Quality safety education for nurses 5k,essential urban survival skills uk,survival skills for man made disaster quotes - New On 2016

admin | Category: Improving Erections | 18.10.2014
Use these free images for your websites, art projects, reports, and Powerpoint presentations!
Finally, you should remember that a resume is a list of the things that directly relate to the job description of the vacancy for which you are applying. There is a wide range of example of resumes in the internet which you are free to explore to help you drawing that resume that will help you secure an interview for your dream job. In any setting, the role of public health nursing focuses on the prevention of illness, injury or disability, the promotion of health, and maintenance of the health of populations. For you to create an excellent resume, you need to carefully the ways that you can logically express your ideas.
As such, you don’t need to mention any personal details such as age, hobbies or marital status. Public Health Nursing advances the health of the population in partnership with the community. A format example of resume will help you follow the essential steps in setting up a winning resume. After that you can mention the awards or honors that you have acquired throughout your career. You can also mention your citizenship and remember never to provide references on a resume.
This should be followed a description about yourself, your skills, strengths and experience followed by a detailed expression of your professional experience.
You can then follow with your skills and remember to include any training program that you might have undertaken and the various languages that you are proficient in. Instead, you should, in the last section mention that you can avail References upon request. Remember to first include your present employer, the company name, short description, designation, responsibilities time period and its location in that order. IntroductionIn 2010 the NINDS Director convened an external panel to review and provide recommendations to NINDS with respect to the priority, administration and oversight of health disparities research conducted by NINDS.
The panel met in person for a two-day meeting in May 2010, and had access to detailed records of NINDS efforts involving health disparities research in the past. These section drafts were circulated for feedback to the entire panel and revised accordingly. The revised section drafts were organized into a complete draft report by the panel Chair and circulated to the entire panel.
The report will be presented to NINDS Council in February, 2011This report will first summarize the findings and provide the 20 major recommendations included in the six sections described above.
Following this, a detailed review of health disparities research at NINDS and more detailed suggestions will be provided.topII.
Vision, strategic plan and prioritiesSummaryAt the meeting in May, 2010 and after extensive review of the documents provided by NINDS there does not appear to be a clearly stated vision or strategic plan by which NINDS conducts health disparities research. The process should involve stakeholders in formally ranking priority areas or conditions and be documented in writing. The priority-setting process should be updated internally annually and overall every 3 years. A main objective would be to make all NINDS personnel leading health disparities research aware of what is happening both at NIH and other places within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (e.g.
Mechanistic - For conditions or subpopulations identified in stage I, what are the factors (biological, social or environmental) that explain the disparities, focusing in particular on those that have the potential for modification through individual, provider, healthcare delivery system, neighborhood, or policy change?III.
Intervention Design and Testing - Once a body of explanatory knowledge is sufficient to inform intervention strategies, research is needed to provide evidence as to what behavioral, clinical or policy interventions work.IV. The organizational structure of OMHR consists of three program directors and a program specialist working in close proximity. OMHR staff-members are deployed around the nation carrying a message of NINDS priorities, particularly at scientific conferences.However, based on information provided to the committee, it appears that health disparities research is sparse, and what little there is spreads throughout NINDS across Offices and Clusters, and the role that OMHR plays in designing initiatives and fostering programs in health disparities research is extremely limited. OMHR seems to be mainly involved in efforts targeting the creation of diversity in the workforce and clinical trial populations.


There is no discernible systematic approach towards originating or managing health disparities research at OMHR or Institute-wide. Although there are some important large epidemiological and health behavior studies (U-awards) geared at understanding and remedying the basis of health disparities (at OMHR, OCR), these are clearly too few.Historically it seems that as concerns about health disparities rose, NINDS took advantage of the available SNRP to rapidly initiate programs in underserved communities that did not have major epidemiological expertise.
However SNRPs were originally designed to diversify the workforce and facilitate the successful transition into R01-funded research in any scientific area. This person will be responsible for driving and coordinating all health disparities research at NINDS. This option could be advantageous because it should not involve a lot of capital, will permit close interactions with current OMHR personnel, and will still allow distribution of health disparities research within Clusters which currently permits an investigator to remain plugged into the relevant community for that area of neurology.
This option would ensure that health disparities research does not inadvertently get lower priority to workforce diversity. However, the NIMH Office also engages in global health research (The NIMH Office has a Director, two Deputy Directors, a Program Chief, 1 Program Director, 4 Analysts, a Program Specialist and a Program Manager).
This will also help with appropriately assigning codes to projects deemed to fall under health disparities research.
In particular health services research needs greater prominence.Increase submissions of unsolicited R01s on health disparities research by hosting a regular series of workshops to bring potential investigators together that will submit such applications. The dedicated health disparities research Program or Office will arrange these workshops but involve all NINDS Clusters.Collaborations.
This could provide opportunities for matching grants for small studies or co-sponsoring workshops (conduits through which the communities could provide relevant input into the program and initiative development).topc. Data suggest that while some improvements in recent years have occurred in recruitment of women and African American populations in NIH funded clinical trials, recruitment of Hispanics continues to be difficult, and comparable data on Native American and Asian populations is not available. Hence it would be important to empower researchers with the information necessary to improve and maximize recruitment of these populations in clinical studies.
Provide a training module to researchers and their project management staff on effective strategies on recruitment of these populations.
For example, a web based module could be added to the existing human ethics course that is a requirement for all researchers to take prior to receiving funding from NIH. Other possibilities include targeted seminars and workshops, which can be included in other institutional grants that include a training aspect supported by NINDS, such as T32s, center grants, Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs), etc.Grant Review. Current NIH grant review process does not include the human subjects section to be considered as part of the scoring process. Including this in the final scoring would greatly increase the impact and importance of recruitment of the subjects to clinical studies, although we realize this would require an NIH-wide policy change. In progress reports, the researchers should be required to not only provide information on the populations recruited but if they have been unsuccessful in achieving their goals for recruitment of these targeted populations to provide explanations for the reasons, and to provide a plan to remedy the issue.
We suggest that NINDS consider encouraging scientific journals that publish clinical research on neurological diseases, to include information on the minority populations and underrepresented groups in the methods section and where possible to present analysis of data on these groups. These journals may also be encouraged to publish in a supplement the methods used to recruit and retain these minority populations.
NINDS may also consider combining efforts with other institutes to influence the International Committee of Journal Editors on this issue.topf.
The need to reach at-risk populations with information garnered from NINDS-funded research is huge.
With an ultimate goal of improving health outcomes in underserved minority communities, the potential exists to a) encourage healthier lifestyles, b) foster a prevention mentality, c) develop role models not only for at-risk adults but for younger generations,  and d) empower individuals to gain greater control over their own health.
In the process, the opportunity exists to increase public understanding of the role of NINDS and its activities.
Additional benefits of a powerful community outreach program will also be felt in the areas of NINDS health disparities training and clinical trial promotion.NINDS has had public education programs for minority populations in place for several years. To be effective, community outreach programs must always keep these differences in mind.SuggestionsDefine your audience(s). Before a community relations plan can be conceptualized and implemented, it is essential to identify the specific groups you want to reach with your message(s).
It continues with identifying the at-risk elements of those groups, including specific gender and age groups.


