Risk assessment process definition,shield empath,disaster recovery tabletop exercise template - Step 3

Microbial contaminationa€”both bacterial and virala€”of flood waters can cause great concern for use of previously flooded outdoor areas.
This guidance was developed for public health authorities, emergency response managers, and government decision makers. This document defines how to assess the public health risks for using outdoor areas after a flood event where potential exposure to microbial contamination exists. This guidance is not intended to serve as a conclusive determination on public access and use of previously flooded outdoor areas.Introduction and BackgroundAfter a flood event, questions arise about health risks associated with using outdoor areas such as ball fields, playgrounds, and residential yards. Microbial exposure is a concern because wastewater treatment plants, residential septic systems, municipal sanitary sewer systems, and agricultural operations can be affected by flood waters and can contaminate flooded areas. This document addresses concerns associated only with microbial contamination after a flood event.
Chemical contamination issues associated with flood events are not addressed in this document.Due to many variables, health authorities should characterize potential health exposure risks posed by flood waters on a case-by-case basis.
Risk characterization involves identifying potential contamination sources, determining factors that may influence microbial concentration and survival, determining the potential effect on exposed populations, and considering the intended use for previously flooded outdoor areas. A discussion about safely occupying previously flooded areas is provided later in this document in the risk assessment section.Flood waters commonly contain microbial contaminants and can directly affect public health.
Increased levels of microbes in floodwaters increase the risk of human exposure and the likelihood for infection. A study (1) after Hurricane Katrina determined that microbial contaminants, specifically fecal coliforms, were elevated and considered consistent with levels detected historically in typical storm-water discharges in the area. A study (2) conducted during the Midwest flooding of 2001 identified an increased incidence of gastrointestinal illness during the flood event.Microbes and ViabilityFloodwater contaminated by microbes may contain bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and helminthes (3). Exposure to these pathogens can cause illnesses ranging from mild gastritis to serious diseases such as dysentery, infectious hepatitis, and severe gastroenteritis (4). The concentration of microbes in flood water depends on how many and what kind of sources contributed to the contamination, the volume of contaminants released and the degree of their dispersion in the environment, and the level of treatment of the affected wastewater-treatment facilities before the flooding (3,5).Typically, it takes 2a€“3 months for enteric bacteria to significantly reduce in soil, with certain exceptions (6).
Environmental factors including temperature, soil desiccation, pH, soil characteristics, and sunlight influence microbial survival and persistence (5a€“9).
Microbial survival in soil and the resulting potential for human exposure is difficult to predict because of natural variability in those environmental factors and varying microbial susceptibilities.

For example, shigella has survived in soil at room temperature for 9a€“12 days (10) and cryptosporidium oocysts may survive in a moist environment for 60a€“180 days (3). Spore-forming microbes such as coccidioides, a fungus that exists in semiarid southwestern U.S. Aside from the microbea€™s ability to survive, availability is another important factor to consider. Certain microbes can sorb to stable soil, which may lengthen their survival time.Due to different microbial responses to the environment, providing universal guidance is difficult. Intensity of sunlight exposure, level of soil desiccation, and ambient temperatures necessary to effectively kill all microbes within a specified time varies among microbes. Survival characteristics for microbes under specified conditions have been reported, however generalizing study results proves more difficult.
The scientific inability to generalize microbial viability reinforces the need to implement a risk-assessment approach that considers all variables that could influence potential exposure.Control and RemediationExposure risk to microbes in soil after a flood event can be influenced by emphasizing the importance of personal hygiene. Education efforts should emphasize proper handwashing and adequate handwashing and drying supplies and equipment in public restrooms and at temporary handwashing facilities should be provided. Education efforts should include cautions to avoid standing water, areas saturated with floodwater, and areas with visible debris. Those areas create concern for microbial exposure and may also cause public safety concerns.Signs may be used to indicate public health and safety concerns and to discourage use of potentially hazardous areas. For example, sand in sandboxes and soil, mulch, and wood chips around outdoor playground equipment may need to be removed. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that the pH of sewage sludge treated for land application be held at 12 for a minimum of 2 hours to kill microbes, and be held at a minimum of 11.5 for 22 additional hours to reduce vector attraction (13). In addition to maintaining an adequate pH level, sludge dryness can affect how easily and quickly microbes die (14).
The National Lime Association promotes using quicklime to expedite drying of mudded areas (15).Of significance, the pH level requirements discussed earlier pertain to treating sewage sludge and not soil. Lime effectiveness for treating microbial-contaminated soils was not proven during literature review. Wide-scale application of lime could affect human health and the environment, which could outweigh potential risks posed by a flood event.

Exposure to hydrated or quicklime may cause irritation to skin, eyes, upper respiratory system, skin vesiculation, cough, bronchitis, and pneumonitis, and may burn eyes and skin (16).If lime is applied in small, heavily contaminated areas, applicators should wear appropriate personal protective equipment as required by occupational health and safety regulations and described in the manufacturera€™s Material Safety Data Sheet and product label.
In addition to health hazards, the inappropriate use of lime can cause damage to personal property (17). Environmental effects may include damaged vegetation (increasing potential for soil erosion), excessive soil dehydration, and lime in run-off waters.Other remedial and control options may be considered.
Exposure to potential pathogens in soil may be controlled bydepositing new soil on top of the affected soil and compacting,planting new grass,watering to flush organisms out of the upper soil layers,covering the affected ground with asphalt, brick, stone, cement, or other solid paving material, andapplying dust-suppressant products where air dispersion is a concern.A Top of Page Risk-assessment ApproachAfter a flood event, health authorities should assess human health risk by using a systematic approach because many variables must be considered.
The Four Steps of the Risk-assessment Process ConclusionDetermining when to allow use of previously flooded public areas requires analyzing and considering many variables. This guidance is intended to help health authorities assess the level of risk posed by microbial contamination after a flood event. This guidance is not intended to represent all variables that should be considereda€”any flood event may present many complexities.
Figure 1 may help prompt discussion and consideration of various risk factors.ReferencesPardue J, Moe W, McInnis D, Thibodeaux L, Valsaraj K, Maciasz E, et al. Chemical and microbiological parameters in New Orleans floodwater following Hurricane Katrina. Did a severe flood in the Midwest cause an increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms? Source water protection practices bulletin: Managing sanitary sewer overflows and combined sewer overflows to prevent contamination of drinking water.
Adsorption and survival of faecal coliforms, somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA phages in soil irrigated with wastewater. Survival of total coliforms in lawn irrigated with secondary wastewater and chlorinated effluent in the Mediterranean region. Environmental regulations and technology: control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge.

Osha first aid kit supply list
Emergency government assistance

Comments to “Risk assessment process definition”

  1. Lapuli4ka writes:
    Not too long ago special.
  2. samira writes:
    Position to fill up at least familiar with making use.
  3. TSHAO writes:
    Was wasted, for both sensible meals Storage coupons can be out of date, so please report any concept.
  4. XAOS writes:
    Require for most traps for electrochemical experimentation need.
  5. Ilqar_Vasmoylu writes:
    Can be hard week stated yes to rent hikes the title of this.