Example op ed piece 2014,eve desolate site escalation,first aid jobs coventry walsgrave,homemade zombie survival kit list bronze - Reviews

admin | Category: Electile Dysfunction 2016 | 01.05.2015
Another op-ed piece ran directly below Collier’s article, written by a black columnist named Alvin Hall. Opinion pieces – such as op-eds and blog posts – are a great way to get out your organization’s message on your own terms and timeline.  What, however, will make your piece stand out and get selected for a newspaper’s opinion page or picked up on a blog?  We suggest a few tips for creating persuasive and unique op-eds and blog posts. For example: This op-ed on health care reform offers an expert’s look at the issue at a very timely moment – the 3rd anniversary of the Affordable Care Act. In an April 23, 2010 Op-Ed piece for The New York Times entitled “Ending the Slavery Blame-Game,” Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. The article is a perfect example of the “educated Negro” who has been taught to find his “proper place” at the back door, as stated by Dr. It behooves the United States, therefore, in the interest both of scientific truth and of future social reform, carefully to study such chapters of her history as that of the suppression of the slave-trade. The previous comment which commands a man be shot!!!, let alone the odious homophobia it expresses which is a minor offense by comparison, needs to be reported and taken down NOW! I hear you, but I think that Skip Gates is about something more complex than your immediate response recognizes. Do you think that one of the reasons Skip Gates (echoing Hannah Arendt in Eichmann in Jerusalem) is reminding us of these complicities of the past- “the banality of evil” – is to urge us ALL to look into the NOW regarding how we may be complicit in current atrocities? Interestingly, when Hannah Arendt attempted to describe similar complicites, as a warning to future generations and countries anywhere, the mainstream Jewish establishment attacked her and attempted to oversimplify what she revealed. At the end of the trial, she wrote her equally famed, and still highly controversial, work Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Arendt’s work matters then and NOW – and young people are drawn to the complexities it still reveals. In Europe, the collapse of communist totalitarianism contributed to the renewed interest in Arendt’s work. The main thesis of Eichmann in Jerusalem was summed up (not very felicitously) in its subtitle. She concluded that Eichmann’s inability to speak coherently in court was connected with his incapacity to think, or to think from another person’s point of view.
In The Origins of Totalitarianism she still held to a Kantian notion of radical evil, the evil that, under the Nazis corrupted the basis or moral law, exploded legal categories, and defied human judgment. Eichmann was ambitious and eager to rise in the ranks, but he would not have killed his superior to inherit his job.
Similarly, long before Arendt’s book, many in Israel and elsewhere had charged the Judenrate with complicity with the Nazi scheme. What was new and especially provocative in Arendt’s account was the insistence on challenging Jewish communal leadership. Some community leaders were well aware that the deportees were going directly to Auschwitz (and not to some resettlement area in the east as the Nazis claimed).
If the Judenrate had not been so “Germanically” disciplined, if they hadn’t compiled detailed lists of potential deportees, if they hadn’t supplied the Nazis with these lists, if they had refrained from collecting the keys and detailed inventories of vacated apartments for the Nazis to hand over to “Aryans,” if they hadn’t summoned the deportees to show up on a certain day, at a certain hour, at a certain railway stations with provisions for a three-or four-day journey, would fewer people have died? Thinking, judging, and acting were closely linked in this and in other books by Hannah Arendt.
As Tony Judt wrote a few years ago in The New York Review of Books, Arendt made many small errors for which her critics will never forgive her.
Skip Gates, with others, seem to be rendering a critique and warning – very similar to those of Hannah Arendt.
Davey D, who is that to whom you refer as “notorious for hating Black folks as evidence by today passage banning of ethnic studies”?
You seem to have no conception that Jews, by the hundreds of thousands, also have stood against racism in all its forms. The entire piece is laced with ad-hominem attacks, rather than actually addressing what Gates wrote.
And where the piece does actually try to engage Gate’s, it engages in silly distortions and editorializing. Can I just say what a comfort to discover someone who actually what they’re discussing on the internet. Even the German government’s own commissioned independent committee of expert advisors recommends that the EEG renewable energy feed-in act be scrapped altogether. In the op-ed piece Hendricks for example claims that Germany is on track to reduce its CO2 emissions by 40% compared to 1990 levels. Hendricks also claims that between 1990 and 2012 greenhouse gas emissions in the EU fell by 18% while the overall economy grew by around 45%. Much of the achieved reductions resulted from the shut-down of filthy, dilapidated, communist-run Eastern European industries after the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall.
Hendricks also fails to mention that much of the generated 30% renewable electricity is done so when the energy is not even needed. The op-ed piece by Barbara Hendricks resembles nothing a normal person would ever expect from a minister of a government based on democratic values. Social-democrat redistribution in Germany generally exploits the working population and rewards a class of parasitic cronies. Ususally politicians simply waste wealth, and act like cute parasite …this time they are killing the beast.
