Toxic personality,tibetan buddhist meditation practice,spirit rock meditation center - Plans On 2016

admin | to meditate in silence | 20.07.2014
Marcy Twete is a career fundraiser turned corporate responsibility executive, a career and networking expert and the author of the book "You Know Everybody! I was personally not surprised at how consistently I used my products because I have used the same products for years now because of the sensitive nature of my skin and body to new products. All in all my product placed lower on the risk scale for the known carcinogens within the scrub. The titanium dioxide has been found to be a carcinogen through several studies with the use of lab rats between 1985 and 2004. Since it seems plausible that my “popular brand” products are made up of some toxic ingredients, I decided to investigate the toxicity of my make-up remover, Neutrogena Oil-Free Eye Make Up Remover. Benzalkonium Chloride is another sneaky ingredient that is ranked relatively high on the hazard scale, with a rating of 6 out of 10.
After reading about these different toxins, the only solace I had was the fact that there was only marginal evidence of these ingredients leading to toxicity; even though they can cause cancer and affect your immune system and organs, these would be extreme long term effects after persistent and continuous exposure. In terms of workplace safety, the company goes through great lengths to reduce occupational hazards that range from exposure to toxic ingredients and exposure to factors such as factory noise, heat stress, and radiation.
Looking at my Body Works chart I think that it is pretty typical for a college student, if not a bit lacking compared to what I would imagine most college girls charts would look like.
Some alternatives that I see to the injustices and toxic casualties of the above system would be a complete inspection by the FDA which would include new regulations for health, safety, and environmental protection as well as mandating improved working conditions for their workers. During our three-day observation period, I used Nature’s Gate Pomegranate Sunflower Velvet Moisture Body Wash only once. The Nature’s Gate website provides interesting information about the production of their product, whose “Certified Organic botanicals are farmed without the use of synthetic or inorganic chemicals, utilizing methods that naturally enhance soil structure, conserve water and mitigate climate change. I used Cosmetics Database (CD) to find information about the toxicological impact of using this particular body wash over the long term. CD also recorded a possibility of occupational hazards in relation to handling the sodium hydroxide in this product. The majority of ingredients aside from the fragrance listed a four or lower on the Cosmetics Database scale, meaning their toxic impact is smaller. The Nature’s Gate website displays for the consumer ways to care for the earth’s resources. The better question is how do the cosmetics industry and the government allow such contamination to happen? I would say that the solution to banning toxins from cosmetics lies in regulation, but obviously this does not seem to be working.
When we do for those in need what they have the capacity to do for themselves, we disempower them.
For all our efforts to eliminate poverty—our entitlements, our programs, our charities—we have succeeded only in creating a permanent underclass, dismantling their family structures, and eroding their ethic of work. Giving to those in need what they could be gaining from their own initiative may well be the kindest way to destroy people.
We respond with immediacy to desperate circumstances but often are unable to shift from crisis relief to the more complex work of long-term development.  When relief does not transition to development in a timely way, compassion becomes toxic. Most work done by volunteers could be better done by locals in less time and with better results. As a country, we understand that welfare creates unhealthy dependency, that it erodes the work ethic, that it cannot elevate people out of poverty. Again and again we are finding that when it comes to global needs in organizational development and human development, the granting of money creates dependence and conflict, not independence and respect.
Wherever there was sustained one-way giving, unwholesome dynamics and pathologies festered under the cover of kindheartedness. The challenge for those of us in service work is to redirect traditional methods of charity into systems of genuine exchange. Mercy without justice degenerates into dependency and entitlement, preserving the power of the giver over the recipient. When a church makes decisions about serving others, are the ones being served the urban poor or the church?
Someone needs to raise the question, Is the church enabling missionaries to minister, or are the missionaries serving the needs of the church? Are recipients assuming greater levels of control over their own lives or do they show up, year after year, with their hands out? Why do you think it is important for the church to evaluate its charitable giving programs?
OK–I agree we should be teaching folks to fish not just giving them a fish, but don’t you think his view is just a tad myopic?
I also agree with you that there are many times when a simple act of charity is called for.
TNS Employee Insights' blogs are stories, opinions and reports about the workplace regarding engagement, retention, brand, and other HR issues and challenges.
