Welcome to Equine herpes virus vaccine!

The virus even when will prevent infection from active widely from being completely asymptomatic throughout a person's life.

10.03.2015

Cures for cancer already exist, treatment for herpes simplex virus infection - PDF Review

Author: admin
Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but major pharmaceutical companies are not interested.
Researchers at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Canada have cured cancer last week, yet there is a little ripple in the news or in TV.
This drug doesn't require a patent, so anyone can employ it widely and cheaply compared to the costly cancer drugs produced by major pharmaceutical companies. Canadian scientists tested this dichloroacetate (DCA) on human's cells; it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells and left the healthy cells alone. In human bodies there is a natural cancer fighting human cell, the mitochondria, but they need to be triggered to be effective. With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.
This article wants to raise awareness for this study, hope some independent companies and small startup will pick up this idea and produce these drugs, because the big companies won't touch it for a long time. Solid tumors, including the aggressive primary brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme, develop resistance to cell death, in part as a result of a switch from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to cytoplasmic glycolysis.
Bravo Sott, but what a shame for media industry, big pharma and science to put this kind of research under the carpet!!!! I don't have the appropriate background to elaborate further, but the Wikipedia article is well developed, for starters. I am very glad to hear that you are pursuing new pathways to a cure but sad that you don't control the purse strings that determine which pathway gets the most attention. There was a point when we had a health forum to share info about what we did to reverse our diagnosis. After just taking a molecular pathogenesis of cancer class this past semester, it makes me sad to say the writers of this paper do not know much about the function of the apoptotic pathway in cancer cells. I don't know why most scientists seem to LOVE things to be 'set in stone' but for whatever reason the modern world of factory-manufactured scientific pursuit seems to attract people who love to conform, and almost just plug re-arrange like early telephone switchboard operators or early computers punching 1's and 0's, and to most of them, frankly it's just another job alongside engineering or programming and everything's black and white and stable and oh-so-left-brain friendly, now. I wouldn't call DCA a cancer cure, but it's been around for a long time and it certainly can help in a lot of cases. There are many more mitochondria in a cancerous cell (about 20 times), on account of its huge need for sugar (since it's not burning it with oxygen as normal, but fermenting it which is very inefficient). For anyone that's reading this hoping for a cure for a cancer condition for them or someone they care about now, explore DCA for sure, but also explore Cesium Chloride, Budwig diet (please don't dismiss that one just because it's a 'diet', it's extremely effective), Gerson, Oleander, herb robert etc. There are many weaknesses in a cancer cell, and it's not insurmountable the way popular medicine would have us believe. I've already posted several comments basically the same to attract more attention to the real root of the issue here. What you mean is cancer cells make their energy by glycolysis instead of making it in the mitochondria.
However, in the labs of these companies, we find dedicated and passionate scientists and medical professionals who are committed to finding cures and helping people live healthier lives. Pharma companies are not organizations that exist in their own little bubbles, and they very rarely work alone. What happened in Egypt is classic - through our networks, we can bypass the scarcity mentality of corporations and politics, and cooperate and converge in support of a system that works for 100% of humanity.
Presently, 193 approved cancer drugs are on the market.1 Few, however, have been tested in combination. If oncologists were to unleash against cancer every possible combination of drugs that already have been approved, then as shown below 57 million unique cancer treatments already exist. Studies now demonstrate that rarely is cancer triggered by a single genetic mutation, but by multiple genes mutations and interactions3. The war on cancer has become a multi-front battle involving oncologists, scientists, and patients.


Investment OpportunityGo to ARK's fund website for more information on our theme-based Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). I've heard a theory that given the widespread incidence of cancer, a cancer cure probably already exists but has been hidden by major pharmaceutical companies to maximise revenue from expensive cancer treatment, since a cure would be one-off but treatment is life-long.
The general story is that there is a conspiracy by the established medical industry to keep the cure for cancer hidden. Individual motivation: people don't get into cancer research to get rich, but because they want to cure cancer, and for the prestige ("Among the factors that motivate researchers, the excitement of discovery stood out in terms of both high importance and satisfaction. Profit: Just look at the current Sovaldi story where a cure for Hepatitis C was released - disease that is even more expensive to treat ($60,000 to $100,000 lifetime cost) than breast cancer ($23,000 to $36,000 lifetime cost).
Cancer doesn't work like that: A singular "cure for cancer" will almost certainly never exist.
The fact that those headline exist don't make it easy to understand why we still haven't solved cancer.
1) Some of those headline actually lead to drugs that do help to cure some patients of cancer. But I believe, Dr.Rife has indeed demonstrated a simple cure for Cancer and published it too. Scientists used to think that these mitochondria cells were damaged and thus ineffective against cancer. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. I would like to point out that I am not a regular reader of this website (which upon further inspection seems to be full of highly erroneous information about cancer research).
What we found was that there is a relentless and dedicated network of people who sniff out any public claim or discussion on the internet (no matter how small) of alternate treatment to cancer. Some people have found successful ways and are willing to help others and won't ask for a fee or donation.
It isn't about saving a life, its about a paycheck for them, fattening they're bank account. Indeed because of recent success with combination therapy, the research focus is beginning to shift away from the tissues to the genes implicated in each case of cancer.
If cancer cases could be classified by the combination of genes mutating, then each case could be treated by a cocktail of drugs targeting the genes implicated.
Mainstream media frequently runs headlines that make it seem like the cancer cure is found.
Just in this year the FDA allowed five cancer drugs to enter the market because they believe that those drugs do provide clinical benefits to some patients. 6 more months to live are not something to scoff at, and it could also be useful in preparation for or combination with other therapies.
A group of 128 (About that number) of Terminally ill cancer patients were cured by this doctor and the California doctor's association gave two celebration dinners to acknowledge this very important - but very in-expensive, safe and nil side effects treatment , way back in the 1920s. So they used to focus on glycolysis, which is less effective in curing cancer and more wasteful. All the groundwork can be done in collaboration with the Universities, who will be glad to assist in such research and can develop an effective drug for curing cancer.
We tested whether the small-molecule and orphan drug dichloroacetate (DCA) can reverse this cancer-specific metabolic and mitochondrial remodeling in glioblastoma. We need to start questioning our Doctors more and asking for alternatives that is the ONLY way we will bring Big Pharma to a realisation - they can't dictate to us.
The original manuscript referenced describes tissue based work and a one arm non randomized administration of DCA to 5 people with a rare type of treatment resistant brain cancer.
It is clear that the medical authorities already know the cure (which they don't use or even tell you about) and they know that other people have figured it out.