It might be that they see depopulation of the countryside as their goal, which wind turbines accomplish masterfully, it is a UN Agenda 21 goal, and a goal of the Fabians since 1884, as it converges with their desired abolition of private property.
Her comments remind me of “Complete denial of obvious facts can be a remarkably effective tactic.
Indeed John, if the economic growth rate has been anything less than 2% then the EU performance has been truly pathetic. Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations. Until the German public stop voting for these jokers there is very little you can do, except rage at the senselessness of it all.
If there is shortfall of electricity in Germany, you have connections to the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, the Czech republic, France and more. Until that day the Greenies and the rest of the sandal wearing brigade will keep on preaching to righteous and keep being elected, and you will be in a minority. So, this is a Volksfront against the Sweden Democrats, who were expected to win big in the snap elections. All the sheep of different colours are now huddling together in one big herd, terrified of the threat to their consensus, which refuses to include anyone not sharing their frankly extreme views on immigration. Many years ago there was a big campaign and even a decision in Sweden to shut down all nuclear power plants. The truth is switching to 100% renewable electricity would affect Europe’s imports very little.
Ironically, oil and gas do not compete with PV and wind – but they do compete with electricity, mostly in heating and cooking.


The New Year is an appropriate time to celebrate the end to sixty-nine years of totalitarian rule by arrogant fools. When governments promote propaganda, it is to bluff the people in order for the government to achieve an outcome it needs to achieve for whatever reasons. Write from a perspective that only you can offer – as you’re starting out with your op-ed or blog post, ask yourself what unique perspective you can provide to readers.  Are you an expert on or have a unique understanding of an issue? Make it personal with a story – we recommend including a story in your op-ed or blog post that brings a human face to the issue you’re writing about.  This could be a personal experience of your own, or a re-telling from someone else.  Why is this important? The most obvious question which this study suggests is : How far in a State can a recognized moral wrong safely be compromised? DuBois who over a span of seven decades as academic, scholar, sociologist, author, editor, civil rights activist and Pan-Africanist  was truly an educated black man. She sat in on the famous trial of Nazi Adolph Eichmann, scouring the documents and testimonies. A kind of excommunication seemed to have been imposed on the author by the Jewish establishment in America. In Israel, where the Holocaust was long seen as simply the culmination of a long unbroken line of anti-Semitism, from pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar to Hitler and Arafat – David Ben-Guirion, the architect of the 1960 show trial wanted it that way – the growing interest among young people in this book suggest a search for a different view.
Interest was further kindled by the publications, in the past several years, of Arendt’s voluminous correspondence with Karl Jaspers, Mary McCarthy, Hermann Broch, Kurt Blumenfeld, Martin Heidegger, and her husband Heinrich Blucher. It is odd, and sometimes mind-boggling to follow the overheated debates of four decades ago. She became more and more disillusioned with official Zionist policy in Palestine because of its failure to achieve a peaceful modus vivendi with the Arab population.
In Eichmann in Jerusalem, and in the bitter controversies about it that followed, she insisted that only good had any depth.
Six years before the book came out, in a sensational libel case heard in the District Court of Jerusalem, the presiding judge had spoken far more critically about the Judenrate and about Jewish collaboration with the Nazis than Arendt did in that brief passage. That the Jews did have leaders and notables and local national organizations was well known.
Then she decided it was because she had inadvertently dragged out a past that had not been laid to rest….
Throwing out a bunch of names and generalities of famous black leaders and scholars does not equate to adequately addressing the arguments proffered by Gates. The truth here is that Germany’s CO2 emissions have been rising over the past couple of years and the token (illusory) measures Germany decreed some weeks ago are widely viewed as mere actionism.
Here Hendricks forgets to mention that almost every single solar system manufacturer in Germany has gone bankrupt – resulting in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs, read here and here. Not only are German power consumers paying among the highest utility prices worldwide but Germany’s renewable energy feed-in act is called by many experts the biggest wealth redistribution scheme from the poor to the rich. The situation in western civilization is such that anything can be said and accepted if you belong to the political correct side. Most people will snooze through it – we deride it – but is there anyone who takes it seriously? It will take a blackout of basically the whole European grid before the German consumers will see their power being cut-off. Sweden has big problems with financing the costs of integration of immigrants, but this simple fact is totally ignored by all parties except SD. But when this seemingly united front no longer is aligned with what a large part of the electorate thinks, there is a danger to democracy. So the electricity price increases caused by renewable subsidies may end up causing greater oil and gas consumption. However, the main issue with click-bait journalism is that most people will not make it past the headline that made them take notice the first place.
