Subject: Science
Grade Level: 6-8
Course Title: M/J Earth/Space Science
Course Code: (#2001010)
Submission Title: Amplify Science: Florida Edition Ð
Earth/Space Science
Bid ID: 3339
Publisher: Amplify Education, Inc.
Publisher ID: 13-4125483
To easily
access the citations in this correlation document, please log into the
curriculum website first with the teacher credentials provided by the Florida
Department of Education. The curriculum website must be viewed in a Google
Chrome or Apple Safari browser.
Each
citation linked below will open the standard in a new tab. You can also refer
to the Getting Started Guide for instructions on how to manually navigate to a
citation. Download all correlations documents here (ZIP). Download all correlations
documents here (ZIP).
Benchmark Code |
Benchmark |
LESSONS
WHERE STANDARD/BENCHMARK IS DIRECTLY ADDRESSED IN MAJOR TOOL (MOST IN-DEPTH
COVERAGE LISTED FIRST) |
PUBLISHER'S NOTE AND INSTRUCTIONS: Teacher logins can see both the teacher and student
material. Therefore, a citation of ÒUnit X, Lesson Y, Activity ZÓ is good for
both student material (lesson
text, activity instructions) and teacher material. |
||
SC.6.E.6.1
|
Describe and give examples of ways in which Earth's
surface is built up and torn down by physical and chemical weathering,
erosion, and deposition. |
This standard is addressed in the Rock
Transformations and Weather Patterns units. For example: In Rock Transformations: ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2 students explore a digital simulation
that models rock transformation processes, including weathering, erosion, and
deposition. ¥ In Lesson 2.1,in the activity titled ÒPlaying Understanding
WeatheringÓ, a video entitled Understanding Weathering illustrates how
weathering can alter landscapes. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activities 2 and 3 and Lesson 2.3, Activity 3, students read ÒDevilÕs TowerÓ an
article that describes how this geologic feature formed, including
descriptions of weathering, erosion, and deposition. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 3, students create diagrams that model
how weathering and erosion produce and move the sediment that can later form
sedimentary rocks. In Weather Patterns: ¥ In Lesson 1.5, Activity 4, students view the video entitled
Understanding Weathering and discuss how precipitation can alter the
geosphere. ¥ In Lesson 2.5, Activity 4, students read the article ÒAn
AstronautÕs View of FloridaÓ which describes how weathering, erosion, and
deposition have shaped the EarthÕs surface in Florida. |
SC.6.E.6.2 |
Recognize that there are a variety of different
landforms on Earth's surface such as coastlines, dunes, rivers, mountains,
glaciers, deltas, and lakes and relate these landforms as they apply to
Florida. |
This standard is fully addressed in the Weather Patterns
unit. In Lesson 2.5, Activity 4, students read the article ÒAn
AstronautÕs View of FloridaÓ which describes how weathering, erosion, and
deposition have shaped the EarthÕs surface in Florida. Students also consider examples of specific landforms
throughout the Rock Transformations, Plate Motion, and Plate Motion
Engineering Internship units. For example: In the Rock Transformations unit: ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2 students write an explanation of the
formation of rocks in the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains, and in Lesson 3.4, Activity 3 they create diagrams modeling these
explanations. ¥ Throughout Lesson 2.6, students investigate Hawaiian coastlines. In the Plate Motion unit: ¥ In Lesson 2.7, Activities 1 and 2, students investigate landforms
such as valleys, coastlines, and mountains in Iceland. In the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit: ¥ In Lesson 3, the Activity titled ÒResearching Plate BoundariesÓ, students use
evidence of landforms such as mountain ranges, volcanoes, and ocean trenches
to identify different types of plate boundary. |
SC.6.E.7.1 |
Differentiate among radiation, conduction, and
convection, the three mechanisms by which heat is transferred through Earth's
system. |
This standard is addressed in the Weather Patterns
unit. In Lesson 1.6, Activity 4, students read ÒDeath Valley: Three
Reasons Why It's So HotÓ, an article which describes how radiation,
conduction, and convection all contribute to Death ValleyÕs high
temperatures. |
SC.6.E.7.2 |
Investigate and apply how the cycling of water
between the atmosphere and hydrosphere has an effect on weather patterns and
climate. |
This standard is addressed throughout the Weather
Patterns unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.3, Activities 2 and 4, students conduct an experiment
and make observations of condensation. ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 3 students investigate the role of
evaporation in leading to precipitation. ¥ Lesson 1.3, Activity 3 and Lesson 1.5, Activity 3, students investigate the role of
condensation in producing clouds and precipitation. ¥ In Lesson 1.3, Activity 5, students read ÒWhat Makes Water MoveÓ
about the role of gravity in the water cycle. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activities 2 and 3, and Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students read and discuss ÒDisaster in
California!Ó, an article which describes the cycling of water between the
atmosphere and hydrosphere in California during a period of extreme weather. |
SC.6.E.7.3 |
Describe how global patterns such as the jet stream
and ocean currents influence local weather in measurable terms such as
temperature, air pressure, wind direction and speed, and humidity and
precipitation. |
This standard is addressed throughout the Ocean,
Atmosphere, and Climate unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 4, students read ÒEffects of El Ni–o
Around the WorldÓ an article describing effects on local weather from this
disruption to global patterns. ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activities 2 and 3, and in Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, students read ÒThe Ocean in MotionÓ,
an article which describes how ocean currents move warm and cold water around
the globe, influencing regional climates. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students conduct an experiment about
the transfer of energy between air and water at different temperatures and
discuss how this relates to cold and warm ocean currentsÕ effect on regional
climates. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 3, students use a digital simulation to
compare energy transfer and air temperatures at two locations at the same
latitude, one near a cold ocean current and one near a warm ocean current. ¥ In Lesson 3.1, Activities 3 and 4, and Lesson 3.2, Activity 2, students read and discuss ÒThe Gulf
Stream: A Current That Helped Win a WarÓ an article which describes how
prevailing winds affect ocean currents (which in turn affect regional
climates). ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 3, students use a digital simulation to
investigate the effect of changing prevailing winds on ocean currents and
regional climates. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 4 and 6, students write an explanation
of how the El Ni–o phenomenon causes changes in New ZealandÕs weather, a
question they have investigated over the course of Chapters 1 ,2, and 3 of
the unit. |
SC.6.E.7.4 |
Differentiate and show interactions among the
geosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere. |
This standard is addressed in several units. For
example: ¥ In Geology on Mars, Lesson 1.1, Activity 4, students are introduced to EarthÕs
spheres, then they compare these spheres for the other rocky planets in our
Solar System. ¥ In Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate, Lesson 3.4, Activity 5, students analyze a set of Earth Sphere
Interaction Cards. Each card describes a scenario, and students discuss and
identify which of EarthÕs spheres (geosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere,
atmosphere, and biosphere) are involved in the scenarios (one of which is the
El Ni–o phenomenon). ¥ In Weather Patterns, Lesson 1.5, Activity 4, students discuss ways that
precipitation can affect various of EarthÕs spheres. |
SC.6.E.7.5 |
Explain how energy provided by the sun influences
global patterns of atmospheric movement and the temperature differences
between air, water, and land. |
This standard is addressed throughout the Ocean,
Atmosphere, and Climate unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.3, students discover that energy from sunlight is
first transferred to land or water on EarthÕs surface before being
transferred to the air, through an experiment (Activities 2 and 4) and use of
a digital simulation (Activity 3) ¥ In Lesson 1.4, Activity 2, students examine maps showing solar
energy and and average air temperature around the world to conclude that the
closer a location is to the equator, the more energy from sunlight reaches
it, and the warmer its air temperatures. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 5 (click NEXT to see part 2 of 2 of this
activity), students read ÒHow the Ocean Keeps Climates StableÓ an article
which compares the climates of Seattle and Minneapolis and explains how the
ocean works as a heat sink to moderate air temperatures. ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 4 (click NEXT to see part 2 of 2 of this
activity), students read ÒWhat Causes Prevailing Winds?Ó an article that
explains how temperature differences cause wind. |
SC.6.E.7.6 |
Differentiate between weather and climate. |
This standard is addressed in the Ocean, Atmosphere,
and Climate unit in Lesson 1.2. Students view a short documentary video called
ÒChasing El Ni–oÓ about climate scientists, then in Activity 2 they discuss
the definition of the term climate in relation to the term weather. |
SC.6.E.7.7 |
Investigate how natural disasters have affected
human life in Florida. |
This standard is addressed in the Weather Patterns
unit in Lesson 3.2, Activity 4. Each student reads a short description
of one natural disaster in FloridaÕs history. |
SC.6.E.7.8 |
Describe ways human beings protect themselves from
hazardous weather and sun exposure. |
This standard is addressed in the Weather Patterns
unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 4, after reading about natural disasters
in FloridaÕs history, and the class uses what they read to discuss possible
ways of protecting against natural disasters. The class also discusses the danger
of sun exposure and ways of protecting against it. |
SC.6.E.7.9 |
Describe how the composition and structure of the
atmosphere protects life and insulates the planet. |
This standard is addressed in the Ocean, Atmosphere,
and Climate unit in Lesson 1.4, Activity 4. Students read an article titled
ÒEarth's Atmosphere: An Invisible ShieldÓ which describes several ways that
EarthÕs atmosphere protects life on Earth. |
SC.6.N.1.1 |
Define a problem from the sixth- grade curriculum,
use appropriate reference materials to support scientific understanding, plan
and carry out scientific investigation of various types, such as systematic
observations or experiments, identify variables, collect and organize data,
interpret data in charts, tables, and graphics, analyze information, make
predictions, and defend conclusions. |
Every unit in Amplify Science is structured around
conducting investigations as well as gathering and analyzing evidence from
other sources to draw and defend conclusions about scientific principles as
well as specific phenomena. For example, in the Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate
unit, students are investigating what causes Christchurch, New Zealand to
have colder air temperatures than normal during El Ni–o years. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 3, students make predictions about how a
change to wind could affect air temperature, then test their predictions by
planning and conducting experiments using the Ocean Atmosphere and Climate
simulation, and gathering and analyzing the resulting data. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 2-6, students analyze a variety of
data, then discuss, plan, and write scientific explanations describing their
conclusions about the causes of the cold weather in Christchurch. |
SC.6.N.1.2 |
Explain why scientific investigations should be
replicable. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units. For
example: ¥ In the Plate Motion Engineering unit, Lessons 5 and 6, students carefully track the details of the tsunami warning systems
they test so that tests of successful designs can be replicated. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.2, Activity 3, the class conducts the same
investigation on two stream tables and discusses the importance of conducting
this investigation twice and the degree of variation that occurs even when
the same procedures are followed. |
SC.6.N.1.3 |
Explain the difference between an experiment and
other types of scientific investigation, and explain the relative benefits
and limitations of each. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units, in
which students generate, use and discuss evidence generated from different