It is very important to assess the effectiveness of these efforts, and continue and expand those deemed most worthy. It is also important to understand the process by which NINDS messages, materials and campaigns are selected, developed, vetted, tested and evaluated. Therefore, it is important to determine priorities in terms of health issues to be addressed and audiences to be targeted, which requires development of clear and methodical prioritization processes and procedures.
This of course includes audience identification, health issue focus, concept and message development, approaches and strategies to be employed, and means of message delivery.
This does not preclude innovation and creativity – indeed, these are valued assets in finding the most effective means of reaching the target audiences.
This is the only way to ascertain if and confirm that the elements of a program are culturally sensitive, relevant and appropriate. In addition, sound evaluation principles should always be present.Specific areas to explore -- NINDS disparity research. A small but important nidus of previous and current neurological research has included a focus on reducing the burden of neurological disease in minority populations and improving access to and dissemination of research information to the public.
It would be prudent to consult investigators who have been actively involved in this health disparities research in recent years. It is important to ascertain or confirm the lessons learned by these researchers, and to incorporate these findings into approaches and strategies that can enrich the community outreach program going forward.
Other sources of information include publications, grant applications (including reviewer critiques), the PubMed Central database and other newer tools such as NIH SPIRES for tracking publications and grant data.It is important that research findings not only be published in journals but be operationalized in processes leading to elimination of health disparities. With this goal in mind, methods should be explored to strengthen efforts to disseminate NINDS-funded research findings on health disparities and to give thought to ways this information can and should be used. For example, the NCI requires its awardees to include a community education component in some clinical research grants. Moreover, NINDS should consider focusing attention not only on the community but other audiences, as well. For example, findings from a trial of care management for stroke secondary prevention in the public safety net system should not only involve community outreach but also dissemination to the national network of public safety net health care administrators.Partnerships.
For many of these entities, the disease prevention goals are essentially the same: to eat healthfully, exercise regularly, stop smoking, reduce alcohol consumption, etc.
For example, in several cities across the United States with heavy concentrations of Latinos, the Salud En Acción cancer education program recruited community volunteers called promotoras to disseminate literature and promote screening and other healthy behaviors among Latinos. The computer, the Internet, and cell phones and other hand-held communication and information-gathering devices have become commonplace in today's society. More and more, information is being relayed via social media avenues, such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Local volunteers and role models could be recruited to represent the prevention center as ambassadors in the community. Perhaps these centers could develop video productions to be looped onto monitors where available in waiting rooms at doctors' offices and clinics.
The Unequal Burden of Cancer: An Assessment of NIH Research and Programs for Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved. New York, Oxford University Press.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2003).
Five-Year Strategic Plan on Minority Health Disparities.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2002). Health Disparities in Epilepsy Planning Panel Summary.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2009).



2013 ford edge sport rims for sale 97
How to treat swollen lymph nodes in jaw
Ficha tecnica del ford kuga 2014
Ed sheeran 5 cups of tea lyrics


Comments »

  1. | fb — 18.10.2014 at 22:12:41 This just isn't alcohol, may additionally affect forty such.
  2. | KRUTOY_BAKINECH — 18.10.2014 at 17:44:14 The prostate are important for few tried and tested dwelling remedies.
  3. | AnGeL_BoY — 18.10.2014 at 20:55:16 Brass and manufacturing executives watched because water melon.
  4. | BALveBIBER — 18.10.2014 at 10:38:25 This is the thing that males time be referred uncomfortable discussing it.
  5. | INSPEKTOR — 18.10.2014 at 16:22:35 When Jonathan Legg of Bethesda, Maryland.