Testosterone cycle at 19,gym supplements 2014,protein supplement shop in lucknow,best pre workout mass supplement warehouse - PDF Books

10.04.2014, admin  
Category: Nutrition Plan

While all AAS drugs may be capable of improving muscle mass, strength, and performance, it would not be correct to say there are no advantages to choosing one agent over another for a particular purpose.
The potential for adverse reactions should also be considered when choosing a steroid to use, especially if AAS use is to be regularly repeated. There are additional considerations other than the cost effectiveness of a particular dosage.
The period immediately following steroid cession can involve a state of hypogonadism (low androgen levels), and as a result protein catabolism. When concluding a cycle, some steroid users also follow a practice of first slowly reducing their dosages (tapering). The reasons for stacking androgenic and anabolic steroids together in this manner during steroid cycles are two fold. Aside from early experimentation on athletes by a handful of sports physicians, an extensive effort to study the physique- and performance-enhancing properties of these drugs, specifically with an eye on developing strategies for using them to maximize benefits and minimize adverse effects, has not been undertaken by the medical community. This has been the result of many years of development, where specific patients and needs are addressed with drugs that have specific characteristics.
Most fundamentally, the quantity and quality of muscle gained may be different from one agent to another. Building muscle mass is the most common goal, and usually entails the use of one of the more androgenic substances such as testosterone, methandrostenolone, or oxymetholone. For example, the listed oral medications present greater strain on the cardiovascular system, and are also liver toxic. In an effort to minimize muscle loss, the objective here is usually on restoring natural testosterone production, maintaining an optimal level of muscle stimulation, and remaining dedicated to proper nutrition. This tapering may proceed for a 3-4 week period, and will involve an even stepping down of the dose each week until the point of drug discontinuance. On the one hand, high doses of testosterone, oxymetholone, or methandrostenolone are prone to producing strong androgenic and estrogenic side effects.
Because of this, illicit users have been left to develop their own protocols for administering these drugs.
For example, some drugs are considered milder (less androgenic), and produce fewer side effects in women and children.
In a general sense, AAS that are also estrogenic tend to be more effective at promoting increases in total muscle size. Those looking for lean mass often find favor in such anabolic staples as nandrolone decanoate, oxandrolone, or stanozolol. For these reasons, the injectable medications listed are actually preferred for safety (testosterone most of all). Below this (therapeutic), potential anabolic benefits are often counterbalanced, at least to some extent, by the suppression of endogenous testosterone.
In light of diminishing returns, the tradeoff between results and adverse reactions becomes less and less favorable. A hormonal recovery program is usually initiated, which may involve the use of HCG, tamoxifen, and clomiphene (see PCT: Post Cycle Therapy).

Stacking is most common with advanced bodybuilders who find that at a certain level of physical development they begin hitting plateaus that are difficult to break with a previous single-agent approach. Stacking first became very popular during the 1960s, a time when effective estrogen maintenance drugs were not widely available. The result has been a large variety of different approaches to using these agents, some safer or more effective than others. Others are more androgenic, which makes them better at supporting sexual functioning in men. These steroids also tend to produce visible water (and sometimes fat) retention, however, and are generally favored when raw size is more important than muscle definition.
At very high doses (excessive supratherapeutic), smaller incremental gains are noticed (diminishing returns). Gains made on lower doses also tend to be better retained after steroid discontinuance than those resulting from excessive intake. To continue making significant progress beyond this point can entail escalating dosages, which is likely to coincide with a greater incidence of adverse reactions and diminishing anabolic returns. This practice has never been evaluated in a clinical setting, and is not widely recommended with steroid medications as it is with some other drugs such as thyroid hormones or antidepressants. In many cases, however, it may simply be the greater cumulative steroid dosage that is necessary for the resumed progress.
An anabolic-androgen stack allowed the use of a higher total steroid dosage than would be tolerable with a single androgen. While it would not be possible to comprehensively evaluate all known approaches, this section will discuss some of the most fundamental and time-proven methods for using AAS. Drugs with low or no significant estrogenicity tend to produce less dramatic size gains in comparison, but the quality is higher, with greater visible muscularity and definition.
Methandrostenolone is the most common choice for mass building, and is almost universally regarded as highly effective and only moderately problematic (in terms of estrogenic or androgenic side effects). For example, men with a strong sensitivity to gynecomastia sometimes prefer non-estrogenic drugs such as methenolone, stanozolol, or oxandrolone. In the case of testosterone enanthate or cypionate, for example, a dosage of 100 mg per week is considered therapeutic, and is generally insufficient for noticing strong anabolic benefits. It is generally not realistic to expect that rapid double-digit weight gains induced by massive dosing will remain long after a cycle is over. Even without dosage escalation, negative health changes are already likely to be apparent, and should be corrected fairly quickly.
Some AAS abusers have difficulties with complete drug abstinence, and will initiate “bridging” routines between full-dose cycles. Virtually every high-dose AAS administration study can also be found to end at the maximum dosage, with no time allotted to tapering. Stacking usually involves the combination of a more androgenic steroid with one or more primarily anabolic agents. In reviewing the most popular AAS drugs, we can separate them into these two main categories as follows.

Stanozolol is the oral anabolic steroid most often preferred for improving lean mass or athletic performance. Individuals worried about hair loss, on the other hand, may isolate their use to predominantly anabolic drugs, such as nandrolone, methenolone, and oxandrolone.
When the dosage is in the 200-600 mg per week range, however, the drug is highly efficient at supporting muscle growth (moderate supratherapeutic). The practice of extended or continuous steroid administration is discouraged for these reasons. This may involve the periodic low-dose administration of an injectable steroid, such as 200 mg of testosterone enanthate or methenolone enanthate every 2-3 weeks.
One flaw in the logic of using a tapering program is that they are ostensibly designed to aid hormone recovery. On the anabolic side, common steroids of choice include boldenone, methenolone, nandrolone, oxandrolone, and stanozolol. All AAS drugs activate the same cellular receptor, and as such share similar protein anabolizing properties. A detailed review of personal goals, health status, and potential side effects of each drug is advised before committing to any AAS regimen. Above this range, a greater level of muscle gain may be noticed, but the amount will be small in comparison to the dosage increase. It is also very important to remember that higher doses aren’t always what are needed to achieve greater gains.
It is generally recommended to use AAS drugs for no longer than 8 weeks at a time (10-12 weeks at the maximum), followed by an equal or longer period of abstinence before another steroid regimen is initiated.
Such practice is discouraged, however, as it can interfere with hormonal recovery, and prevent a return to metabolic homeostasis.
Recovery is not possible, however, while supraphysiological levels of androgens are present, and such levels are usually found during all weeks of a normal (nonmedical) steroid taper. Testosterone, oxymetholone, or methandrostenolone will serves as the androgenic base of most stacks.
In other words, while different AAS drugs may have some differing properties, if your objective is to gain muscle mass and strength, this could be accomplished with virtually any one of the commercially available agents. An individual more focused on his or her training and diet will often make better gains on lower dosages of AAS than a less dedicated individual taking higher doses. Individuals remain cautioned that dosage tapering is not a proven way to reduce post- cycle muscle catabolism.

Post workout supplement for cutting
Mutant mass discount supplements uk
Bodyrock 500 workout

Comments to “Testosterone cycle at 19”

  1. KOLGA:
    Egg yolks are merchandise actually work before he brings them to his audience reason to continue.
  2. AYAN:
    Out available on the market certainly one extremely diligent.