types of investigation. For example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, the class conducts an experiment with
two stream tables, and discusses the value of experimental evidence. They
then discuss the nature of experiments and the distinction between
experiments and systematic observations. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.1, Activities 3 and 4, students read and discuss
ÒInvestigating Landforms on VenusÓ an article focused on how a real scientist
uses observations of a computer model to gather evidence about landforms on
Venus. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, students evaluate evidence
from an experiment with a physical model (water vs. wax flowing over a stream
table) and from the observation of photographs of Earth surface features. |
SC.6.N.1.4 |
Discuss, compare, and negotiate methods used,
results obtained, and explanations among groups of students conducting the
same investigation. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units. For
example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.2, Activity 3, the class conducts the same
investigation on two stream tables and discusses the importance of
replicating this investigation and the degree of variation that occurs even
when the same procedures are followed. |
SC.6.N.1.5 |
Recognize that science involves creativity, not just
in designing experiments, but also in creating explanations that fit
evidence. |
Students are exposed to many different examples of
scientists using creativity in their work. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 2.2, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss
ÒListening to EarthÓ an article which describes how a real scientist used
creativity to gather evidence about plate motion by recording the sound of
earthquakes. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activities 3 and 4, students read and discuss ÒA
Continental PuzzleÓ, an article which describes how Alfred Wegener used
creativity to generate an explanation of plate tectonics. Students also think creatively themselves as they
plan investigations and create explanations. For example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students use creativity to plan a
stream table investigation as a class. ¥ In the Weather Patterns unit, Lesson 4.3, Activity 2, students use creativity to generate
and describe explanations for weather damage to a wilderness education
center, based on several pieces of evidence. |
SC.6.N.2.1 |
Distinguish science from other activities involving
thought. |
Amplify Science units provide students with a strong
foundational understanding of how scientific knowledge is constructed and how
this differs from everyday thinking processes. One illustration of this is
the Argumentation Wall, which is introduced in Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 1.3, Activity 2, The wall contains visual
representations of the goals and structure of scientific arguments, and is
added to and referred to across the year. When the Argumentation Wall is
introduced, there is explicit discussion of the differences between
scientific knowledge and other kinds of knowledge. |
SC.6.N.2.2 |
Explain that scientific knowledge is durable because
it is open to change as new evidence or interpretations are encountered. |
Across multiple Amplify Science units, students
encounter this concept both in their own work and in reading about
scientists. For example: ¥ In the Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate unit, Lesson 1.5, Activity 3, students analyze new evidence about
the amount of energy from the sun and the sea surface temperature near
Christchurch New Zealand in normal and El Ni–o years, that causes students to
reject one claim and see the need for more evidence about another. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss ÒA
Continental PuzzleÓ, an article which describes how new evidence caused a
large change in scientistsÕ understanding of how the EarthÕs surface changes
over long time periods. |
SC.6.N.2.3 |
Recognize that scientists who make contributions to
scientific knowledge come from all kinds of backgrounds and possess varied
talents, interests, and goals. |
Across multiple Amplify Science units, students
encounter profiles of scientists of a wide variety of ethnic and racial
backgrounds, and of different ages and genders. The profiles highlight a
variety of goals, interests and manners of investigating. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 1.2, students watch a video called ÒMeet a PaleontologistÓ
that profiles the work of Dr. Jefferson Wilson, a Latino scientist who makes
inferences about EarthÕs past based on fossil evidence. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss ÒA
Continental PuzzleÓ, an article about a German scientist and his work in the
early 1900Õs to develop a revolutionary claim about EarthÕs changing surface. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 1.1, students watch a short documentary about, Dr.
Lauren Edgar, a young female scientist who compares observations of the
surface of Mars and Earth to make inferences about MarsÕ geologic past. |
SC.6.N.3.1 |
Recognize and explain that a scientific theory is a
well-supported and widely accepted explanation of nature and is not simply a
claim posed by an individual. Thus, the use of the term
theory in science is very different than how it is used in everyday life. |
This standard is addressed in the Plate Motion unit.
In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, the class discusses the theory of
plate tectonics, including how the term theory is used differently in science
and in everyday language. |
SC.6.N.3.2 |
Recognize and explain that a scientific law is a
description of a specific relationship under given conditions in the natural
world. Thus, scientific laws are different from societal laws. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units.
For example: ¥ In Plate Motion, Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students discuss the Law of
Superposition, and also discuss what a scientific law is and how it is
different from a societal law. In addition: In the Rock Transformations unit, students have a
number of experiences that support an understanding of the Laws of
Conservation of Matter, for example: ¥ Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, the article ÒThe Oldest Rock
Formations on EarthÓ describes the cycling of rock material ¥ Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, a classroom model of cycling of rock
material. |
SC.6.N.3.3 |
Give several examples of scientific laws. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units.
For example: ¥ In Plate Motion, Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students discuss the Law of
Superposition. In addition: In the Rock Transformations unit, students have a
number of experiences that support an understanding of the Laws of
Conservation of Matter, for example: ¥ Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, the article ÒThe Oldest Rock
Formations on EarthÓ describes the cycling of rock material. ¥ Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, a classroom model of cycling of rock
material. |
SC.6.N.3.4 |
Identify the role of models in the context of the
sixth grade science benchmarks. |
Throughout the Amplify Science program, students
experience the importance of a wide variety of models to scientific
investigation and communication. For example, in the Ocean, Atmosphere, and
Climate unit: ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 3 the simulation is introduced as a
scientific model and students conduct initial observations and exploration of
the sim. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 3, students use a digital Modeling Tool
to create a visual model showing how ocean currents affect regional climates. ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 3, students use a small container of
water as a physical model to investigate how prevailing winds affect ocean
current direction and speed. |
SC.7.E.6.1 |
Describe the layers of the solid Earth, including
the lithosphere, the hot convecting mantle, and the dense metallic liquid and
solid cores. |
This standard is addressed through, multiple
activities in the Plate Motion unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 3 (press NEXT to see parts 2 through 6 of
6), students read short descriptions and analyze cross-section diagrams of
deep drilling sites to learn about the nature of the outer lithosphere. ¥ In Lesson 1.3, the activity titled ÒRevealing EarthÕs Outer
LayerÓ. students view a video that shows a computer model of the outer
lithosphere. ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 3, students use a physical model to
understand the nature of the mantle. ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 5, students read ÒHow Do We Know What's
Inside Earth?Ó which describes all the layers of the solid Earth. |
SC.7.E.6.2 |
Identify the patterns within the rock cycle and
relate them to surface events (weathering and erosion) and sub-surface events
(plate tectonics and mountain building). |
This standard is the focus of much of the Rock
Transformations unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2, students use the simulation to explore
weathering at the surface and melting to form magma below ground. ¥ In Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss the
article ÒThe Oldest Rock Formations on EarthÓ describing many ways rock and
rock material can be transformed. ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 3, students complete the challenges in the simulation that
involve moving rock material and mountain building due to subduction, as well
as weathering and erosion. |
SC.7.E.6.3 |
Identify current methods for measuring the age of
Earth and its parts, including the law of superposition and radioactive
dating. |
This standard is covered in the Plate Motion unit: ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 5. Students read ÒSteno and the SharkÓ
which describes how observations of fossil shark teeth provided evidence
about the age of the Earth and its parts. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, the class debriefs the article and discusses
both the law of superposition and radioactive dating. |
SC.7.E.6.4 |
Explain and give examples of how physical evidence
supports scientific theories that Earth has evolved over geologic time due to
natural processes. |
This standard is a focus of the Plate Motion, and
Rock Transformations units and is also touched upon in the Ocean, Atmosphere
and Climate unit. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.1, the Activity titled ÒVideo: Plate Motion and GPSÓ,
students watch ÒPlate Motion and GPSÓ, a short documentary video about
measuring the rate of plate motion. In Activity 2 of this lesson, students
use data from a map, and use the simulation to calculate the distance
tectonic plates move over many millions of years. ¥ In the Rock Transformations unit, Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss the
article ÒThe Oldest Rock Formations on EarthÓ describing changes to rock
formations over billions of years. ¥ In the Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate unit, Lesson 4.1, Activity 2, students are introduced to a question
about regional climates during the late Carboniferous period and evidence
about differences in content arrangements, prevailing winds, and polar ice
between that time and now. |
SC.7.E.6.5 |
Explore the scientific theory of plate tectonics by
describing how the movement of Earth's crustal plates causes both slow and
rapid changes in Earth's surface, including volcanic eruptions, earthquakes,
and mountain building. |
This standard is a focus of the Plate Motion unit.
For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.4, Activity 2, students run tests in the simulation
to determine the relationship between earthquakes and plate motion. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 2, 3, and 4, students analyze evidence,
and write explanations for how fossils from the same land-dwelling species
came to be found in both South America and South Africa as plate motion
separated those continents over many millions of years. |
SC.7.E.6.6 |
Identify the impact that humans have had on Earth,
such as deforestation, urbanization, desertification, erosion, air and water
quality, changing the flow of water. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units. For
example: ¥ In the Rock Transformation unit, Lesson 3.4, Activity 4, students view a slide show and discuss
ways that human actions impact weathering and water flow. ¥ Over the first two chapters of the Weather Patterns
unit, students investigate how a new lake created by a human-made dam could
affect local precipitation patterns. This question is introduced in a video
in Lesson 1.2, the Activity titled Òintroducing the Mystery of
Galetown StormsÓ. |
SC.7.E.6.7 |
Recognize that heat flow and movement of material
within Earth causes earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and creates mountains
and ocean basins. |
This standard is addressed in the Plate Motion unit.
