At the conclusion of the four month trial, researchers found that the two carbohydrate restricted conditions led to greater weight loss and fat loss (both groups lost an average of ~9 lbs vs.
Now to be fair, this is just the summary report from a conference presentation so I can’t exactly go through the methodology to see what kind of diets the two low-carb groups were following the other 5 days of the week.
Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the participants in those two intermittent low carbohydrate groups actually ate fairly low carb for more than just those two days a week. But in any case, the important thing to note here is once again, we see evidence of superior body composition results as well as health outcomes when you consciously reduce (*note I did not say eliminate) the amount of carbohydrate you consume in your diet. Incorporating a few deliberate low-carbohydrate days into your regular routine can also be a fantastic way to avoid gaining a whack load of weight through the Holiday season, which is fast approaching.
May 2011 – Reduced carbohydrate intake to less than 50 grams per day and reduced protein intake to approximately 120 grams per day, entering a state of nutritional ketosis.
The most externally obvious change that occurred as I ratcheted down my carbohydrate intake was a decrease in body fat. Pay more attention to fat mass, separately, than overall body weight, and do the same with lean mass.


Most people, especially physically active people, probably experience some seasonal variation in body fat, especially at low levels. 5 lbs in the Mediterranean condition), as well as yielding superior benefits in decreasing the prevalence of insulin resistance (22% reduction in the low carb calorie-restricted, 14% reduction for the ad lib group and 4% reduction in the Mediterranean group). In fact, we can take the whole periodic, deliberate low intake philosophy one step further for really explosive results… but that’s a blog article for next week!
My body fat probably fluctuations between 7 and 10% over the course of year now, often a function of activity type (more than activity level). My goal was to reduce my waist to 32 inches and I calculated I would need to lose 20 pounds of fat, without losing any muscle mass, to do this. As silly as this sounds, I recall, back in the spring of 2009 while stuck in an airport, using calculus to integrate the volume of fat I needed to lose from my waist (both visceral – around my organs – and under my skin) to get down to a 32-inch waist. Total body weight is shown on top of each bar, while the blue bar represents lean tissue and the red bar represents fat. Back when I was in high school we relied on a combination of calipers (in the hands of an experienced user) and something called hydrostatic testing, where you are weighed in and out of water to calculate your percentage of body fat.


It’s actually an easy problem if you can remember how to integrate the volume of an oval “cylinder” and you know the density of fat. Hence, in September 2009, I weighed 195 pounds, of which 156 was lean, 39 was fat, and my body fat (the number below) was 20%. Doing in the “wrong” way can result in equal loss of fat and lean mass (or, worse yet, disproportionate loss of lean mass).
Without any loss of lean tissue, I had reduced fat mass to 13 pounds and body fat to under 8%.



Supplements to gain muscle and strength
Build muscle and lose fat diet


Comments to “High protein low fat low carb foods”

  1. ILQAR_909  writes:
    And all the 143 video teaching classes are.
  2. WARLOCK  writes:
    Was posted to eat since 1980: Systematic analysis of well being examination surveys each and lately.