Bush Has Widened Authority of C.I.A. to Kill Terrorists
by James Risen and David Johnston
The New York Times
December 15, 2002
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/international/15INTE.html
WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 The Bush administration has prepared a list of
terrorist leaders the Central Intelligence Agency is authorized to kill, if
capture is impractical and civilian casualties can be minimized, senior military
and intelligence officials said.
The previously undisclosed C.I.A. list includes key Qaeda leaders like Osama
bin Laden and his chief deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, as well as other principal
figures from Al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist groups, the officials said. The
names of about two dozen terrorist leaders have recently been on the lethal-force
list, officials said. "It's the worst of the worst," an official said.
President Bush has provided written legal authority to the C.I.A. to hunt down
and kill the terrorists without seeking further approval each time the agency
is about to stage an operation. Some officials said the terrorist list was known
as the "high-value target list." A spokesman for the White House declined
to discuss the list or issues involving the use of lethal force against terrorists.
A spokesman for the C.I.A. also declined to comment on the list.
Despite the authority given to the agency, Mr. Bush has not waived the executive
order banning assassinations, officials said. The presidential authority to
kill terrorists defines operatives of Al Qaeda as enemy combatants and thus
legitimate targets for lethal force.
Mr. Bush issued a presidential finding last year, after the Sept. 11 attacks
on New York and Washington, providing the basic executive and legal authority
for the C.I.A. to either kill or capture terrorist leaders. Initially, the agency
used that authority to hunt for Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan. That authority
was the basis for the C.I.A.'s attempts to find and kill or capture Mr. Bin
laden and other Qaeda leaders during the war in Afghanistan.
The creation of the secret list is part of the expanded C.I.A. effort to hunt
and kill or capture Qaeda operatives far from traditional battlefields, in countries
like Yemen.
The president is not legally required to approve each name added to the list,
nor is the C.I.A. required to obtain presidential approval for specific attacks,
although officials said Mr. Bush had been kept well informed about the agency's
operations.
In November, the C.I.A. killed a Qaeda leader in a remote region of Yemen.
A pilotless Predator aircraft operated by the agency fired a Hellfire antitank
missile at a car in which Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi, also known as Abu Ali,
was riding. Mr. Harethi and five other people, including one suspected Qaeda
operative with United States citizenship, were killed in the attack.
Mr. Harethi, a key Al Qaeda leader in Yemen who is suspected of helping to
plan the bombing of the American destroyer Cole in 2000, is believed to have
been on the list of Qaeda leaders that the C.I.A. had been authorized to kill.
After the Predator operation in Yemen, American officials said Mr. Bush was
not required to approve the mission before the attack, nor was he specifically
consulted.
Intelligence officials said the presidential finding authorizing the agency
to kill terrorists was not limited to those on the list. The president has given
broad authority to the C.I.A. to kill or capture operatives of Al Qaeda around
the world, the officials said. But officials said the group's most senior leaders
on the list were the agency's primary focus.
The list is updated periodically as the intelligence agency, in consultation
with other counterterrorism agencies, adds new names or deletes those who are
captured or killed, or when intelligence indicates the emergence of a new leader.
The precise criteria for adding someone to the list are unclear, although the
evidence against each person must be clear and convincing, the officials said.
The list contains the names of some of the same people who are on the Federal
Bureau of Investigation's list of most wanted terror suspects, although the
lists are prepared independently.
Officials said the C.I.A., working with the F.B.I., the military and foreign
governments, will seek to capture terrorists when possible and bring them into
custody.
Counterterrorism officials prefer to capture senior Qaeda leaders for interrogation,
if possible. They regard killing as a last resort in cases in which the location
of a Qaeda operative is known but capture would be too dangerous or logistically
impossible, the officials said.
Under current intelligence law, the president must sign a finding to provide
the legal basis for covert actions to be carried out by the C.I.A. In response
to past abuses, the decision-making process has grown into a highly formalized
review in which the White House, Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon
and C.I.A. take part.
The administration must notify Congressional leaders of any covert action finding
signed by the president. In the case of the presidential finding authorizing
the use of lethal force against members of Al Qaeda, Congressional leaders have
been notified as required, the officials said.
The new emphasis on covert action is an outgrowth of more aggressive attitudes
regarding the use of lethal force in the campaign against terrorism. Moreover,
such operations have become easier to conduct because of technological advances
like the development of the Predator, which has evolved from a camera-carrying
surveillance drone into an armed robot warplane controlled by operators safely
stationed thousands of miles from any attack.
The development of the armed Predator drone has made it much easier for the
C.I.A. to pursue and kill terrorists in ways that would almost certainly not
have been tried in the past for fear of the potential for American casualties.
In the strike in Yemen, for example, Mr. Harethi was living in a remote, lawless
region where the Yemeni government had little control. Not long before the Predator
strike, Yemeni forces attacked Qaeda operatives in that same area and were beaten
back with many casualties.
The more aggressive approach to counterterrorism is showing results. George
J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, said in a speech last week that
more than one-third of the top leadership of Al Qaeda identified before the
war in Afghanistan had been killed or captured.
One recent success, he said, came with the capture of Al Qaeda's operations
chief for the Persian Gulf region who had been involved in the planning of the
1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa as well as the bombing
of the Cole in 2000. Since September 2001, Mr. Tenet added, more than 3,000
suspected Qaeda operatives or their associates have been detained in more than
100 countries.
But the decision by the Bush administration to authorize, under certain circumstances,
the killing of terrorist leaders threatens to thrust it into a murky area of
national security and international law that is almost never debated in public
because the covert operations are known only to a small circle of executive
branch and Congressional officials.
In the past, the Bush administration has criticized the targeting of Palestinian
leaders by Israeli forces. But one former senior official said such criticism
had diminished as the administration sought to move aggressively against Al
Qaeda.
Still, some national security lawyers said the practice of drawing up lists
of people who are subject to lethal force might blur the lines drawn by government's
ban on assassinations. That prohibition was first ordered by President Gerald
Ford, and in the view of some lawyers, it applies not only to foreign leaders
but to civilians. (American officials have said in the past that Saddam Hussein
would be a legitimate target in a war, as he is a military commander as well
as Iraq's president.)
"The inevitable complication of a politically declared but legally undeclared war is the blurring of the distinction between enemy combatants and other nonstate actors," said Harold Hongju Koh, a professor of international law at Yale University and a former State Department official in President Bill Clinton's administration. "The question is, what factual showing will demonstrate that they had warlike intentions against us and who sees that evidence before any action is taken?"
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.