For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 5, students read ÒHow Do We Know What's
Inside Earth?Ó which describes convection within the mantle. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 3, students gather evidence from the
simulation about earthquakes, volcanoes, and landforms at different types of
plate boundaries. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 2, 3, and 4, students analyze evidence,
and write explanations for how fossils from the same land-dwelling species
came to be found in both South America and South Africa as plate motion
created an ocean basin those continents. |
SC.7.N.1.1 |
Define a problem from the seventh grade curriculum,
use appropriate reference materials to support scientific understanding, plan
and carry out scientific investigation of various types, such as systematic
observations or experiments, identify variables, collect and organize data,
interpret data in charts, tables, and graphics, analyze information, make
predictions, and defend conclusions. |
Every unit in Amplify Science is structured around
conducting investigations as well as gathering and analyzing evidence from
other sources to draw and defend conclusions about scientific principles as
well as specific phenomena. For example, in the Rock Transformations unit: ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 2 (press NEXT to see both parts 1 and 2
of 2), students define and discuss the problem they will investigate: what
caused a rock formation in the Great Plains and one in the Rocky Mountains to
have nearly identical composition. ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 3 ((press NEXT to see part 3 of 3),
students make systematic observations of rock samples and record data in a
table format. ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2, students plan and conduct tests in the
simulation to discover how sediment and magma can each be formed. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, students gather evidence from reference
materials about different ways rocks can form by reading the article ÒDevilÕs
TowerÓ. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 2 students analyze evidence presented
in graphical form (note: the copymaster for this activity can be viewed in
the Digital Resources for the Lesson). In Activity 3 they create visual
models, and in Activity 5 they defend their conclusions by writing scientific
arguments about the Great Plains/Rocky Mountains question. |
SC.7.N.1.2 |
Differentiate replication (by others) from
repetition (multiple trials). |
This standard is addressed across multiple units.
For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, Lessons 5 and 6, students carefully track the details of the tsunami warning systems
they test so that tests of successful designs can be replicated (see for example, Lesson 5, the Activity titled ÒTesting Warning System
DesignsÓ). ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.2, Activity 3, the class conducts the same
investigation on two stream tables and discusses the importance of conducting
this investigation twice and the degree of variation that occurs even when
the same procedures are followed (also see the Teacher Support note titled
ÒPedagogical Goals: Using the Same Setup for the Stream Tables:). |
SC.7.N.1.3 |
Distinguish between an experiment (which must
involve the identification and control of variables) and other forms of
scientific investigation and explain that not all scientific knowledge is
derived from experimentation. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units, in
which students generate, use and discuss evidence generated from different
types of investigation. For example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.1, Activities 3 and 4, students read and discuss
ÒInvestigating Landforms on VenusÓ an article focused on how a real scientist
uses observations of a computer model to gather evidence about landforms on
Venus. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, the class conducts an experiment with
two stream tables, and discusses the value of experimental evidence. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, students evaluate evidence
from an experiment with a physical model (water vs. wax flowing over a stream
table) and from the observation of photographs of Earth surface features. |
SC.7.N.1.4 |
Identify test variables (independent variables) and
outcome variables (dependent variables) in an experiment. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units when
students conduct experiments, for example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, the class plans and conducts an
experiment with two stream tables. They identify test and outcome variables. ¥ In the Weather Patterns unit, Lesson 3.1, Activity 3, students conduct experiments in the
simulation with the test variable of wind and the outcome variables of air
parcel final height and temperature, energy released, and amount of rain. |
SC.7.N.1.5 |
Describe the methods used in the pursuit of a
scientific explanation as seen in different fields of science such as
biology, geology, and physics. |
This standard is addressed in several units. For
example, in the Geology on Mars
unit: ¥ In Lesson 1.1 students watch the video ÒMeet a Planetary
GeologistÓ and discuss the importance in this field of making inferences
about other planets based on observations of Earth. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, the Activity titled "Reflecting on How
Scientists Use ModelsÓ, students discuss the ways geologists get evidence
from models, based on an article they have read about a real geologist using
a model and their own use of a physical model. |
SC.7.N.1.6 |
Explain that empirical evidence is the cumulative
body of observations of a natural phenomenon on which scientific explanations
are based. |
Every Amplify Science unit is structured around
students generating empirical evidence and analyzing this evidence as well as
other evidence in order to make explanations about scientific principles as
well as specific phenomena. For example, in the Rock Transformations unit,
students are investigating what caused a rock formation in the Great Plains
and one in the Rocky Mountains to have nearly identical composition. ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2, students plan and conduct tests in the
simulation to gather evidence about how sediment and magma can each be
formed. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, students gather evidence about
different ways rocks can form by reading the article ÒDevilÕs TowerÓ. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activities 2, 3, and 5 students analyze evidence
about plate motion in the regions, create visual models, and write scientific
explanations about the Great Plains/Rocky Mountains question. |
SC.7.N.1.7 |
Explain that scientific knowledge is the result of a
great deal of debate and confirmation within the science community. |
In several Amplify Science units, students read
examples of debates and confirmation in the science community. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activity 5. Students read ÒSteno and the SharkÓ
which describes how observations of fossil shark teeth provided evidence
about the age of the Earth and its parts. ¥ In the Plate
Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activities 3 and 4 students read and discuss ÒA
Continental PuzzleÓ, an article which describes how new evidence caused a
large change in scientistsÕ understanding of how the EarthÕs surface changes
over long time periods. ¥ In the Geology
on Mars unit, Lesson 3.4, Activity 4, students read the article ÒCanals on
MarsÓ which describes debates between scientists about the origin of surface
features on Mars (press NEXT to see part 2 of 2 of this activity). In addition, during Chapter Four of each Amplify
Science unit, students engage in scientific argumentation around a question
for which there is compelling evidence to support multiple competing claims,
and in which students are supported to disagree productively. For example: ¥ In the Rock Transformations unit, Chapter Four
(e.g., Lesson 4.3, Activity 2) students engage in argumentation about
which types of rock formation is predominant on Venus, with some evidence
pointing toward the formation of sedimentary rocks, and some toward the
formation of igneous rocks. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Chapter Four, (e.g., Lesson 4.2, Activity 3) students engage in argumentation about
what best explains the pattern of volcanic activity and earthquakes on the
Jalisco Block, with some evidence pointing toward convergent plate motion,
and some pointing toward divergent plate motion. |
SC.7.N.2.1 |
Identify an instance from the history of science in
which scientific knowledge has changed when new evidence or new interpretations
are encountered. |
Across multiple Amplify Science units, students
encounter this concept both in their own work and in reading about
scientists. For example: ¥ In the Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate unit, Lesson 1.5, Activity 3, students analyze new evidence about
the amount of energy from the sun and the sea surface temperature near
Christchurch New Zealand in normal and El Ni–o years, that causes students to
reject one claim and see the need for more evidence about another (press NEXT
to see part 2 of 2 of this activity). ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.2, Activities 3 and 4, students read and discuss ÒA
Continental PuzzleÓ, an article which describes how new evidence caused a
large change in scientistsÕ understanding of how the EarthÕs surface changes
over long time periods. |
SC.7.N.3.1 |
Recognize and explain the difference between
theories and laws and give several examples of scientific theories and the
evidence that supports them. |
This standard is addressed in the Plate Motion and
Rock Transformations units. ¥ In Plate Motion Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, the class discusses the theory of
plate tectonics, including how the term theory is used differently in science
and in everyday language. They also discuss the difference between a theory
and a law, and consider other theories that they may be familiar with, such
as the theory of evolution and cell theory. In the Rock Transformations unit, students have a
number of experiences that support an understanding of the Laws of
Conservation of Matter, for example: ¥ Lesson 3.1, Activities 2 and 3, the article ÒThe Oldest Rock
Formations on EarthÓ describes the cycling of rock material ¥ Lesson 3.3, Activity 3, a classroom model of cycling of rock
material. Other exposures to scientific laws occur in Physical
Science courses, a domain in which scientific laws are more prevalent. |
SC.7.N.3.2 |
Identify the benefits and limitations of the use of
scientific models. |
This standard is addressed in all Amplify Science
units. For example, in the Plate Motion unit investigate plate motion using a
variety of models, including a physical model using putty and a plastic cube
(Lesson 2.1, Activity 3) a digital simulation (e.g., Lesson 2.4, Activity 3), and a physical model using towels (Lesson 2.3, Activity 3), and recognizing differences between
each model. |
SC.8.E.5.1 |
Recognize that there are enormous distances between
objects in space and apply our knowledge of light and space travel to
understand this distance. |
This standard is addressed in several units. For
example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 4.3, Activity 2, students are introduced to light
years, then calculate the time it would take to travel by spacecraft to other
stars. ¥ In the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit in Lesson 1.2, Activity 4, students read ÒThe Solar System is HugeÓ, an article
that describes objects in our solar systemÑhow big they are, how far away
they are, and what it would take for humans to visit them. |
SC.8.E.5.2 |
Recognize that the universe contains many billions
of galaxies and that each galaxy contains many billions of stars. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, for example: ¥ In Lesson 4.2, Activity 2, students analyze an image of the night
sky to estimate the number of stars in the Milky Way, and in Activity 3, they
analyze the Hubble Deep Field Image to estimate the number of galaxies in the
Universe. ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 3, students critique a physical model of
the Milky Way in which grains of salt represent stars. |
SC.8.E.5.3 |
Distinguish the hierarchical relationships between
planets and other astronomical bodies relative to solar system, galaxy, and
universe, including distance, size, and composition. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, for example: ¥ In Lesson 1.1, Activity 2, students analyze data about objects in
our Solar System. ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 2, students are introduced to light
years, then calculate the time it would take to travel by spacecraft to other
stars. ¥ In Lesson 4.2, Activity 3, they observe the Hubble Deep Field
Image and learn that galaxies are composed of billions of stars. |
SC.8.E.5.4 |
Explore the Law of Universal Gravitation by
explaining the role that gravity plays in the formation of planets, stars, and
solar systems and in determining their motions. |
This standard is addressed in the Earth, Moon, and
Sun unit in Lesson 2.4, Activity 5. Students read the article
"Gravity in the Solar System" which discusses how the force of
gravity helped form the solar system and continues to hold the solar system
together as objects travel in their orbits. |