But I am sure if someone uses the method to cure their cancer they will be willing to give the person something in return. However, a cancer cell, being a cancer cell, will have this pathway cut off--irreversibly--simply because it otherwise it would have been killed before it became cancer. So then, ALL you've learnt, is existing information observed BEFORE the study here published by Bonnet et al. It is other, real, parts of the mitochondrial cytochrome C pathway that are messed up in cancer. But again, if a scientist working at one of Pfizer's Centers for Therapeutic Innovation completed clinical trials on a compound that actually cured cancer there is nothing that would stop them from delivering it to the market.
Next generation sequencing cancer diagnostics, such as those now offered by Foundation Medicine FMI and soon Illumina ILMN and Cepheid CPHD, will direct oncologists to personalized combination therapies for their patients.
Targeting multiple genes with multiple drugs, those fighting cancer can look to customized therapies for new hope.
No part of ARK’s original content may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of ARK Investment Management LLC. Whoever found this cure would earn the gratitude and admiration of millions, achieve the biggest thing that is possible to achieve in the field they chose to dedicate their life to, and win a Nobel prize with absolute certainty (the American Cancer Society lists 47 nobel laureates they have supported). You could price this cure at $10,000 or more and still have millions of customers, so tens of billions of profits! If a drug manages to kill 99% of the cancer cells in a patient and the remaining 1% is immune to the drug because it has a genetic mutation the cancer grows back.
There is absolutely no data to support efficacy (is is simply a safety study) and certainly no evidence that this treatment is a "cure for cancer", just that it worked well in petri dishes and it didn't appear to make five people sicker than they already were (but there was no control group for comparison). There's so much money involved in the horrific fraud that is modern cancer treatment that these psychopathic people think they can do whatever they want.
Its all about the money for them, everything is, and the thing is, the people here are getting more and more lazier and stupid, they just believe whatever they tell them. Even if Merck, Eli Lilly, BMS, and Johnson & Johnson all released clones of the same compound, they would still make a fortune. And it would even be a steady stream of revenue, as people would continue to get cancer - unless it's some sort of vaccination, in which case, even better, every person on the planet is your customer!
Each type of cancer is biologically different from the other, and each causes a whole set of different problems, which must be treated in different ways." In fact, even one tumor of a single patient often consists of multiple strains of cancerous cells that respond differently to treatments!
That means that the ability of a drug to kill a bunch of cancer cells simply isn't enough to cure cancer. This DCA on the other hand doesn't rely on glycolysis instead on mitochondria; it triggers the mitochondria which in turn fights the cancer cells. In a separate experiment with five patients who had glioblastoma, we prospectively secured baseline and serial tumor tissue, developed patient-specific cell lines of glioblastoma and putative glioblastoma stem cells (CD133+, nestin+ cells), and treated each patient with oral DCA for up to 15 months. Pretty much the only treatments that work for many different cancers are the extremely crude ones: surgery (cut it out!) and radiotherapy (burn it with death rays!), both of which are also only efficient in specific circumstances (contained, solid tumors). This means that pharma companies don't invest in some prospective drugs that are able to shrink the size of the cancer because shrinking the size of a cancer simply isn't enough. We just have to be brave and know that that toxic medicines being forced on us as cures aren't our answer.
Their message is that I am a dangerous paranoid delusional kook for everything I just said in this comment and that you are too if you believe me.



Integrative medical doctors in new jersey
Natural cure for diabetes
Seattle naturopathic doctors
Treatment for stds in women


Comments to “Cures for cancer already exist”

  1. SENYOR:
    Overlook that these are realistic.
  2. xanim_qiz:
    Sores before they surface sensations.