FEBRUARY 18, 2015 – Mike Schroeder, CEO of TNS Employee Insights, is in Utah this week, not only to enjoy the scenery, but he was invited by Qualtrics to speak there again this year. Mike will discuss how to move from insights to actionable improvements in employee engagement. See Qualtric’s Facebook page for more details and see where we are listed on their website!
As human beings, we know we are creatures of habit, and as they also say, “Old habits die hard.” It’s true.
Toxicity can happen anywhere at any given workplace no matter how small or large, or what industry. During a college course on leadership in the workplace, one of our assignments was to interview a prominent leader of any organization. For the first few years of being fresh in the workforce, you are gathering all kinds of experience. With so many careers to choose from how do you select just the right one that will drive you to be successful and fulfilled?
When you think about conducting an employee survey, consider the benefits of it being one of the best and most significant communication tools you can use at your company. The first message should be that the organization’s leadership is genuinely interested in what employees have to say. Each question on a survey should be examined thoughtfully to ensure they are consistent with the company goals.
Show where there are areas of strengths and weaknesses and communicate to employees how the company intends to change them.
Employees should be able to share their thoughts without retribution when they voice their opinions – whether on an employee survey or in person. Some employees think that online surveys are much less anonymous than paper, because they think their IP addresses will link survey responses to individuals. Due to Jane’s boss not being able to extend her more working hours as a part-timer, she asked her boss if she could arrange her schedule should she be called to work at another occasional part time job – given enough notice.
I don’t ever want to be that person who is always “sucking up” to the boss, and yet, there are some who might misinterpret a good working relationship between a boss and a subordinate.
An employee who is truly engaged, does great work and is recognized with a pat on the back by their boss, deserves accolades – not favors. I believe that the notion of someone being “overly” engaged is only in the mind of the observer. It’s probably happened to all of us at one time or another, when we have a manager that just doesn’t like us for some reason. After just writing about a jealous boss, maybe there’s a social case where it’s not jealousy but a genuine personality clash.
When someone is trying to hide the fact that you’re interviewing for what could be a toxic work environment, they might use specific language. But you’ll thank yourself in the long run for seeing them and running in the other direction!
This was partially because of the neutrality of the salicylic acids and the oxides and their chemistry within the product. Citric acid was found to be helpful, but in the mid 1930’s Germany was motivated to develop its own chelating material and not be dependent on importing citric acid. During the last couple days I have tracked my body work, the products that I apply to my body to meet a health, hygiene or beauty need. Keeping my fingers crossed, I began to do research on this product, hoping that at least my make-up remover, which I trust every night to fully remove my make-up off my face, was not toxic. According to the Cosmetics’ Database, my Neutrogena eye make-up remover is considered to be a “moderate hazard” to my body…just great.  Listed under the products highest health concerns are “neurotoxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation, and irritation of the skin, eyes and lungs;” talk about a scary list! Although it is not related to neurotoxicity or organ system toxicity, there is very strong evidence of allergies and immunotoxicity.
However, shouldn’t Neutrogena try to find alternatives for these ingredients instead of distributing them in their products? They have special toxicology teams that are responsible for setting “acceptable” exposure standards for different chemicals that meet the limitations given by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. I don’t hate make-up, I did stage make-up in high school, it is just that I have always thought that wearing less is better for most occasions, especially for just going to school everyday. One crappy tube of mascara, that I’ve had forever, is more toxic for me than almost anything else I use in a day. I have made an effort to reduce any harmful products (like Herbal Essences shampoo) and buy ones that have fewer ingredients or are homemade. I bought this product in Whole Foods, thinking that as long as I bought the product at such a store, it must be somewhat earth and body friendly.


Nature’s Gate sources Organic ingredients from Bayliss Ranch, a nearby organic farm in Biggs, California, minimizing the distance for transportation and the associated energy usage and emissions. I found this quite ironic as the product’s website claims to be “animal cruelty free.” But what about the human animals who manufacture and use this product!
The ranking for human health impacts is pretty good, but the “Company” rating is not as good as the Nature’s Gate website might lead one to believe.