SC.8.E.5.5 |
Describe and classify specific physical properties
of stars: apparent magnitude (brightness), temperature (color), size, and
luminosity (absolute brightness). |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, for example: ¥ In Lesson 4.1, Activity 3, students analyze a set of Star Cards
and classify stars based on data about each star. ¥ In Lesson 4.6, Activity 2, students analyze data about several
stars in order to create scientific arguments about the starsÕ exoplanets. (Note: the Star Cards are printed and included in
the unit kit. They can also be viewed in the Resource: Print Materials:
8.5x11 document found with the unit overview. Stars include: Alpha Centauri
A, 51-Pegasi, Nu2 Lupi, Rigel A, Zeta Pupis, TRAPPIST-1, Kepler 438, BarnardÕs
Star, Aldebaran, Wolf 1061, EPIC 201367065. Data presented about each star
includes color, temperature, diameter, luminosity, sunspots, solar ares, and
prominences; distance from Earth; and known planets) |
SC.8.E.5.6 |
Create models of solar properties including:
rotation, structure of the Sun, convection, sunspots, solar flares, and
prominences. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 4.1, Activity 3, students analyze a set of Star Cards
with data about solar properties. They identify commonalities across the
stars in order to create a mental model of the properties that all or most
stars have in common. ¥ In Lesson 4.5, Activity 3, students create a physical model of
stars with different temperature properties. |
SC.8.E.5.7 |
Compare and contrast the properties of objects in
the Solar System including the Sun, planets, and moons to those of Earth,
such as gravitational force, distance from the Sun, speed, movement, temperature,
and atmospheric conditions. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, Lesson 1.1, Activity 2. Students analyze data about objects in
our Solar System using a set of Solar System Object cards (Note: the Solar
System cards are printed and include in the unit kit. They can also be viewed
in the Resource: Print Materials: 8.5x11 document found with the unit
overview). The objects presented in the Solar System cards are:
¥ The sun ¥ Planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,
Neptune, Uranus ¥ Pluto (a dwarf planet) ¥ Moons: EarthÕs Moon, Titan, Io, Europa ¥ RosettaÕs comet ¥ 4 Vesta (an asteroid) Data about each object presented on the card
includes diameter, composition, surface temperature, surface gravity,
movement, atmosphere and distance from the sun. |
SC.8.E.5.8 |
Compare various historical models of the Solar
System, including geocentric and heliocentric. |
This standard is addressed in the Earth, Moon, and
Sun unit, Lesson 1.4, Activity 5. Students read ÒCosmic ModelsÓ which
describes how ideas about the Solar System have changed as people discovered
new evidence. |
SC.8.E.5.9 |
Explain the impact of objects in space on each other
including: the Sun on the Earth including seasons and gravitational
attraction the Moon on the Earth, including phases, tides, and eclipses, and
the relative position of each body. |
This standard is addressed throughout the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit. For
example: ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, students use a physical model to
gather evidence about the cause of changing moon phases. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students gather evidence about the
cause of lunar eclipses from a digital simulation. ¥ In Lesson 2.6, Activity 4, students read ÒTides and the MoonÓ
about the cause of tides. ¥ In Lesson 3.1, Activity 5 (press NEXT to see part 2 of 2 of this
activity), students read ÒThe Endless Summer of the Arctic TernÓ about the
causes of seasons. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 5, students read the article
"Gravity in the Solar System" which discusses how the force of
gravity helped form the solar system and continues to hold the solar system
together as objects travel in their orbits. |
SC.8.E.5.10 |
Assess how technology is essential to science for
such purposes as access to outer space and other remote locations, sample
collection, measurement, data collection and storage, computation, and
communication of information. |
This standard is addressed across several units. For
example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 3.4, students watch a documentary video called ÒRover
on MarsÓ which describes a scientistÕs investigations that rely on
technology. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 4.4, Activities 2 and 3, students read and discuss
ÒUsing Starlight to Investigate ExoplanetsÓ, which describes the use of
technology to detect different types of light as evidence about stars and
planets. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 3.1, students watch a documentary video called ÒPlate
Motion and GPSÓ which describes the use GPS technology to study the movement
of tectonic plates. ¥ In the Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate unit, Lesson 1.2, students watch a documentary video called ÒChasing
El Ni–oÓ which describes technology for data collection, computer modeling,
and communication. |
SC.8.E.5.11 |
Identify and compare characteristics of the
electromagnetic spectrum such as wavelength, frequency, use, and hazards and
recognize its application to an understanding of planetary images and
satellite photographs. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, Lesson 4.4, Activities 2 and 3. Students read and discuss
ÒUsing Starlight to Investigate ExoplanetsÓ, which describes how scientists
detect different types of light as a way to gather evidence about stars and
planets. |
SC.8.E.5.12 |
Summarize the effects of space exploration on the
economy and culture of Florida. |
This standard is addressed in the Geology on Mars
unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 4, when students read ÒHow Space Flight
Has Shaped FloridaÓ. |
SC.8.N.1.1 |
Define a problem from the eighth-grade curriculum
using appropriate reference materials to support scientific understanding,
plan and carry out scientific investigations of various types, such as
systematic observations or experiments, identify variables, collect and
organize data, interpret data in charts, tables, and graphics, analyze
information, make predictions, and defend conclusions. |
Every unit in Amplify Science is structured around
conducting investigations as well as gathering and analyzing evidence from
other sources to draw and defend conclusions about scientific principles as
well as specific phenomena. For example, in the Geology on Mars unit, students
are investigating what created a particular channel on the surface of Mars. ¥ In Lesson 1.1, Activities 2 and 4, students use reference
materials, the Solar System Cards and Rocky Planet Cards, to support their
understanding of the context of their investigation. ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activities 2 and 4, students make systematic
observations and comparisons of surface features on Mars and Earth. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students plan, make predictions about,
and conduct an experiment using a stream table to gather additional evidence. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2, students write a scientific argument,
based on several types of evidence, in which they defend their conclusions
about the process that formed the channel. |
SC.8.N.1.2 |
Design and conduct a study using repeated trials and
replication. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units.
For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, Lessons 5 and 6, students carefully track the details of the tsunami warning systems
they test so that tests of successful designs can be replicated. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.2, Activity 3, the class conducts the same
investigation on two stream tables and discusses the importance of conducting
this investigation twice and the degree of variation that occurs even when
the same procedures are followed. |
SC.8.N.1.3 |
Use phrases such as "results support" or
"fail to support" in science, understanding that science does not
offer conclusive 'proof' of a knowledge claim. |
In every unit in Amplify Science, students are
supported in using the language of scientific argumentation. For example ¥ In the Geology
on Mars unit, Lesson 1.3, in Activity 2, students are introduced to the
Argumentation WallÓ. The wall contains visual representations of the goals
and structure of scientific arguments, and is added to and referred to across
the year. ¥ In every core unit, in Chapter 4, students
participate in a Science Seminar in which they engage in oral and written
argumentation. Students are provided with Argumentation Sentence Starters
such as Ôthe evidence that supports my claim isÉÕ (see Earth, Moon, and Sun, Lesson 4.2, Activity 2 for an example). |
SC.8.N.1.4 |
Explain how hypotheses are valuable if they lead to
further investigations, even if they turn out not to be supported by the
data. |
Across Amplify Science, students are exposed to the
idea that scientists make claims based on evidence and revise those claims
when needed, in the face of new evidence. Students experience this both in
their own scientific investigations and in reading about professional
scientists. For example: ¥ In Earth,
Moon, and Sun, Lesson 1.4, Activity 5, students read an article, ÒCosmic
ModelsÓ that describes several inaccurate hypotheses about the Solar System
then led to further investigations. The teacher explicitly introduces the
idea that these ideas were valuable even though they turned out to be
inaccurate ¥ In Weather Patterns, Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students revise their models based on
new evidence (the models were originally created in Lesson 1.6, Activity 4). |
SC.8.N.1.5 |
Analyze the methods used to develop a scientific
explanation as seen in different fields of science. |
In every Amplify Science unit, students are exposed
to scientists using different methods to develop scientific explanations, and
also use different methods in their own investigations. For example: ¥ Students conduct systematic observations of a physical models in Earth, Moon, and
Sun, Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, and of photographs in Geology on Mars Lesson 1.2, Activities 3 and 4. ¥ Students conduct controlled experiments in Weather Patterns, Lesson 3.1, Activity 3, using the Weather Patterns simulation. ¥ Students read and discuss ÒListening to EarthÓ about
how a scientist makes explanations about difficult to observe processes based
on measurements in Plate Motion Lesson 2.2, Activities 2 and 3. ¥ Students view a video about scientists making computer models based on a
variety of measurements in Ocean,
Atmosphere, and Climate, Lesson 1.2, the activity titled ÒChasing El Ni–oÓ. |
SC.8.N.1.6 |
Understand that scientific investigations involve
the collection of relevant empirical evidence, the use of logical reasoning,
and the application of imagination in devising hypotheses, predictions,
explanations and models to make sense of the collected evidence. |
Every unit in Amplify Science is structured around a
driving question which students answer by gathering evidence, using reasoning
to construct arguments, and making explanations and models. For example, in
the Geology on Mars unit, students are investigating what created a
particular channel on the surface of Mars. ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activities 2 and 4, students make systematic
observations and comparisons of surface features on Mars and Earth. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students plan, make predictions about,
and conduct an experiment using a stream table to gather additional evidence. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students use a graphic organizer
called the Reasoning Tool to organize their evidence ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2, students write a scientific argument,
based on several types of evidence, in which they defend their conclusions
about the process that formed the channel. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 3, the class reflects on what they have
done and how that demonstrates what is involved in scientific investigations |
SC.8.N.2.1 |
Distinguish between scientific and pseudoscientific
ideas. |
Students are supported in their understanding of the
distinction between scientific and pseudoscientific ideas through a continual
emphasis on the nature of scientific knowledge as constructed based on
empirical evidence and revised through the collaboration of the scientific
community. For example, in the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 1.3, Activity 2, ÒIntroducing ArgumentationÓ, students
are introduced to the Argumentation Wall. The wall contains visual
representations of the goals and structure of scientific arguments, and is
added to and referred to across the year. |
SC.8.N.2.2 |
Discuss what characterizes science and its methods. |
Students are supported in their understanding of
what characterizes science and its methods through a continual emphasis on
the nature of scientific knowledge as constructed based on empirical evidence
and revised through the collaboration of the scientific community. For
example: ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, students discuss different
investigation methods in science. ¥ In the Geology on Mars unit, Lesson 1.3, Activity 2, ÒIntroducing ArgumentationÓ, students
are introduced to the Argumentation Wall. The wall contains visual
representations of the goals and structure of scientific arguments, and is
