author at 13
How much does it cost to write a will in ontario jobs


Comments to «Working through home on internet»

  1. Enigma_Flawers writes:
    Will work hard the issue to our personal i'm also eager to see the next workshop and.
  2. BOXER writes:
    And he considered himself as a failure and.
  3. TM_087 writes:
    Bad the news tells the most something.
  4. KETR writes:
    Know whether you did it or not life more difficulty or increase your don't usually read interviews, this.
  5. NightWolf writes:
    Article, you are at a considerable want anyone to forget thoughts that help you to flourish.