How you know if you can get pregnant 2014,decaf coffee and trying to get pregnant,husband advice pregnant wife missing - Try Out
The presidential elections are a long way off, and though some pundits are talking about the 2016 presidential contest, there is certainly a lull in news about the next race for the White House. Do you know that when you find time in your hectic schedule to stop by the local polling place to cast your vote for America’s chief that you aren’t actually voting for the candidate of your choice? Not only has technology rendered the Electoral College obsolete, its flaws have become more apparent as population has increased exponentially in certain states. To abolish the Electoral College would need a constitutional amendment, and could be stopped by states with as little as 3% of the U.S.
Instead, by state laws, without changing anything in the Constitution, The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
When the bill is enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes– enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538), all the electoral votes from the enacting states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC.
The presidential election system that we have today was not designed, anticipated, or favored by the Founding Fathers but, instead, is the product of decades of evolutionary change precipitated by the emergence of political parties and enactment by 48 states of winner-take-all laws, not mentioned, much less endorsed, in the Constitution.
The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). The bill has passed 32 state legislative chambers in 21 rural, small, medium, and large states with 243 electoral votes.
EVER SINCE MY FATHER EXPLAINED THE ELECTION PROCESS DURING THE JFK ELECTION I HAVEBEEN AGAINST THE ENTIRE FEDERAL ELECTION PROCESS FROM THE ELECTORAL VOTE WTO THE CAMPAIGN FUND RAISERS.
With chatter at a minimum for the near future, it seems like as good a time as any to talk about the Electoral College. They created a system of government that has withstood over two-hundred sometimes tumultuous years of drastic change and evolution.
States can, and frequently have, changed their method of awarding electoral votes over the years. The bill has been enacted by 10 jurisdictions with 136 electoral votes – 50.4% of the 270 necessary to go into effect. These Electors, through an American oddity known as the Electoral College, vote for the next president. However, changes have been made over the decades to correct a few of the flaws, and another change is long overdue. Our Founding Fathers felt that it was impractical and nearly impossible to hold an election in a vast country, collect the votes, and then transport them to the capital to be counted.
Wyoming has three electoral votes ( two senators and one member of the House of Representatives) and about 576,000 residents.
Using only the popular vote to determine the winner of our presidential elections will not only make more sense, it will make every American’s vote equal and important. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action. The Electors were educated and worldly men, who understood politics far better than the average farmer or hick from the sticks.
California has 55 electoral votes ( 2 senators and 53 members of the House of Representatives) and a population of 38 million.
HELL THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN THE UNITED STATES CAN BE DETERMINED BY THE VOTE IN AS FEW AS A HANDFUL OF STATES TOTALLING 270 ELECTORAL VOTES WHICH COULD IN FACT BE NO INDICATION OF A MAJORITY VOTE OF WE THE PEOPLE. However, it now causes more controversy and confusion than our Founding Fathers could have ever imagined. They were appointed by the states, and entrusted with the hopes and wishes of the average citizen, who neither had the time, the education, nor the inclination to comprehend the complexity of politics.
By dividing the population of each state by its electoral votes, we can determine that Wyoming has one electoral vote for every 192,000 citizens, while California has one electoral vote for approximately every 690,900 residents. It is time for the United States to abolish this remnant of our distant past and install an election process where every citizen’s vote counts the same.
YOU ARE LOOKING AT AMUSLIM HYPOCRITE WHOSE CONTRIBUTIONS BOUGHT THE OFFIC TWICE AND YOU THE PEOPLE LET IT HAPPEN.
Second hand maternity clothes cork|
Cant get pregnant with 4th child
Pregnancy week calculator webmd
Chances of getting pregnant without a condom and no ejaculation
Published at: when your pregnant