Orthodox treatment for type 1 diabetes life,glaucoom magnesium,blood glucose testing for type 2 diabetes yahoo,free diabetic soup recipes 5.4 - Test Out


The OHRC reviewed all applications (formerly known as “complaints”) filed with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) citing creed as a ground of discrimination in the 2010-11 fiscal year (April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011), and 2011-12 fiscal year (April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012). In both the 2010-11 and 2011-12 fiscal years, Muslims accounted for the highest number of HRTO applications citing creed as a ground of discrimination, closely followed by Christians (of all denominations). While Christians overall are not over-represented among applicant groups relative to their population size,[64] they are involved in a significant number of HRTO cases, lending some credence to the perception that Christians may also feel like “minorities” at times in Ontario’s increasingly secular society (in some cases, despite being a majority). All human rights applications must cite a Code “social area” as well as a prohibited ground of discrimination. The distribution of creed applications across social areas is broadly consistent with larger trends in HRTO applications. Our review of the 2011-2012 HRTO creed applications revealed that religious accommodation issues, mostly in employment contexts, featured prominently (in just over 42% of creed applications) among the kinds of discrimination issues alleged in applications (see the graph below). While this number appears relatively low, it may not reflect the actual extent of discrimination experienced by various communities in Ontario, due to such factors as under-reporting, mis-reporting, and the unknown outcome of applications alleging discrimination.[62] HRTO application statistics reported on here provide a description of the number and nature of applications citing creed as a ground of discrimination filed at the HRTO.
Because many applications claim discrimination based on more than one ground, the totals in the chart far exceed the total number of applications received.
According to the 2011 National Household Survey, Muslims made up 4.6% of Ontario’s population in 2011. Among creed groups, Christians (of all denominations) [65] accounted for the second highest number of HRTO applications citing creed as a ground of discrimination, in both the 2010-11 and 2011-12 fiscal years. There was also an observed tendency among some some applicants, particularly in 2011-12, to elevate what may appear to be more isolated opinions and beliefs to the level of a creed (e.g.
Only 14% of HRTO creed applications in 2011-2012, and just over one-quarter (or 28.6%) in 2011-2012, only cited creed as a ground of discrimination.


Almost 73% of all 2011-2012 HRTO applications citing creed, and 62% of 2010-2011 HRTO creed applications, identified employment as the social area. It is difficult to infer the extent to which this may reflect wider trends in creed discrimination. Upon further OHRC review of these applications, we discovered that not all of the applications we recieved from the HRTO actually cited creed as a ground. In some cases, applicants were discriminated against because of their perceived creed, which in some cases was different than their actual creed. It does not refer simply to persons self-identifying specifically as “Christian” by affiliation. Jews, however, accounted for a disrproportionate 10.7% of HRTO creed applications in 2011-12.
These findings are not comparable with how the HRTO reports its application data, by region, or how we have here reported on the 2011-12 HRTO creed applications, both of which classify region by postal code. Vous pouvez avoir votre contenu inaccessible via ce site - en l'excluant de l'indexation par le robot de Bing. It is difficult to gauge how much this may reflect broader trends, in part for the above-mentioned factors. People identifying as non-religious – whether atheist, agnostic or simply non-religious – accounted for a relatively small number (2 or 1.4%) of HRTO creed applications in 2011-12, but a larger portion (some 5%) in 2010-2011. The area of services, goods and facilities was cited in 24.3% of 2011-12 creed applications, and housing accounted for almost 3%. Such differences in the numbers of applications filed by males compared to females could reflect a variety of causes (including, potentially, the greater propensity for men to report alleged incidents of discrimination).


In such cases, the perceived creed was counted, because of our interest in the bases’ of discrimination on the ground of creed. This data, however, does give a more precise sense of where allegations of discrimination are occurring. This initiative is based on the reality that "One Can Make a Difference." That means you and me!
The extent to which this pattern in reporting is unique, or similar to wider trends in HRTO applications, cannot currently be determined, since the HRTO does not track demographic information on the sex of applicant groups.
Furthermore, since discrimination based on creed is often intertwined with discrimination based on other sometimes closely inter-related grounds (e.g.
The review of HRTO applications, moreover, revealed that Muslims were not the only target of such trends.
A similar pattern was evident in HRTO creed-based applications in the 2010-11 fiscal year (see Appendix 22.6).
Arguments for not limiting the definition of creed to religion and including secular ethical and moral beliefs3.



Dnv gl the netherlands
Nine news diabetes cure ebook




Comments

  1. PARTIZAN

    Non-insulin injectable diabetes drugs do not provide good-enough diabetes control held.

    09.01.2016

  2. Lady_baby

    Diets that have been high in animal sedative.

    09.01.2016