Do you have a personal connection to a particular topic?  If an issue you care about is in the news, it’s a particularly good time to seize the opportunity with an opinion piece.  Channel that into a persuasive and interesting piece that only you can write.
Anecdotes or stories are a way for your audience to understand and empathize with your perspective. And although this chapter of history can give us no definite answer suited to the ever-varying aspects of political life, yet it would seem to warn any nation from allowing, through carelessness and moral cowardice, any social evil to grow. As the Director of the institute at Harvard which bears his name it is my hope that this may provide some future guidance to Professor Gates that he might escape the syndrome of the “educated Negro” who has been Mis-Educated.
Irving Howe claimed in his memoirs that the polemic in America was partly due to feelings of guilt, pervasive, and unmanageable yet seldom (until then) emerging into daylight. Her initial reaction, expressed in letters to Jaspers, McCarthy, and Blucher, was impressionistic. She plowed through the 3,000-page transcript of Eichmann’s pretrial interrogation by the Israeli police captain Avner Less and gradually came to think that it was mostly, as she first put it, a kind of brainlessness on Eichmann’s part that had predisposed him to becoming the faceless bureaucrat of death and one of the worst criminals of all time. He personified neither hatred or madness nor an insatiable thirst for blood, but something far worse, the faceless nature of Nazi evil itself, within a closed system run by pathological gangsters, aimed at dismantling the human personality of its victims. Good can be radical; evil can never be radical, it can only be extreme, for it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension yet – and this is its horror! It was his “banality” that predisposed him to become one of the greatest criminals of his time, Arendt claimed.
Similar charges had been made for years in several well-known books, Jean-Francois Steiner’s Treblinka, Tadeusz Borowski’s This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen, and, of course, Raul Hilberg’s monumental The Destruction of European Jews, a book that Arendt repeatedly referred to. Her answers, offered only tentatively, derived from her view of the function of truth in politics. On the other had, why didn’t the leaders of the Jewish councils refuse to accept the responsibilities assigned them by the Nazis? But Arendt went further, implying that Jewish leaders had inadvertently allowed themselves to fall into a fiendish trap and become part of the system of victimization. In her lifetime, Arendt continued to be marked, as it were, by the debate set off by her book. If we want to engage in denial of history and complexity, then perhaps such attacks could stand.
Max Planck Institute researcher Axel Borsch-Supan says Germany’s Energiewende is bordering on suicide. Also Germany’s leading power companies such as RWE have been shedding thousands of high-paying power sector jobs and spilling red ink. What’s worse is that hundreds of thousands of households have had their electricity shut off because it is no longer affordable. Well the readers of Grist and such, but those are a tiny bunch of middle aged females according to Alexa data.
And your politician can keep on spouting the green rubbish as she is protected by her electorate and strangely enough the highly sophisticated electric grid. Paper mills suffering micro outages rip their paper rolls; leading to hours of missed production, same for other highly mechanized assembly lines.


SD did not even demand a reduction in immigration in order to support the social democrat budget, they only demanded that there should not be an increase. They still have nuclear power though, realism won through after all, although some plants were closed.
No persons would have seen the Civil War with more surprise and horror than the Revolutionists of 1776; yet from the small and apparently dying institution of their day arose the walled and castled Slave-Power.
It is perhaps no accident that at this time of a highly controversial war in Iraq, Arendt’s books are still widely read and that, even though close to 300,000 copies of her book on Eichmann alone have so far been sold, this new edition is now published by Penguin. In the past, the difficulty of many Israelis to accept Arendt’s book ran parallel to another difficulty – foreseen by Arendt early on – the difficulty of confronting, morally and politically, the plight of the dispossessed Palestinians. Not long before, Israeli diplomats had successfully convinced the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith that criticism of Zionism or Israel was a form of anti-Semitism. Her intuitions of the nature of political evil may find more sympathetic ears these days than when the book was first published. He isn’t even sinister, she wrote (Arendt used the common German term unheimlich, which can also be translated as “uncanny”) He was like a “ghost in a spiritualist sauce.” What was more, he had a cold and was sneezing inside his bullet-proof glass cage….
The Nazis had succeeded in turning the legal order on its head, making the wrong and malevolent the foundation of a new “righteousness.” In the Third Reich evil lost its distinctive characteristic by which most people had until then recognized it.
She complained that while in the trial Eichman had been accused, absurdly she though, of having been the very architect, the brain, behind the Holocaust, his essential brainlessness was never even brought up or discussed.
Unable to see through the Nazi scheme, acting in the vain hope that they were serving the best interests of local Jews, the distinguished notables of the Judenrate had inadvertently become instruments of Nazi determination to eliminate a maximum number of Jews with a minimum of administrative effort and cost. Should the Judenrate have told the Jews the truth, when they knew it, about where they were being deported to?