For me personally, I would argue that the level of personal risk is small, considering my exposure to this product is minimal. In the video “Story of Stuff” by the Story of Stuff Project, it is explained just how harmful some cosmetics can be. Unfortunately, not all products, ingredients, and chemicals used in cosmetic products are FDA approved or put on product labels. Our free food and clothing distribution encourages ever-growing handout lines, diminishing the dignity of the poor while increasing their dependency.
Because,as compassionate people, we have been evaluating our charity by the rewards we receive through service, rather than the benefits received by the served. Add to it the combination of patronizing pity and unintended superiority, and charity becomes toxic. Justice without mercy is cold and impersonal, more concerned about rights than relationships. The posts are the views and opinions of TNS employees and their guests and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of TNS or its affiliates. How do you coach your managers about what they need to do with employee engagement survey results? Where there is human interaction, there is potential for disappointment that can add up to unhappy employees.
Not only are you acquiring actual work experience while garnering a paycheck, you’re learning how to organize your time and how to deal with coworkers and clients. So, I tried to achieve that goal but for some reason, while my work was good, the opportunity never presented itself to me for a variety of reasons, and so I settled for lower wages as just another staff artist.
Pre-survey communications; advertising that the survey is coming, should relay survey goals, anonymity and post-survey findings. They must be assured by management that the data and feedback collected will never be singled out or individuals identified. The boss told Jane that if that opportunity landed on a day she was scheduled to work, she should just call in sick that day. I don’t think you should ever have to make excuses or explain to anyone why you have that good working relationship unless it’s just to say that you have good karma, while still being very much engaged.
In fact, in many cases it can mean the opposite because a person’s motives for buddying up to their boss could mean they want a promotion, more money, or special favors. Anyone witnessing the pat on the back may just be envious, while at the same time, happy for that person who deserves the merit. And though their advice was spot on, I thought to myself, “who cares about identifying a toxic work environment when you’re in one! Sure, they want to double check to ensure they’re making the right decisions, but decision making is permitted at levels below the C-suite.
Coworkers and leaders who like each other and work in a productive and fun environment tend to spend time together over lunch, for happy hour, and outside of work. As you can probably imagine, the process of tracking everything that you use in one day on your own body and the specific time when you used it was incredibly frustrating. Although the database states that most of these concerns reach only a moderate level, it is clear that there are several ingredients in this product that after a long time of exposure can have very hazardous effects on my face and the rest of my body; among the most harmful are Benzyl Alcohol, Benzalkonium Chloride, and Cyclopentasiloxane.
It has been found to be such a powerful immune, skin, and respiratory irritant that Japan has restricted its use in cosmetics and Canada has not only restricted its use but also prohibited it in their cosmetics. What were their particular standards for evaluating toxins and were they meeting these standards in all their products? That being said, the one cosmetic product that I use everyday without fail is Lash Blast Fusion mascara by CoverGirl. This product ranked a 7 out 10 on the toxic scale and CoverGirl itself hasn’t even allowed safety personal to inspect it for any kind of improvement since 1999, leaving most of the data on this product limited.
They would also need to sign agreements maintaining these changes as well as ending animal testing and as well as the use of toxic chemicals in their products.
Nicole Blades wrote “What Shouldn’t Go near Your Va-Jay-Jay.” The article lists products that are harmful to vaginal health.
However, I was still surprised by how many products I use, even if they are “natural.” Most definitely, the number of products I use, the hygienic ones aside (arguably), is a reflection on my class status and location in the Western world.
The farm’s water supply is derived from rain and runoff of the adjacent Sierra Nevada snow pack.” It seems as though this company understands the importance of protecting soil and water and conserving resources. Based on these ratings and the product website, I would suggest that this company is using some environmentally healthy practices but still has places in which to improve. Unfortunately, although the corporation lists various ways in which it is concerned about the environment (using recycled and recyclable materials, conserving resources, utilizing local sources), Nature’s Gate still seems to be more concerned with using “natural botanicals” to sell a product. The cosmetics industry is extremely flawed in its production, marketing, and manufacturing techniques.
The more I educate myself, friends, family, and the public about the harm in using such toxic products, the easier it will be to stop industry from poisoning its consumers. We have failed to adequately calculate the effects of our service on the lives of those reduced to objects of our pity and patronage. However, even our best efforts will always be partial and provisional in their effectiveness. Also, I haven’t read his book, but he seems oblivious to the greatest economic meltdown in over 80 years. Boy, I feel as though I’m having a deja vu as I write this, but we may say we are all for progress, but we are doing things that insinuate otherwise.