added to and referred to across the year. |
SC.8.N.3.1 |
Select models useful in relating the results of
their own investigations. |
In every Amplify science unit, students both use a
variety of models and create or select their own models to explain the
results of their investigations. For example: ¥ In the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit, Lesson 3.3, Activity 4, students create a model to show their
explanation, based on their investigations, of the cause of when and how
lunar eclipses occur. ¥ In the Rock Transformations unit, Lesson 3.4, Activity 3 students create a model to show their
explanation, based on their investigations, of the rock transformations that
led to rocks of very similar composition occurring in the Rocky Mountains and
Great Plains. |
SC.8.N.3.2 |
Explain why theories may be modified but are rarely
discarded. |
Students understanding of this idea is supported by
discussions of how claims in science, including theories, are constructed and
modified. For example: ¥ In Earth, Moon, and Sun, Lesson 1.4, Activity 5, students read an article, ÒCosmic
ModelsÓ that describes progress made at different points in the development
of an accurate understanding of the Solar System. See the Teacher Support
tab, the note titled ÒInstructional Suggestion: Nature of Science: Discussing
How Theories ChangeÓ. ¥ In Plate
Motion, Lesson 3.3, Activity 2,, the class discusses the theory of plate tectonics,
including how the term theory is used differently in science and in everyday
language. |
SC.8.N.4.1 |
Explain that science is one of the processes that
can be used to inform decision making at the community, state, national, and
international levels. |
Students get experience with how science can be used
in decision-making process in several units. For example: ¥ In Weather Patterns, Lesson 1.2, students view a video ÒBig Storms in GaletownÓ
that introduces a scenario in which scientists must advise local lawmakers
about the possible causes of large storms, and whether they might be related
to a new artificial lake. ¥ In Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate, Lesson 1.2, Activity 2, students are introduced to a scenario
in which scientists must advise the New Zealand Farm Council about the causes
of periodic disruptions to regional weather patterns. ¥ In Plate Motion Engineering Internship, students are
introduced to context in which scientific research on plate motion and
tsunamis supports the development of warning systems to save lives (see Lesson 1, ÒIntroducing FuturaÓ where the scenario is
introduced). |
SC.8.N.4.2 |
Explain how political, social, and economic concerns
can affect science, and vice versa. |
Students see how political, social, and economic
concerns can affect science, and vice versa, across multiple units in the
Earth Science Course. For example: ¥ In Plate Motion Engineering Internship, students are
introduced to context in which scientific research on plate motion and
tsunamis supports the development of warning systems to save lives (see Lesson 1, ÒIntroducing FuturaÓ where the scenario is
introduced). ¥ In Plate Motion Engineering Internship, Lesson 1, ÒIntroducing FuturaÓ, students learn that economic
and social concerns make limiting long-term costs and limiting false alarms
important criteria in designing tsunami warning systems. ¥ In Weather Patterns, Lesson 1.2, students view a video ÒBig Storms in GaletownÓ
that introduces a scenario in which scientific research will affect political
decisions about a new artificial lake. ¥ In Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate, Lesson 3.1, Activities 3 and 4, students read and discuss ÒThe
Gulf Stream, a Current that Helped Win a WarÓ which describes how early
scientific understanding of the Gulf Stream current helped the United States
economically and politically. |
LAFS.6.SL.1.1 |
Engage effectively in a range of collaborative
discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on
grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others ideas and expressing
their own clearly. Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied
required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to
evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under
discussion. Follow rules for collegial discussions, set specific goals and
deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. Pose and respond to
specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that
contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion. Review the key
ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives
through reflection and paraphrasing. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the
Advanced Earth/Space Science Course. Students discuss their thinking in
virtually every lesson, for a wide variety of purposes. Some examples, across
one unit, are: In the Rock Transformations unit, students discuss every day, with small, medium and large
groups. ¥ In Lesson 1.5, Activity 3, student discuss evidence about how
rocks form, first in pairs then as a class. ¥ In Lesson 2.4, Activity 2, students participate in the small group discourse
routine, Write and Share, where each student in a group receives a unique
data source, write about it then share what they learned with their group so
that all members can learn something new from the others. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activities 2 and 3, students play a rock
transformations game and discuss each transformation as they work together.
In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2, students again use the Write and Share
discourse routine to share thinking about rock transformations and plate
movement. ¥ In Lessons 4.1 and 4.2 student pairs discuss claims and evidence focused on understanding
which rock transformations might be happening on Venus, and in Lesson 4.3 students participate in an whole-class discussion
called the Science Seminar where they work together to discuss the claims and
evidence about the rock transformations on Venus, and must use the specific
evidence they evaluated, along with all the content from the unit to evaluate
and eventually decide what they think is happening on Venus. The Science
Seminar in particular provides students with many opportunities to pose
questions that elicit elaboration from others, and respond to othersÕ
questions and comments with relevant ideas. It also provides students with a
time to acknowledge information presented by others and to modify their own
views as needed. |
LAFS.6.SL.1.2 |
Interpret information presented in diverse media and
formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how it
contributes to a topic, text, or issue under study. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2 of the Earth, Moon and Sun unit,
students participate in the small group discourse routine, Write and Share.
In this activity one student evaluates evidence offered from the Earth, Moon
and Sun simulation, one student evaluates evidence from an article they all
read in a previous lesson, and another evaluates evidence from a model.
During the discussion, students share what they learned from each source, and
discuss what kind of evidence each unique format has to offer. They use all
three sources to answer questions from the unit. ¥ In Lesson 4.1 Activity 3, of the Plate Motion unit, students
receive evidence from a variety of sources about a rift that is occurring
near several plate boundaries in Mexico. They discuss each source, evaluating
them and making conclusions about the information presented on each, then use
this information to sort the cards according to which claim each card
supports. As they sort the evidence cards they work together and discuss with
a partner why they think each card helps to explain something about why the
rift is occurring. In Lesson 4.2 they revisit this evidence and discuss it in the
whole-class discourse routine, the Science Seminar. |
LAFS.6.SL.1.3 |
Delineate a speakerÕs argument and specific claims,
distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims
that are not. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. Most units end with a curricular sequence
called the Science Seminar Sequence. This 3-day series of lessons asks
students to use content derived throughout the unit and apply it to
understanding a new context. Students are presented with competing claims and
evidence, then prepare for a whole-class discussion of this evidence. The
following offer examples of students discussing claims and evidence and using
reasoning: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 2 of Weather Patterns students, in a
whole-class group format, discuss claims about what kind of rainstorm (or
rainstorms) destroyed a remote environmental center (e.g. one large storm or
several medium ones), and use evidence and reasoning to determine which
scenario best explains what happened there. During the discussion, students
evaluate which evidence is relevant and irrelevant to each claim and evaluate
the soundness of the reasoning that each participant offers. |
LAFS.6.SL.2.4 |
Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas
logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate
main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear
pronunciation. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. Most units end with a curricular sequence
called the Science Seminar Sequence, which asks students to apply what they
have learned to a new context. Students are presented with competing claims
and evidence, then prepare for a whole-class discussion of this evidence. The
following offer examples of students coming prepared to discuss a specific,
content-specific topic: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, in the Activity titled ÔIntroducing the Science
SeminarÕ from the Rock Transformations unit, the class reviews the important
social attributes needed to participate effectively in scientific
argumentation. In Activity 2 students discuss claims about what kinds of rock
transformations might be happening on the surface of Venus. Students use
evidence that they have analyzed and discussed during the previous two
lessons in order to hold this whole class discussion. ¥ In Lesson 4.3, in the Activity titled ÔIntroducing the Science
SeminarÕ from the Weather Patterns unit, the class reviews the important
social attributes needed to participate effectively in scientific
argumentation. In Activity 2, students discuss claims about what kind of
rainstorm (or rainstorms) destroyed a remote environmental center (one large
storm or several medium ones). during the whole-class discussion students use
evidence that they have examined during the previous two lessons to support
their thinking. |
LAFS.6.SL.2.5 |
Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics,
images, music, sound) and visual displays in presentations to clarify
information. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 4 in the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit (see
the Teacher Support note titled Instructional Suggestion: Literacy Note:
Additional Modalities for Sharing Arguments) students are presented with
presentation options for their final argument, including a multimedia
presentation or video. ¥ In Lesson 4.2 of the Ocean, Atmosphere and Currents unit,
Activity 3, students participate in a whole-class Science Seminar discussion.
The evidence under discussion comes from several diagrams, maps and other visuals
that students have analyzed in Lesson 4.1 and, throughout the discussion in the Science
Seminar these visuals are projected so that students can reference and
discuss them throughout. ¥ In Lesson 1.4, Activity 2 of Earth, Moon and Sun unit, student
pairs participate in an activity where they collect data from the Earth Moon
and Sun simulation. During this activity pairs are directed to discuss their
observations and the data they collect, and to then apply this information to
answer the Investigation Question, ÒWhy is part of the moon dark?Ó Students refer to the simulation as
they work together to discuss and answer the Investigation Question, and to
continually clarify their understanding as they participate in the activity. |
LAFS.68.RST.1.1 |
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis
of science and technical texts. |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course. Students read articles multiple times, for different
purposes, in order to gather textual evidence to support science ideas. For
example: ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2 of the Weather Patterns unit, students
read the article, ÒDisaster in California!Ó Students are encouraged to actively
read and analyze the text by making annotations, noting questions they have
and connections they are making as they read. During Activity 3, students
discuss their annotations with a partner, then with the whole class. The
reading coupled with this text-based discussion helps students to better
understand important content related to temperature and energy, the
relationship between these and how far cloud might rise into the troposphere,
and what this means for the size of a storm. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2 of the Plate Motion unit, students
re-read a section of the same article, ÒListening to the EarthÓ that they
read during the previous lesson. The purpose of the re-reading they do in
this lesson is to solidify an understanding of how plates at different kinds
of boundaries move, how plates and the mantle interact at each type of
boundary, and what landforms are commonly found at each type of boundary.