Insofar as they had moral authority, why didn’t they advise the Jews to run for their lives or try to go underground?
Even though many years have passed since she died, she is still the subject of controversy. Gates is simply asserting that Africans played more of a role in the Atlantic slave trade that is often historically recognized.
In other countries this would have appeared a reasonable view, at least as a basis for negotiation.
The Palestinians bore no responsibility for the collapse of civilization in Europe but ended up being punished for it. Some of the published attacks on Arendt’s book are astonishing in their unbridled vehemence.
Evil, as she say it, need not be committed only by demonic monsters but – with disastrous effect – by morons and imbeciles as well, especially if, as we see in our own day, their deeds are sanctioned by religious authority. He was probably not lying when he told Less that he could never be a doctor because he could not bear the sight of blood.
If there had been no Jewish organizations at all and no Judenrate, Arendt suggested, the deportation machine could not have run as smoothly as it did.
One saw this a few years ago when a sensational book was published on the innocent love affair she had as a teenager with Martin Heidegger. At the height of the scandal over Eichmann in Jerusalem, Jaspers wrote to console her: a time will come, he wrote, which she will not live to see, when Jews will erect a monument to her in Israel as they were just then doing for Spinoza.
In Israel the reaction was more complicated and the criticism was muted compared to the reaction in America. With her disregard of conventional scholarship and academic norms, she remains a stimulating intellectual presence.
Conventional goodness became a mere temptation which most Germans were fast learning to resist. It defies though for as soon as though tries to engage itself with evil and examine the premises and principles from which it originates, it is frustrated because if finds nothing there. But it also was left unmentioned because Eichmann’s trial was a show trial, staged by Ben-Gurion at least partly for political reasons to prove conclusively that the Holocaust had simply been the largest anti-Semitic pogrom in history. Dostoevsky would not have regarded Arendt’s “banality of evil” as a cheap catchword, as Gershom Scholem did in an open letter to Arendt accusing her of heartlessness. The Nazis might have been forced to drag out millions of people, one by one from their homes. What would Arendt have said of these leaders if they had fled abroad, as many of them certainly could have, abandoning the Jews who depended on them? The author depicted her as a self-hating Jew and as a silly bimbo sexually entrapped for life by her aging Nazi professor, a married man with two children. Today’s readers may be more willing to accept both her essays and her book on Eichmann on their merits. Outrage was much less pronounced perhaps because on a first reading, Arendt’s critique of Jewish communal leaders in Nazi-occupied Europe appeared to confirm Zionish cliche descriptions of “diaspora Jews” as servile, passive lambs who had meekly gone to the slaughter. Thirty or forty years ago the mixture of social analysis, journalism, philosophical reflection, psychology, literary allusion, and anecdote found in the best of her work exasperated and annoyed critics. Within this upside-down world Eichmann (perhaps like Pol Pot four decades later) seemed not to have been aware of having done evil.
Would her argument have been less shocking had Arendt shown more understanding for the ghastly dilemmas facing the leaders who remained behind? The book gave a crude version of her long and complex relationship with Heidegger; yet some reviewers seemed to take a particular satisfaction in the book’s simplistic account.
In matters of elementary morality, Arendt warned, what had been thought of as decent instincts were no longer to be taken for granted. Before Arendt, others had emphasized the discrepancy between the personal mediocrity of monsters like Hitler or Stalin and the horrendous evil they unleashed on the world.
Would she have shocked less if she had raised questions about their behavior instead of contemptuously attacking them? Nearly everybody who attended the trials of mass killers after the war, some of them respected doctors and pharmacists, came away with the disconcerting impression that the killers looked pretty much like you and me. She did recognize that beleaguered people have a tendency to hope against hope that somehow things will turn out better if they can only buy time. The Israeli court psychiatrist who examined Eichmann found him a “completely normal man, more normal, at any rate, than I am after examining him,” the implication being that the coexistence of normality and bottomless cruelty explodes our ordinary conceptions and present the true enigma of the trial.
In a similar vein, Simone de Beauvoir said that at his trial after the war the French Nazi Pierre Laval seemed commonplace and inconsequential, an unimaginative and feeble little fellow. Would it have shocked less had she said explicitly that the Jewish leaders “inadvertently” collaborated in their own destruction?



Best books quantitative aptitude
Home remedies for swelling cold sores


Comments »

  1. | Princessa — 01.05.2015 at 19:28:26 Certified health skilled if in case you have contained in Male Extra.
  2. | DolmakimiOglan — 01.05.2015 at 13:23:51 Erection requires a sequence premature ejaculation.