Unhappy employees tend to want to spread their misery to others, even if unknowingly doing so.
I tried to get in touch with him, but to my disappointment (and his) he would be in Europe on vacation for several weeks.
What they do need is the experience of being a good leader in which their reputation attests time and again that they are worthy of recognition and greatness.
Meanwhile, you’ll be judged, sized-up, and oftentimes criticized (gently or harshly), not only by your manager, but by your coworkers as well.
If employees do not trust the organization, they may not answer survey questions honestly if they fear retribution. TNS ensures that privacy and anonymity is lock-tight when using our online survey technology. Jane took offense to the advice of lying and calling in sick because she has a good work ethic.
Anyone who believes that any of their coworkers are overly engaged is perhaps mistaking them for being enthusiastic or passionate about their work.
You try your best to figure it out with coworkers and friends, and still you get a weird vibe.
But underneath it all, there is a reason and you have to do some brainstorming to get to the bottom of it.
However, halfway throughout this process I realized that the source of my frustration was just how often and how many products were included in my own body work.  As I look through my finished list, I can honestly say that I am decently happy with it and that I am not very surprised. According to the Database, Benzyl Alcohol is a naturally occurring and synthetic ingredient that is frequently used as a solvent and a preservative, although it has several other uses that do not really pertain to my eye make-up remover. Furthermore, if any chemicals exceed the set standards within the workplace, employees are given the appropriate tools to ensure they are protected. Therefore I wasn’t very surprised by what I found recorded in this chart, in fact I could have probably predicted most of it beforehand.
Due to my consistent use of this product I chose it to be my researched project for this report.
In our toxicology study, I really want to discover the “risk” of using “natural” products, if there is any at all.
The packaging focuses on the natural botanicals included in the product while also outlining the different ingredients not included in the body wash, such as paraben and sulfate. What is frightening is that this company did not full label the fragrance used in the product. The industry makes products out to seem amazing – almost as if some products work miracles: “this product will make you look ten years younger”, “this product will last all day long”. Over half the population is below the poverty line–does he really think charity enslaves people in poverty irrespective of the current state of our economy?
Therefore, I chose to interview David Herda, superintendent of the Northern Illinois Gas Company.
Not only did Jane’s immediate boss tell her to call in sick but so did the store manager who has years of experience with this particular food chain. You could be two polar opposites whereby you’re not liked for you’re A-type, bombastic personality, while your manager is B-type, quiet and reserved. I once went through an interview process where 9 of the 11 people I interviewed with had been at the company less than 2 years.
Before beginning the process, I was aware that the majority of my body work log was going to consist of my make-up products that I use on a daily basis, which many people may consider “unnecessary.” At first, I was self-conscious for the implications that these products have – I expected people to look at my log and conclude that I was a woman that plastered her face with make-up to cover up some insecurity. Unfortunately, this ingredient has shown strong evidence of human neurotoxicity, is expected to be harmful or toxic to organs in human bodies in Canada, and has shown possible allergic effects in human studies…if that list doesn’t make a girl scared I don’t know what does. Beginning from 1993, Johnson & Johnson has set environmental goals to reduce toxic emissions and reduce their impacts on the surrounding communities.


This chart simply shows that everyday I wake up, put my contacts in and a little mascara on, at the end of the day I take a shower, brush my teeth, and take my contacts out, a rather simple daily routine. As well as a moderate concern for organ system toxicity due to sodium laureth sulfate and propylene glycol; along with low concern for ecotoxicology in trace amounts of chemicals.
We need to make it clear to Procter and Gamble, and to all other companies like it, that we will not stand for them to deviate from these new mandates; to let them know that if they do we will just stop buying. I think it’s awesome that Cosmo is taking steps toward increasing women’s awareness of toxic products. At this moment in my life, I feel really good about the beauty products I am using on my body, especially the ones that are homemade. The issue with discerning the toxicity of the fragrance is that this ingredient is not fully labeled. Here it would be most useful if there were stricter laws on labeling, so that consumers can know exactly what is in the product, even if it is unpronounceable or recognizable to the eye of a non-scientist. Their concern is selling Velvet Moisture Pomegranate Sunflower Body Wash to the uninformed consumer. It is not until recently that I have started thinking about the other affects that these products have.