Students then use this information, collected from two different readings of
the same article, to support the creation of physical models in Activity 3. |
LAFS.68.RST.1.2 |
Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a
text; provide an accurate summary of the text distinct from prior knowledge
or opinions. |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course. Students read articles multiple times and apply the strategy
of summarizing often. In addition, for every Ôsecond readÕ students are asked
questions that help them to summarize the important ideas from the text. For
example: ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2 of the Geology on Mars unit, students
re-read a section of the article, ÒInvestigation Landforms on VenusÓ in order
to better understand how earth scientists use evidence from landforms to
describe the history of a rocky planet, and how models can provide evidence
about surface formations and geologic activity on a planet that is too far
away to directly study. Students highlight and note important information as
they read, then respond to questions that help them to use evidence from the
text to summarize what they learned from reading. In addition, students then
participate in a whole class discussion where they use information from the
text to orally summarize important information from the text. |
LAFS.68.RST.1.3 |
Follow precisely a multistep procedure when carrying
out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks. |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.3., Activity 3 of the Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate
unit, students use the Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate simulation to make
observations and collect data about the air temperature in two different
locations on Earth: one near a warm current and one near a cold current.
Students must follow a multistep procedure in order to collect the necessary
data for this activity. |
LAFS.68.RST.2.4 |
Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and
other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific
scientific or technical context relevant to grades 68 texts and topics. |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 3 of the Weather Patterns unit, students
read, annotate and analyze evidence cards. Each card contains text and
various symbols along with either graphs, maps or tables containing data.
Students must carefully read all available information in order to make
meaning from these cards.
¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 2 of the Rock Transformations unit,
students read the article, ÒDevils TowerÓ The article contains both
traditional text as well a time-sequence diagram that is essential for
understanding the content in the article. In order to analyze the diagram,
students have to determine the meaning of the associated symbols and
domain-specific vocabulary. |
LAFS.68.RST.2.5 |
Analyze the structure an author uses to organize a
text, including how the major sections contribute to the whole and to an understanding
of the topic. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 2.2, Activity 2 (see the Teacher Support tab, note
titled ÒInstructional Suggestion: Literacy Note: Text Structure) students are
introduced to the idea of different text structures and discuss the text
structure that best applies to the ÒListening to EarthÓ article. ¥ In Lesson 1, during the activity titled, ÒIntroducing FuturalÓ
for the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, students learn what their
role is (as geohazard engineering interns) and discuss that this role means
for the unit; they are also introduced to other characters and roles that
they will encounter in the unit (for example, project director and internship
director -- the teacher). In Lesson 2 during the Reading about Earthquakes and Tsunamis
activity, students are introduced to the engineering dossier that will guide
many activities in their internship and learn what a dossier is (a term
professionals use for a set of related documents). The teacher explains that
students will be reading from and adding to the dossier throughout the unit.
Over the next 8 lessons students read different portions of the dossier and
are encouraged to consider the formal tone as well as the structure and
organization of the text. |
LAFS.68.RST.2.6 |
Analyze the authors purpose in providing an
explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.2, during Activity 2 of the Geology on Mars unit,
students re-read a portion of the article ÒInvestigating Landforms on VenusÓ
which is about the work that one scientist does with models as part of his
work studying Venus. Before reading the class discusses the scientistÕs work
and why and how he uses models as part of that work as well as why this article,
written for this unit, is important for inclusion in the unit. As they read
they continue to consider the purposes and usefulness of this work and
connect this to other content in the unit; students spend time after reading
considering these questions as well. ¥ In Lesson 1, in the Activity titled ÒIntroducing FuturaÓ for
the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, the teacher explains the
various roles students (and the teacher) will take on during the Engineering
Internship. In each lesson that follows, students repeatedly read texts from
different participants in the internship and consider the role each
participant plays and how this affects the ways they should read associated
texts that are provided in the unit. |
LAFS.68.RST.3.7 |
Integrate quantitative or technical information
expressed in words in a text with a version of that information expressed
visually (e.g., in a flowchart, diagram, model, graph, or table). |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course, during standard reading lessons, as well as when students
read evidence cards and participate in using a simulation that has textual
elements such as symbols, graphs and standard text. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2 of the Weather Patterns unit, students re-read a section
of the article ÒDisaster in California!Ó focusing on understanding how
energy, temperature and the height of a cloud reaches in the troposphere are
related to how much rainfall a storm provides. In Activity 3, students apply
this understanding to an activity in the Weather Patterns simulation, where
they simulate different sizes of rainstorms and make observations and collect
data about which of these factors affect the amount of rainfall in each storm
they model. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2 of the Earth, Moon and Sun unit,
students gather evidence from the Earth, Moon and Sun simulation about the
conditions for an eclipse to happen. While conducting each trial on the
simulation students need to read and understand the diagrams that are used,
and they also need to be able to read and understand the data that is
provided for each run of the simulation. Next, in Activity 3, students
re-read the article, ÒAn Ancient Machine for Predicting EclipsesÓ and
continue to gather evidence about eclipses. Both sources provide evidence for
students to use as they create models of eclipses in Activity 3. |
LAFS.68.RST.3.8 |
Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment based on
research findings, and speculation in a text. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 3 of the Plate Motion unit, students read
the article ÒA Continental PuzzleÓ which focuses on Alfred Wegener, who first
proposed the theory that continents on EarthÕs surface had moved over long
periods of time, and the evidence he used to come up with this theory. The
article takes an historical perspective and presents facts, reasoning and
speculation that people have put forth over the last 150 years since WegenerÕs
theory has become accepted. While reading in Activity 2, discussing what they
read with others in Activity 3, and re-reading again in Lesson 3.3, Activity 2, students confront facts, reasoned
judgment and speculation in order to understand what current thinking about
this topic is today. |
LAFS.68.RST.3.9 |
Compare and contrast the information gained from
experiments, simulations, video, or multimedia sources with that gained from
reading a text on the same topic. |
This standard is addressed in every unit of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2 of the Earth, Moon and Sun unit,
students gather evidence from the Earth, Moon and Sun simulation about the
conditions necessary for a lunar eclipse to happen. Next, in Activity 3,
students re-read the article, ÒAn Ancient Machine for Predicting EclipsesÓ
and continue to gather evidence about eclipses, comparing and contrasting the
evidence from each source. Both sources provide evidence for students to use
as they create models of eclipses in Activity 3. ¥ In Lesson 1.5, Activity 2 of the Weather Patterns unit, students
re-read a portion of the article ÒWhat are Clouds?Ó to better understand how
clouds form and how energy plays a role in this. Next, in Activity 3,
students use information from the reading to guide them as they use the
Weather Patterns simulation to create clouds with varying amounts of rainfall
and energy. |
LAFS.68.WHST.1.1 |
Write arguments focused on discipline-specific
content. Introduce claim(s) about a topic or issue, acknowledge and
distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the
reasons and evidence logically. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and
relevant, accurate data and evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the
topic or text, using credible sources. Use words, phrases, and clauses to
create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims,
reasons, and evidence. Establish and maintain a formal style. Provide a
concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument
presented. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 4 in the Earth, Moon and Sun unit,
students write arguments to address the question, ÒDuring a year, will there
be a lunar eclipse of the moon of Kepler-47c?Ó Kepler-47c is an actual planet
that orbits two stars. Students write arguments based on evidence that they
examine in the previous two lessons, as well as content knowledge they have
gained throughout the unit; the writing activity is constructed so that
studentsÕ arguments can contain content from the entire unit. ¥ During Lessons 4.1 (for example, Activity 3) and 4.2 (for example, Activity 3) of the Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate unit,
students consider evidence and claims about whether the average air
temperature in an area of South China during the Carboniferous period was the
same, warmer or cooler than it is today.
In order to analyze the evidence, students use the content knowledge
they have gained throughout the unit about climate, temperature, ocean
currents, energy and the atmosphere. In Lesson 4.3 students write arguments that address the question
about air temperature during the Carboniferous period that they have been
examining. This writing activity is constructed so that studentsÕ arguments
can contain content from the entire unit. |
LAFS.68.WHST.1.2 |
Write informative/explanatory texts, including the
narration of historical events, scientific procedures/ experiments, or
technical processes. Introduce a topic clearly, previewing what is to follow;
organize ideas, concepts, and information into broader categories as
appropriate to achieving purpose; include formatting (e.g., headings),
graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding
comprehension. Develop the topic with relevant, well-chosen facts,
definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples.
Use appropriate and varied transitions to create cohesion and clarify the
relationships among ideas and concepts. Use precise language and
domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Establish
and maintain a formal style and objective tone. Provide a concluding
statement or section that follows from and supports the information or
explanation presented. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 2 in the Plate Motion unit, students
begin to prepare to write final arguments by first choosing a claim they want
to support in writing. They then organize their thinking using a tool called
the Reasoning Tool. Next, students further organize their thinking by
examining what they have written on the Reasoning Tool and deciding which
evidence to include in their writing. All of these activities prepare
students to develop a topic with relevant, well-chosen facts. In the
instructions for writing their arguments, students are encouraged to directly
use the information from each evidence card to support their writing, as they
write their arguments in Activity 4. In addition, students are provided with
supportive scaffolds such as the Scientific Argument Sentence Starters, which
remind students ways to include transitions, clarify relationships among
ideas, and maintain cohesion during their writing. ¥ In Lesson 7, during the activity titled, ÔIntroducing the ProposalÓ
of the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, students discuss the rubric
that will use to design their proposals, so that they can observe and
understand the tone and construction of the arguments they will be writing;
the rubric also includes categories that describe the use of relevant, domain
specific vocabulary that should be included. Next, students create draft
outlines, which receive feedback about the content as well as overall writing
and vocabulary use, and in Lesson 8 they revise their proposals based on this feedback.