Sure, by using this shampoo I will have super shiny, luscious, bouncy locks, but what else will I have…cancer, asthma, and reproductive problems? Envying someone for doing a good job with recognition should only inspire others to achieve success at work. Huge red flag, and while I didn’t see it at the time, I did after I was in the toxic environment.
Although some people may consider using nine make-up products every day to be excessive, I know I genuinely enjoy the process of putting on make-up, regardless of the beauty need that it may be fulfilling. Due to the evidence of all these hazardous consequences, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Assessments have recommended the use of this ingredient to be restricted in products, although they somehow determined it to be safe for use in cosmetics under the limitations.
We must stop buying toxic products, standing by as our wells are polluted, and allowing whole communities to be exploited. The health warnings give reasoning behind why such products shouldn’t be used and the chemistry to help women understand. Are these at all less toxic or unhealthy than chemistry-lab-designed, factory-produced products?
Of course, using products whose ingredients are readable and understandable is recommended over a manufactured product.
The website also focuses on the importance of caring for one’s body, while emphasizing the importance of sustainability. It has been proved that many cosmetic products including shampoo, sunscreen, and lipstick contain harmful carcinogens and other toxins. Known harmful chemicals such as Mercury, Dioxane, Nitrosamines, and other carcinogens are permitted for use in cosmetics, even though exposure to these chemicals is extremely toxic to humans. Who is getting more entitlements–the very rich or the very poor and is this fact interrelated? They have the “me syndrome.” It may seem like they are engaged, but their motives are very deceptive.
However, now that I can see exactly how many cosmetics I use and how often I use them, I plan on making an effort to reduce the amounts I apply on my body.
If these two ingredients don’t scare you enough already, we also have good old Cyclopentasiloxane, a silicon-based cyclic compound used as a skin conditioning agent.
Therefore, although these statements may not truly reflect their day-to-day follow-up on the health of their workers and their communities, the company does seem to take these issues very seriously and are proud of their improvements. Though the degree to how much better or worse off I am compared on other women would vary elsewhere.
Through limited data it would appear that the longer you are exposed to it, and the more often, the higher your level of risk, meaning that since I have used it roughly everyday for 2 years I’m at a very high risk for the above issues. For example, scented things alter the pH balance “down there” which leads to growth of bad bacteria. What would our society and our earth look like if we understood that really caring for ourselves meant refusing to manufacture or consume toxic products?
With this information available to the general public, why do I continue using such harmful products? Not only these chemicals alone, but combinations of such toxins can be lethal and are in no way tested, known, or regulated.
Yet, there are many of us who unknowingly insinuate this all the time, whether it’s part of one’s personality, or the outlook by top administrators of a company. Reflecting back on this need for my products that I use the most, I have found that this sick addiction to our products have gotten in the way of what we most need for our survival, and not what society has placed upon us to think is necessary for acceptance.
I expect that there are a good 30-40% of college women my age that use around the same amount of make-up product that I use, but I believe it varies significantly according to class and income, than any other societal measures. If this ingredient is moderately toxic in so many ways, why are companies like Neutrogena including it in their products? Even though this ingredient is ranked lower in the hazard scale, it sounds to me like one of the most potentially dangerous ingredients in my eye-make-up remover. It is possible that my product was created in any of these countries as it is sold worldwide, but it is most probable that it was manufactured here in the United States. As I stated, I am better off then a lot of college kids in America or Europe but I am also probably worse off, cosmetic-toxicity-wise, then women my age in say rural Africa. None of which are issues that I would ever want to have to deal with, so needless to say I was quite unhappy to find this all out, sitting in a computer lab in the basement of Old West, facing my tiny assailant as it lay nonchalantly on the desk beside me. Procter and Gamble was once a great company, we can return it to its former position as a humane and environmentally friendly company.
I know countless women that read Cosmopolitan, so I am happy to see that promoting good health through banning use of toxic products is becoming more well-known.
If sustainability meant more than recycling or conserving, but also sustaining lives, whether they are of the consumer or producer?
In most cases, it is the combinations of such harmful substances that lead to the worst toxic exposure. Cyclopentasiloxane is not only a potential neurotoxin, but it is also an endocrine disruptor and is likely an environmental toxin that is known to be persistent and bioaccumulate. Nonetheless, by looking at this impressive list of nations, it is evident that Johnson & Johnson not only reaches a huge public through their products but also has direct effects on its thousands of employees as well on the communities that house their facilities. Does Johnson & Johnson follow-up with its brands like Neutrogena and ensure that they are abiding by their toxicological and health standards? In American society today, the value of cosmetic beauty is stressed a lot more then in other countries, or even America before the 20’s.
So sign petitions pressuring the company to improve, buy healthy and natural products, and protest openly the injustices you witness around you brought on by these companies.
And even if I refuse to use mass-produced beauty products, can I reject the expectations of culture and ‘neglect’ my ‘beauty’ maintenance? In result, women in higher classes may have the ability to use more natural and less toxic make-up products on their bodies than I can. The latter characteristics have raised a lot of concern as they are regarded as indicators of truly dangerous toxins, as they will endure throughout time and increase in amounts through levels of the food chain. Recognizing this fact, the company has supposedly gone through great lengths to address the health of its employees by researching the toxicity and other harmful components of the ingredients they use in their products, as well as to create standards for the use of those ingredients and other measures that reduce the occupational hazards for their workforce. Hopefully they do, but whether that is the case or not, I believe we can all agree that it might be time for me to find a new make-up remover. As I thoroughly examine and evaluate the products I use daily, it becomes terrifying to confront myself with how poorly I have been treating my own body. Since I use “lesser quality products” or “popular consumer brands,” it is also possible that I am exposed to more toxins and am therefore in a higher level of risk. If this wasn’t terrifying enough, this ingredient is also thought to be a “mild” carcinogen, as one or more animal studies have shown formations of tumors in moderate doses. On their website under Ingredient Safety, it states, “Our companies are expected to comply with regulations on ingredients in all countries where our products are sold. This isn’t to say that everyone follows this socialization, some rural southern churches ban the wearing of make up and certain cultural movements such as the Free Love Movement preferred a more natural stance, but for the most part this idealized beauty achieved through make-up still rings true and usually at the expense of the environment (such as pollution due to factories or species endangerment due to harvesting for their scales). None of these differences could be considered necessary on an individual level, as it would be defined by a doctor or by the FDA, yet they couldn’t be considered completely avoidable culturally either based on how heavy a role make-up plays in certain societies today.
They are also criticized for polluting local rivers (killing fish populations and polluting the wells) as well as for extensive and often unnecessary animal testing. In other words, I can technically get cancer by using this product…who wouldn’t expect that in their cosmetics, right? Wherever authorities have set limits on certain ingredients, we require that our product formulations are within those limits. I am very much at risk by using this product, as it would be defined by a doctor or by the FDA, since it ranks so highly on the toxic scale and the company refused to sign the Compact for Safe Cosmetics, as are the communities that reside around factories due to their pollution and poor conditions for those workers living in the area.
We also work with regulatory authorities around the world to ensure our ingredients are safe for patients and consumers as well as the environment.” However if this statement is true, why is Neutrogena, a brand under Johnson & Johnson, allowed to use such toxic ingredients in their products? My product has also never been certified by EWG or an animal rights organization as a company that doesn’t practice on animals, leading to a high possibility that this is indeed how they test out their products. Through its prominent name and extensive past, Procter and Gamble, through CoverGirl, has hid a long history of polluting communities, abusing workers, intoxicating customers, and harming animals in its pursuit of manufacturing products such as the one that I own. By buying these products we are silently condoning the destruction of these systems that we depend on.



Positive thinking healing process
Meditate in chicago
Quotes for confidence in hindi
Good workouts at the gym for abs


Comments »

  1. GULESCI_KAYIFDA — 20.07.2014 at 14:34:55 Including both the (Toll-free) or International: 1-520-233-7010 grow.
  2. EFIR_BOY — 20.07.2014 at 10:52:46 Been shown to dramatically lower the probability of developing melancholy.
  3. azercay_dogma_cay — 20.07.2014 at 13:48:43 With a religious director from the many children, when saved.