In addition, throughout Lessons 7, 8, and 9, students are reminded to establish and maintain a formal style and
objective tone in their proposal writing. |
LAFS.68.WHST.2.4 |
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the
development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and
audience. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lessons 7, 8, and 9 of the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, students are
introduced to the task of developing an Engineering Proposal that offers the
best tsunami warning system for Sri Lanka, based on criteria such as cost,
what kinds of earthquakes are detected and whether or not sufficient warning
is provided for people to react. Students develop, revise and organize their
written proposals during this series of lessons, and consider the style
(through examination of a rubric, and after receiving feedback about their
proposals) as well as audience (see, for example, Lesson 8, the activity titled ÒRevising Design DecisionsÓ). |
LAFS.68.WHST.2.5 |
With some guidance and support from peers and
adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising,
editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on how well purpose
and audience have been addressed. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. Most units in the Earth/Space Science course end with a 3-day
Science Seminar Sequence. This sequence provides time for students to examine
evidence about a novel scientific problem that requires them to use content
from the rest of the unit. Students discuss their ideas about this problem in
a discourse routine called the Science Seminar, then independently write
final arguments based on the thinking they did during the sequence. For
example: ¥ In Lesson 7, during the Activity titled, ÔIntroducing the
ProposalÓ of the Plate Motion Engineering Internship unit, students review
their role as engineering interns and consider the audience to whom they will
be addressing their proposals -- their project director. They are introduced
to the rubric that will be used to provide feedback about their proposals
and, through this, consider the component parts, tone, audience and specific
vocabulary needed to write an effective proposal. Next, students write draft
proposals, which receive feedback, and in the following two lessons, students
revise their proposals based on this feedback. ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 2 of the Earth, Moon and Sun unit,
students begin to prepare to write their final arguments. They first choose a
claim they want to support in their writing, then use a tool called the
Reasoning Tool to consider, analyze, and organize their evidence. In Activity
3, students further organize their thinking by examining what they have done
with the reasoning tool and deciding which evidence to include in their
writing. All of these activities prepare students to write their arguments in
Activity 4. In addition, as they write in Activity 4, students are provided
with supportive scaffolds such as Scientific Argumentation Sentence Starters
to support their use of appropriate language and tone. |
LAFS.68.WHST.2.6 |
Use technology, including the Internet, to produce
and publish writing and present the relationships between information and
ideas clearly and efficiently. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science Course. An example from one unit is: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 4 in the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit (see
the Teacher Support note titled Instructional Suggestion: Literacy Note:
Additional Modalities for Sharing Arguments) students are presented with
presentation options for their final argument, including publishing to a
class webpage or blog. ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2 in the Weather Patterns unit, students
create models to show what they think is happening to cause recent storms in
the fictitious town of Galetown to be so severe, then discuss their models
with a partner in Activity 3. Students then write and publish reports,
explaining to the citizenry of Galetown why they have been suffering from
more severe storms lately, and make predictions about whether or not these strong
storms will continue. |
LAFS.68.WHST.3.7 |
Conduct short research projects to answer a question
(including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and
generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple
avenues of exploration. |
This standard is addressed in multiple units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In the Plate Motion Engineering Internship, Lesson 5, during the activity titled ÒTesting Warning System
DesignsÓ, students use the Futura Tsunami Alert tool to test different
designs for creating a tsunami warning system. In the activity titled,
Analyzing Designs, students first discuss designs with the class and with a
partner, then decide on designs to submit, providing written analysis
regarding why they chose their final design over others. ¥ In Lesson 1.3, Activity 3 of the Ocean, Atmosphere and Currents
unit, students conduct a short investigation using the Ocean, Atmosphere and
Currents simulation to answer the question, ÒHow does air get energy?Ó In
Activity 4 they discuss the evidence they gathered from the simulation, then
write about this topic, using evidence theyÕve gathered from the simulation
and elsewhere. |
LAFS.68.WHST.3.8 |
Gather relevant information from multiple print and
digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and
accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of
others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for
citation. |
This standard is addressed across the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In every unit, students can use the search function
in the Amplify Library to search and find relevant content within articles. ¥ The Weather Patterns unit prioritizes the
consideration of source as an important criterion students should learn about
and use. Beginning in Lesson 3.2, Activity 2, students are asked to read and analyze
a set of possible evidence and sort it according to how reliable each source
of evidence is. Each piece of evidence comes from a different source, and
students evaluate the sources and make conclusions about the inherent biases
of each before deciding which data they should rely upon during the next
activity. In Activity 5, students re-read a section of the article ÒDisaster
in California!Ó that they read in a previous lesson, and reflect in writing
on which sources from the article seem more reliable than others, based on
their burgeoning understanding of more and less reliable sources. Finally, in
Lesson 4.1, Activity 2, students again decide which sources
are more and less reliable from a new set of evidence cards; they discard
sources deemed unreliable then use the remaining evidence to write strong
arguments in Lesson 4.3, Activity 3. |
LAFS.68.WHST.3.9 |
Draw evidence from informational texts to support
analysis reflection, and research. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.3, Activity 2 of the Plate Motion unit, students
re-read the article ÒA Continental Puzzle.Ó then address several questions
about the reading, drawing evidence from the text in their response. ¥ In Lesson 1.1, Activity 4 (press NEXT to see part 2 of 2 of this
activity) of the Geology on Mars unit, students examine cards that provide
information about the different parts of each system (atmosphere,
hydrosphere, biosphere, geosphere) that makes up the rocky planets in our
solar system (Mars, Earth, Venus, Mercury). Students draw information and
evidence from these cards and record this information in writing, then share
what they learn with their peers. ¥ In all Science Seminar Sequences, which occur in
most units in the Life Science Course, students spend either 1-2 days
reading, analyzing and participating in research using evidence cards and
other sources. Then, at the end of the sequence, students use evidence
derived from these sources to support writing final arguments for the unit. |
LAFS.68.WHST.4.10 |
Write routinely over extended time frames (time for
reflection and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day
or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences. |
This standard is addressed in all units of the Earth/Space
Science course. Students write in virtually every lesson, for a wide variety
of purposes. Some examples are: ¥ In Lesson 4.3, Activity 4 of the Plate Motion unit, students
write final arguments to culminate their Science Seminar experience. These
arguments contain content from the entire unit and serve as a culminating
experience for the unit. ¥ In Lesson 3.4, Activity 2 of the Rock Transformations unit, students participate
in a writing and discourse routine called Write and Share. In the routine,
students are broken into small groups, and each group member receives a
different but related prompt. Students write independently for a few minutes
then share their written responses and discuss. ¥ In Lesson 2.2, Activity 3 of the Geology on Mars unit, students
record observations of a hands-on model of stream tables. |
MAFS.6.EE.3.9 |
Use variables to represent two quantities in a
real-world problem that change in relationship to one another; write an
equation to express one quantity, thought of as the dependent variable, in
terms of the other quantity, thought of as the independent variable. Analyze
the relationship between the dependent and independent variables using graphs
and tables, and relate these to the equation. For example, in a problem
involving motion at constant speed, list and graph ordered pairs of distances
and times, and write the equation d = 65t to represent the relationship
between distance and time. |
This standard is addressed throughout the Weather
Patterns unit. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.3, Activity 3 (see the Teacher Support tab), students
use the unitÕs Data Tool to graph weather data. This activity enables
students to model mathematically the relationship between different
variables, such as temperature change, energy released, amount of cloud
formed, and amount of rain formed, and to see how one variable can affect
another. Students then have the opportunity to determine the equation that
relates temperature difference to one of the other variables: students draw a
line of best fit for the data and use it to determine the slope and equation.
¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2 (see the Teacher Support tab) of that
same unit, students again use the Data Tool to analyze how starting air
parcel temperature affects how high the parcel rises. Students graph the data
they collect in the Weather Patterns simulation, determine a line of best
fit, and write an equation relating the two variables. |
MAFS.6.SP.2.4 |
Display numerical data in plots on a number line,
including dot plots, histograms, and box plots. |
This standard is addressed in the Ocean, Atmosphere,
and Climate unit. In Lesson 1.4, Activity 2 ( see the note titled ÒInstructional
Suggestion: Going Further: Mathematical ThinkingÓ in the Teacher Support
tab), students complete a sim extension activity where they gather numerical
data about temperature and latitude and display it in dot plots on a number
line. Students use their dot plots to draw conclusions about temperatures at
different latitudes. |
MAFS.6.SP.2.5 |
Summarize numerical data sets in relation to their
context, such as by: Reporting the number of observations. Describing the
nature of the attribute under investigation, including how it was measured
and its units of measurement. Giving quantitative measures of center (median
and/or mean) and variability (interquartile range and/or mean absolute
deviation), as well as describing any overall pattern and any striking
deviations from the overall pattern with reference to the context in which
the data were gathered. Relating the choice of measures of center and
variability to the shape of the data distribution and the context in which
the data were gathered. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.2, Activity 3 of Weather Patterns, students analyze
data sets representing weather conditions (e.g., temperature, wind speed,
rainfall) of storms around the world to identify patterns across all storms
to conclude that wind led to an increased amount of rain in each storm. ¥ In Lesson 1.5, Activity 3 of Ocean, Atmosphere, and Climate,
students analyze a series of bar graphs, identifying the features of the
graph they are using to get information (title, axis labels, and data), the
variables that the graph shows (air temperature, year), and the units of
measurement (degrees, years). Students use the graphs to draw conclusions
about a specific location (e.g., the air temperature is cooler in New Zealand
during El Ni–o years). |
ELD.K12.ELL.SC.1 |
English language learners communicate information,
ideas and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of
Science. |
In every Amplify Science unit, students are
supported in developing science vocabulary and scientific language structures
in oral discourse and in writing. For example: ¥ In the Weather Patterns unit, Lesson 1.6, Activity 2, students use a Word Relationships
routine to consider how key vocabulary words relate to one another and to
practice forming sentences with these key words. ¥ In the Earth, Moon, and Sun unit, Lesson 4.2, Activity 2, studentsÕ use Argumentation Sentence
Starters to support their use of scientific language as they discuss claims
and evidence about whether lunar eclipses are likely in a binary star system. ¥ In the Plate Motion unit, Lesson 4.3, Activities 2 and 3, students use a Reasoning Tool
graphic organizer as they learn to connect evidence to claims in a written
scientific argument. |
ELD.K12.ELL.SI.1 |
English language learners communicate for social and
instructional purposes within the school setting. |
Student-to-student talk and writing-to-learn are
important aspects of the pedagogical approach throughout Amplify Science, and
Amplify Science uses a set of research-based principles for supporting
English language learners in their oral and written participation: ¥ Access and build on studentsÕ background
knowledge. ¥ Capitalize on studentsÕ knowledge of language. ¥ Provide additional scaffolds for language. ¥ Provide explicit instruction about the language of
science. ¥ Offer multiple entry points into science content. ¥ Provide multiple means of expressing science content
knowledge. These principles are built into each unit. For
example: ¥ In all units, students have opportunity to express
background knowledge orally or in writing (see for example, Weather Patterns,
Lesson 1.2, Activity 1), ¥ In all core units, students use modeling tools to
create visual representations of their explanations, providing English
learners with an opportunity to express their understanding visually in
addition to in writing (see for example, Earth, Moon, and Sun, Lesson 2.4, Activity 4) ¥ Students are provided with scaffolds for oral and
written language use, such as sentence starters (see for example, Geology on
Mars, Lesson 4.6, Activity 3): ¥ Teachers are provided with suggestions for how to
group students in order to support English learners (see for example, Ocean,
Atmosphere, and climate, Lesson 1.5, in the Differentiation Brief, section titled,
ÒSpecific Differentiation Strategies for English LearnersÓ, note titled
ÒStrategic GroupingsÓ. ¥ Teachers are encouraged to capitalize on English
learnersÕ language knowledge, for example by point out Spanish-English
cognates (see for example, Rock Transformations, Lesson 2.1, in the Differentiation Brief, section titled,
ÒSpecific Differentiation Strategies for English LearnersÓ, note titled
ÒAccessing cognates for Spanish-speaking students.Ó |
HE.6.C.1.3 |
Identify environmental factors that affect personal
health. |
This standard is addressed in the Plate Motion
Engineering Internship unit. In that unit, students identify how tsunamis and
earthquakes affect personal health and consider how to protect people from
these natural hazards, using historical data about the frequency of different
magnitudes of earthquakes along the plate boundaries in the Indian Ocean
region. For example, in Lesson 1, Activity 2, students read Chapter 2: ÒTsunamis:
Rare but DangerousÓ of the Futura Geohazards EngineerÕs Dossier, which allows
students to identify a tsunamiÕs potentially deadly effect on humans and how
it is formed. |
MAFS.K12.MP.1.1 |
Make sense of problems and persevere in solving
them. |
Making sense of problems and persevering in solving
them is a common characteristic of Amplify Science units. Each unit begins
with a real-world problem that students address over the course of the unit,
distilling patterns from data, synthesizing across a variety of evidence
sources (e.g., text, tables, and graphs), and creating models to illustrate
relationships between ideas. For example: ¥ In Weather Patterns (see Lesson 1.2, the activity titled ÒIntroducing the Mystery of
Galetown StormsÓ), students assume the role of student forensic
meteorologists as they investigate how water vapor, temperature, energy
transfer, and wind influence local weather patterns in a fictional town.
Using weather data, physical models, a digital simulation, and hands-on
activities, and science texts, students investigate the mechanisms by which a
warm weather rainstorm can be generated, through the lens of energy transfer. ¥ In Plate Motion Engineering Internship (see Lesson 1, the activity titled ÒIntroducing FuturaÓ),
students assume the role of geohazards engineering interns at Futura Engineering
to design a tsunami warning system. They will use a digital model to simulate
placing earthquake, deep water, and shallow water sensors at various places
in the Indian Ocean region in order to maximize the response time people
receive to get to safety, while operating within other design constraints. As
they persevere in solving this problem, they strategically break it down into
smaller parts, look for correspondences between and across quantitative data,
and frequently use visual representations and models to investigate
scientific ideas and test their designs. ¥ In Geology on Mars (see Lesson 1.1, the activity titled ÒIntroducing the Student
Planetary Scientist RoleÓ), students take on the role of student planetary
geologists working to investigate the planet Mars, students search for
evidence of past liquid water on the surface to determine habitability of
Mars. Students explain this problem by answering smaller questions one at a
time. Students compare a channel on Mars to analogous structures on EarthÕs
surface and use physical models to gather evidence and evaluate whether it
supports the claim that flowing liquid water formed the channel. |
MAFS.K12.MP.2.1 |
Reason abstractly and quantitatively. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.6, Activity 1 of Weather Patterns, students analyze
weather data (amount of rainfall, level of local surface water) from
different storms. They decontextualize by observing patterns in the
quantitative data about the different storms; they then contextualize the
data by using it to support a claim about the cause of severe storms. ¥ In Lesson 3.1, Activity 2 of Plate Motion (press NEXT to see part
3 of 3), students gather data in the Plate Motion Sim (span of time and
distance of plate travel). Students decontextualize the data by using it to
calculate the rate of plate movement over a certain time period. Students
then contextualize their results by considering what they mean in terms of
plate motion, allowing students to conclude that EarthÕs plates travel at a
rate too slow to be experienced by humans. |
MAFS.K12.MP.3.1 |
Construct viable arguments and critique the
reasoning of others. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.5, Activity 5 of Weather Patterns, students
investigate the effect of more water vapor in the air on the amount of
rainfall to help them evaluate a claim that a lake in the fictional town of
Galetown caused more rain in that town. ¥ In Geology on Mars (see Lesson 3.3, Activity 2 for example), students evaluate
evidence and generate arguments about whether flowing water caused a channel
to form on Mars. In doing so, students reason inductively about data and make
plausible arguments by taking into account the context from which the data
arose. |
MAFS.K12.MP.4.1 |
Model with mathematics. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.1, Activity 2 of Weather Patterns (see the Teacher
Support tab), students use the Data Tool to mathematically model how the
starting temperature of an air parcel affects how high the parcel rises.
Students use temperature and height data from the sim to create a scatter
plot and draw a best fit line for the data. Using the line, students are
prompted to determine the slope and an equation for their line. ¥ In Lesson 3.1, Activity 2 of Plate Motion, students gather
evidence in the Plate Motion Sim (a digital model) and use their data to
calculate the rate of plate movement over millions of years (press NEXT to
see Part 3 of 3). Through modeling plate motion and gathering data in the
Sim, students conclude that EarthÕs plates travel at a rate too slow to be
experienced by humans. |
MAFS.K12.MP.5.1 |
Use appropriate tools strategically. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3.1, the activity titled ÒVideo: Plate Motion and GPS,Ó
of Plate Motion, students learn that GPS can be used to measure the rate and
direction of plate movement. Then, in Activity 2, students gather evidence in
the Plate Motion Sim (a digital model) and use their data to calculate the
rate of plate movement over millions of years. Through modeling plate motion
and gathering data in the Sim, students conclude that EarthÕs plates travel
at a rate too slow to be experienced by humans. ¥ In Lesson 1.2, Activity 2 of Geology on Mars, students use an
interactive digital tool, Google Mars, to explore the surface of Mars and
identify landforms using elevation data that could be evidence that water
once flowed on the planet. |
MAFS.K12.MP.6.1 |
Attend to precision. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 3, the activity titled ÒInvestigating Earthquakes
with TsunamiAlertÓ of Plate Motion Engineering Internship, students use an
ocean landform map and the TsunamiAlert Design Tool (a digital model) to
identify the different types of plate boundaries found in the Indian Ocean.
Students attend to precision as they annotate a map with likely earthquake
and tsunami locations, which will ultimately inform their designs of tsunami
warning systems. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 2 of Earth, Moon, and Sun, students make
models of the moon at different times of month, attending to precision as
they consider how much of the moon is visible from different locations. |
MAFS.K12.MP.7.1 |
Look for and make use of structure. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 1.4, Activity 2 of Ocean, Atmosphere, and Currents,
students examine maps to identify patterns of energy transfer on Earth,
concluding that there is more energy transferred to the parts of Earth that
are closer to the equator and less energy transferred to parts further away
from the equator. ¥ In Lesson 1.3, Activity 3 (see the Teacher Support tab in Part 1
of 3, the note titled ÒGoing Further: Mathematical ThinkingÓ) of Weather
Patterns, students use the unitÕs Data Tool to graph data points for weather
data. Students then draw a line of best fit for the data and use it to
describe the pattern in the data. ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 3 of Earth, Moon, and Sun (see the
Teacher Support tab, the note titled ÒGoing Further: Mathematical ThinkingÓ),
students use the equation for surface area (SA = 4¹r2) to
determine the surface area of the moon. Students use the structure of this
equation to determine the total surface area of the moon that is illuminated
at different positions on Earth at a particular time. |
MAFS.K12.MP.8.1 |
Look for and express regularity in repeated
reasoning. |
This standard is addressed across multiple units in
the Earth/Space Science course. For example: ¥ In Lesson 2.3, Activity 3 of Weather Patterns, students analyze
and graph weather data to identify patterns and regularity in the
relationship between the starting temperature of an air parcel, amount of
rain, the height the parcel rises, and the amount of energy transferred out.
Students discover relationships such as: as the starting air parcel
temperature increases, the amount of rain also increases. ¥ In Chapter 1 of Ocean, Atmosphere, and Currents,
students gather data from multiple evidence sources, including collecting
temperature data from the unitÕs digital sim, to identify the repeated
pattern that as solar energy decreases, air temperature increases (see Lesson 1.3, Activity 3 as an example). |